• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

German Balsamico vinegar? No infringement for the General Advocate

29. July 2019

Does a product such as German Balsamico infringe the term “Aceto Balsamico di Modena”, protected as a designation of origin and geographical indication? The General Advocate is in favour of the German Balsamico.

Deutscher Balsamico

German Balsamico – association with Italian Balsamico di Modena?

In his Opinion, the Advocate General has spoken in favour of German balsamic vinegar. This is the recent stage, for the time being, of years of dispute between the Italian producer group (Consorzio) of products protected as “Aceto Balsamico di Modena” – protected as a designation of origin (g.U.) and geographical indication (g.t.A.) –  and Balema GmbH (Germany), which markets products such as German Balsamico.

The products of Balema GmbH are clearly labelled as German products, with the inscription “Theo der vineagar producer, maturation in the wooden barrel, German Balsamico traditional, naturally cloudy from Baden wines”. The Italian Consorzio warned the German manufacturer and Balema GmbH filed a negative declaratory action.

The Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court granted the claim in 2017. The Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena appealed against this judgment before the BGH (I ZR 253/16), which considers its judgment to be imperatively connected with the interpretation of Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 583/2009 and has accordingly made a reference to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling.

Protection of the overall designation – also guarantee protection of the non-geographical terms therein?

The Supreme European Court (ECJ) is therefore asked whether the protection conferred by Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 583/2009 on the collective name “Aceto Balsamico di Modena” extends to the use of the individual non-geographical terms of the compound name (“Aceto”, “Balsamico”, “Aceto Balsamico”).

In his yesterday’s Opinion, the Advocate General has pointed out that the term ‘generic name’ is used with two and essentially different meanings: first, for product names which have become a general name for a product in the Union, even though they refer to the place, region or country in which the product was originally manufactured or marketed (pursuant to Article 2(1) of the EC Treaty). 3(6) of Regulation No 1151/2012), on the other hand, as a term for general or common words which, precisely because of their generic quality, do not satisfy the conditions for registration as a PGI or PDO. (Read more about the geographical EU designations of origin in our article: EU geographical designation: Dresden Christstollen also protected internationally?)

The Advocate General also stated that a compound name entered in the PGI and PDO register may contain generic or otherwise unprotected elements and that the use of that generic element is not an infringement of the protected designation.

“Aceto”, “balsamico” and “Aceto Balsamico”: general words

In the present case, the Advocate General considers that the terms ‘aceto’, ‘balsamico’ and ‘aceto balsamico’ are general words. Only the obvious geographical reference of the word ‘Modena’ evokes an association with ‘Aceto balsamico tradizionale di Modena’, even if it designates other vinegars or spices.

The Advocate General therefore proposes that the general and non-geographical terms like aceto, balsamico and aceto balsamico may be used without infringing the right of “aceto balsamico di Modena” to protection.

Should the European Court of Justice (ECJ) endorse the arguments of the Advocate General, the defendant Balema GmbH could continue to market German Balsamico.

The case also arouses the international interest. The Governments of Germany, Greece and France all took the view that the terms “aceto”, “aceto balsamico” and “balsamico” were generic or non-geographical and that only the generic term “aceto balsamico di Modena” should be protected instead of their individual non-geographical terms. This view was confirmed by yesterday’s Opinion of the Advocate General.

Protected geographical indication – other recent judgments:

  • Geographical word mark Swabian Glen Whisky: Glen sounds too Scottish
  • Grand Canyon rejected as word mark in Japan
  • ECJ: Packaging dispute about Black Forest ham decided

 

Would you also like to protect your brand or a foodstuff?

Our attorneys have many years of experience in trademark law and intellectual property law and are authorized to represent you before any court in Germany as well as internationally.
Please feel free to contact us if you are interested.


 

 

 

Sources:

Opinion of General Advocate “Deutscher Balsamico” EU:C:2019:650

Image:

eak_kkk /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  14 
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconProduct- and Trademark piracy,  Trademark Law Tag iconGeographical indications,  General Advocate,  opinion of general advocate,  Deutscher Balsamico,  Modena,  geografic origin,  designation of origin,  German Balsamico,  vinegar

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Product- and Trademark piracy

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Bacardi wins in trademark dispute Vodka 42 BELOW 20. January 2021
  • HALLOUMI vs. BBQLOUMI: Cyprus loses again in trademark dispute 20. January 2021
  • Short word marks and similarity: First letter is not everything 19. January 2021
  • Where in Europe is a patent application worthwhile? 18. January 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

20. January 2021
Bacardi wins in trademark dispute Vodka 42 BELOW

Bacardi wins in trademark dispute Vodka 42 BELOW

20. January 2021
HALLOUMI vs. BBQLOUMI: Cyprus loses again in trademark dispute

HALLOUMI vs. BBQLOUMI: Cyprus loses again in trademark dispute

19. January 2021
Short word marks and similarity: First letter is not everything

Short word marks and similarity: First letter is not everything

15. January 2021
HOTTINGER vs. HOTTINGUER: trademark dispute over financial services

HOTTINGER vs. HOTTINGUER: trademark dispute over financial services

12. January 2021
US Trademark Law Modernized (TMA): Faster and Better for Trademark Challenges

US Trademark Law Modernized (TMA): Faster and Better for Trademark Challenges

7. January 2021
Nice Classification 2021: Robots, Joysticks and Automation

Nice Classification 2021: Robots, Joysticks and Automation

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form