• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Glen sounds too Scottish

8. February 2019

The Swabian whisky Glen Buchenbach may no longer – at least for the time being – be called so. Yesterday, the German Regional Court ruled in the dispute about the name Glen and the geographical name Scotch, which had already been heard before the European Court of Justice.

Glen WhiskyThe Scottish Whisky Association (TSWA) had sued Glen Whisky Scotch against the German Swabian whisky producer Michael Klotz, who produces and sells a whisky called “Glen Buchenbach“. The applicant in the main proceedings argued that the use of the term “Glen” infringes the registered geographical indication “Scotch Whisky” ( we reported: Geographical word mark: Swabian Glen Whisky- is anyone thinking of Scotland?). This area of law is regulated by a separate EU regulation, Regulation (EC) No. 110/2008.

Is the name Glen justified in the Swabian Buchenbachtal?

The German whisky producer had argued that it was clearly indicating in the name of the whisky that it was a German whisky, namely a Swabian whisky. For example, the label of the disputed whisky contains the following information: Waldhornbrennerei, Glen Buchenbach, Swabian Single Malt Whisky.

The applicant TSWA, on the other hand, took the view that the name ‘Glen’ evoked in consumers an association with Scotland and Scottish whisky, notwithstanding the other indications added concerning the German origin of the product.

The case was heard even before the European Court of Justice (ECJ), which ruled by judgment of 7 June 2018 (C 44/17) that “indirect commercial use” of a registered geographical indication exists only if the contested ingredient is used in a form identical to, or phonetically and/or visually similar to, that indication.

It is therefore not sufficient, the ECJ held, that any association with the registered geographical indication or the associated geographical area may arouse consumer interest. Moreover, the proximity of the designation to the indication in terms of content must also be taken into account.

However, an “allusion” within the meaning of the EU Directive may exist even if the true origin of the product is indicated (judgment of 21 January 2016, Viiniverla, C-75/15, EU:C:2016:35), the ECJ ruled. It is therefore decisive and was to be examined by the Landgericht Hamburg whether average consumers immediately think of “Scotch Whisky” when they hear the term “Glen”.

Glen sounds too Scottish

The Regional Court in Hamburg (Landgericht Hamburg) made its decision yesterday. A Swabian whisky must not have the word “Glen” in its name, the LG Hamburg ruled. With the name component “Glen” the particularly protected geographical indication Scotch is impaired.

The EU spirit regulation not only protects the direct use of the geographical indication of origin, but also adjacent misleading designations. The LG Hamburg found that the additional information on the German origin of the whisky on the labels was not sufficient. Most whiskies in Germany have a Scottish origin, as the name suggests. Also the label may play no role with the question about the misleading, since the protection of the European Union regulation is to be otherwise too simply levered out, judged also the EuGH. And misleading designations are to be based on the individual word, not on the overall impression of the product, the LG Hamburg clarified.

The whisky Glen Buchenbach, distilled near Stuttgart in Swabia, may no longer – at least for the time being – be called so. The German Whisky manufacturer Michael Klotz can appeal against the judgement of the LG Hamburg, for this decision is one month long time.

The Scottish Whisky Association showed up yesterday immediately very pleased about the judgement. One presented clear proofs that “Glen” is closely connected with Scotland and Scotch Whisky, according to the Scotch Whisky Associaton.

Would you also like to protect your brand or trademark?

Then please do not hesitate to contact us. Our patent attorneys and attorneys at law are experienced and highly qualified in all areas of intellectual property law, both nationally and internationally.

Request your call-back without any obligations!

CAT-call_en

Source:

ECJ Judgment Glen Buchenbach June 2018 C‑44/17

Landgericht Hamburg

Picture:

stevepb /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Product- and Trademark piracy,  Trademark Law Tag iconGermany,  LG Hamburg,  Glen Buchenbach,  Glen,  Glen Whisky,  Scotch

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

14. February 2022
Crypto trading: NFT for luxury and art

Crypto trading: NFT for luxury and art

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]