• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Unified Patent Court: UPC is coming!

26. November 2020

A current report of the press agency dpa awakens the hope for the European Patent Court. European Commission has announced that the Unified Patent Court (UPC) is due to start in a few months, and it is up to Germany to clear the way. And Germany declared that this should happen 2020. Is the UPC really coming?

Europäisches EinheitsgerichtAccording to a press agency dpa, the European Commission has announced that the Unified Patent Court is due to start in a few months, and it is up to Germany to clear the way. And the German Federal Ministry of Justice has also declared that this should happen this year.

UPC has to be ratificated

Most European countries have long since completed the necessary ratification of the Unified Patent Court (UPC). After some back and forth, this was also ratified in the UK in April 2018, we reported. But not Germany, where a constitutional complaint has so far slowed down the ratification process. According to dpa reports, the German Federal Ministry of Justice now announces that ratification will take place in 2020.

With the ratification of the UPC, the national parliaments agree to hand over to the EU the hitherto national sovereignty of interpretation of patent law.
The entire responsibility for patentable intellectual property is transferred to the UPC. This applies to actions (i.e. infringement actions, actions and counterclaims for annulment, injunctions) against a unit patent and also against decisions of the EPO.

Ratification in Germany stopped by constitutional complaint

In March 2020, the Federal Constitutional Court had upheld a complaint against the UPC, thereby stopping the entry into force of the Unified Patent for an indefinite period of time. The core of this lawsuit against the Unified Patent Court was that the Bundestag unanimously adopted the draft bill for the corresponding treaty law, but this did not result in a two-thirds majority in parliament. For only about 35 members of parliament were present.

However, in the case of the Unified Patent and the Unified Patent Court it is ultimately a matter of the transfer of sovereign rights – and this has constitutional relevance, the Federal Constitutional Court explained. If the Federal Ministry of Justice now wants to clear the way again for the UPC “this year”, as it is said in the announcement of the German Press Agency (dpa), a reading of the bill on the Unified Patent Court must take place before a two-thirds full parliament this actually happened on November 26, 2020, the Federal Ministry of Justice informed in the meantime. Now the bill still has to pass the Bundesrat.

Time is also pressing through the brexit

But it is not only time that is pressing, but now visibly the political level is also pressing. This, in turn, is also related to the brexit, which, although still fraught with uncertainty, will still be produced by the deadline of 31 December 2020 – as things stand at present.
After all, the UK is indispensable for a European Single Patent Court. In addition, it was agreed as a precondition for the entry into force of the Unified Patent Court that ratification of the EPC is mandatory by Germany, France and the UK (“True Top 4”: four EU member states in which patents are currently most frequently validated: Germany, France, UK and the Netherlands).

UPC – exclusively for member states of EU

This is because the unified patent court was conceived and contractually established exclusively for the member states of the EU. The aim is to unify patent law and patent legislation in the EU, analogous to the successful development in trademark and design law. The current EU patent is – contrary to its name suggests – neither limited to EU member states nor is it a uniform patent. It must be validated in each individual country and must also stand up to the national patent courts.

With the new EU Unified Patent, all this will change: the EU Unified Patent will only be valid in the EU member states, with one application for the EU.

UPC – what are the advantages?

According to the dpa report, companies should soon be able to protect their inventions more easily and more cheaply thanks to the EU unitary patent, the EU Commission announced. In fact, a EU unitary patent would simplify the application and validation of a patent throughout the EU. Ultimately, the costs of the single patent should also be lower than under the current system.

However, the jurisdiction for patent procedures is just as important for companies. This is because it is currently necessary to bring a possible patent infringement before a court in the country in which the patent was infringed. With the entry into force of the Unified Patent Court, this is to be different; Union law and the interpretative competence of the European Court of Justice would have priority.

No UK in the European Unified Patent Court

However, the UK will not be part of the UPC, was announced by the Office of Prime Minister Boris Johnson in february 2020.

Therefore, no British judges can become officials of the Union, and no chambers of the European Unified Patent Court can be located in London as originally planned.

Do you also want to protect or defend your patent?

Our attorneys have many years of expertise in patent law as well as in the entire field of intellectual property and are authorized to represent you before any court – in Germany and internationally.
Please contact us if you are interested.


Sources: 

dpa Press agency announcement

Bild:

MabelAmber | pixabay.com | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag iconBrexit,  Constitutional Action,  EU Patent Court,  EU Patents,  EU Unified Court,  EU Unified Patent,  EU-Patent,  European Unified Patent Court,  ratification,  Ratification of the Unified Patent Court,  UK,  UK in UPC,  Unified Court,  unified european patent court,  Unified Patent Court,  Unitary Patent Court,  UPC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.