• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Eva Maria Amoah
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Brexit (2): European patents safe? Yes and No!

16. October 2018

The Brexit has no impact on European patents validated in the UK. This position is currently held by both the European Patent Office and the British government. The main reason for this is that the European Patent Organisation is an independent international organisation, not an EU institution. But Brexit means problems for patents, too.

Good news for patent protection in the UK

Brexit PatentsThe Brexit has no impact on the UK’s membership in the European Patent Organisation (EPO), nor on European patents validated in the UK after the Brexit, according to a press release issued by the European Patent Office (EPO) in January 2018 – we reported. The European Patent Organisation is an independent international organisation.

The European patent, in turn, is granted by the EPO. Contrary to what its name suggests, it is not limited to the EU Member States.

The European Patent Convention (EPC; French Convention sur le brevet européen, CBE) has a total of 38 contracting states. These include all 28 member states of the EU as well as 10 other states. These include EU-related countries such as Norway and Switzerland, but also Iceland, Macedonia and Turkey. In addition, the European Patent Organisation has concluded agreements on the extension of the protection of European patents with some states that are not members of the EPC. These are currently Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro. Through the EPC, its contracting states form a special association under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (IPPC) and follow the rules agreed there.

If a European patent is applied for at the EPO, all countries from the 38 contracting states in which the European patent is to be validated nationally can be listed. The European patent acts like a bundle of national patents. The patent applicant must request the validation of his European patent at the respective national patent offices. The EPO handles the necessary grant procedure and also the processing of any opposition proceedings. Moreover, the European patent functions like a bundle of national patents of the desired contracting states.

Jurisdiction of European patents

If opposition proceedings take place in the months following the grant procedure of the European patent, EPO-certified patent attorneys and attorneys at law in many countries – including Germany and the UK – are entitled to represent their clients before the EPO. This also applies to European Patent Attorneys based in the UK after the Brexit.

If one considers the jurisdiction of patent proceedings, the situation is not so clearly regulated. Currently, a possible patent infringement is being negotiated before the national courts in the country in which the patent infringement took place and on the basis of the patent law applicable there. This is complicated not only by national differences in law, but also by different national professions and rules for patent attorneys. Moreover, patent applications as well as patents can be transferred through legal transactions – this can also be handled very differently at national level.

Because this situation already leads to contradictory decisions by the national courts, work has been going on for years to standardise the European jurisdiction for patents. The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is intended to make patents and patent jurisdiction more uniform and simpler for all EU Member States. In the interests of legal certainty, it is therefore attractive to participate in the EU jurisdiction that will be created with the Unified Patent Court. However, the territorial validity of the European Unitary patent and Unified Patent Court will only apply to those EU Member States which joined the European Patent Court at the time of the entry into force of the Unitary patent. The UK ratified the UPC in April 2018, but Germany has not yet ratified it (see also UK ratifies the European Patent Court). It is therefore possible that the UPC will not enter into force until the UK has ceased to be an EU member state after the Brexit. It is therefore still open whether the UK will participate in the European Single Court – despite ratification.

Incidentally, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) would not be an instance court for the future Unified Patent Court, but would be responsible for interpreting corresponding EU patent issues. To what extent this will then be taken into account by the non-European member states of the EPC, which will also include the UK after the Brexit, is a question of political will.

Do you need support in patent and licensing law?

Our Patent Attorneys and Attorneys at Law bundle are experts in patent- and trademark law, national and international.
Please take your chance and contact us – a request for a call-back is non-binding:

CAT-call_en

 

Sources:

EPO Press Release January 2018

Picture:

aitoff /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag iconBrexit,  UK,  EPC,  EU Patent Application,  EU patent protection,  European Patents,  patent protection,  Unified Patent Court,  International jurisdiction

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Chianti vs GHISU: advantage taken unfairly of the earlier mark 15. April 2021
  • ECJ on legitimate interest: Appeal against amendment of specifications 15. April 2021
  • Case law product similarity: consumer attention 13. April 2021
  • OLG Düsseldorf: No compensation for damages of gratuitous licensing 9. April 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

8. April 2021
Hitachi patent partially invalid in GER: code distribution for mobile communication

Hitachi patent partially invalid in GER: code distribution for mobile communication

29. March 2021
EuGH / Case Lundbeck:  Restriction by object

EuGH / Case Lundbeck: Restriction by object

23. March 2021
Employee’s invention with software

Employee’s invention with software

22. March 2021
EPO Statistics: Western world less innovative

EPO Statistics: Western world less innovative

19. March 2021
Enlarged Board of Appeal: Mixed inventions with computer

Enlarged Board of Appeal: Mixed inventions with computer

18. March 2021
Market Abuse SEP Data Package: OLG Karlsruhe

Market Abuse SEP Data Package: OLG Karlsruhe

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form