• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Thermomix infringement by Lidl: Will Monsieur Cuisine still exist?

25. January 2021

Thermomix is the trend – but many people also like to use the very similar and much cheaper model from Lidl, known as Monsieur Cuisine Connect. Lidl has just been convicted in Spain of patent infringement against Vorwerk’s Thermomix patent. Will the Lidl Monsieur Cuisine still be available in other countries?

Thermomix

Thermomix- internationally famous kitchen robot

Vorwerk’s Thermomix hit a new trend at just the right time: more cooking and smoothie blending at home with as much support as possible. Thermomix is represented in more than 60 countries and is considered the market leader in the field of kitchen robots with its Thermomix. No wonder that other companies were also happy to flirt with a similar own product.

A particularly well-known and popular alternative to Lidl’s Thermomix is a kitchen mixer called Monsieur Cuisine Connect, which is strikingly similar to Vorwerk’s Thermomix Original in many respects, but is considerably cheaper.

Now a verdict of unauthorized imitation of the Thermomix has been handed down in Spain. Last week, the Commercial Court in Barcelona ruled in favor of Vorwerk and held that the Lidl’s kitchen mixer constituted an infringement of Vorwerk’s patent rights.

Vorwerk holds EP patent

This is because Vorwerk has been the owner of the European patent “Kitchen Machine” (EP 1269 898) since 2002, which has also been validated for Spain. Vorwerk invoked this patent and claimed patent infringement by the Lidl clone of the Thermomix, especially with regard to the Thermomix® scale and its interaction with the blades as well as the appliance cover. In particular, the function of weighing food in the original Thermomix and also in the Lidl clone of the Thermomix decided the infringement proceedings in favor of Vorwerk.

This is because the function of weighing is carried out in the Thermomix thanks to a special technology that is independent of the circuit that controls the movement of the jar. This feature enables weighing when the machine is running, when the jar is closed and working with the lid, and when the machine is at rest but switched on by pouring food into the jar – and has been replicated 1:1 in the Lidl imitation.

Spanish court ruled in favor of Thermomix

The Barcelona Commercial Court therefore ruled in favor of Thermomix and Vorwerk. Lidl was ordered to remove its Monsieur Cuisine kitchen mixer from the Spanish market and to stop all advertising for this product. Lidl must also pay damages to Vorwerk.

In the course of the patent infringement proceedings, Lidl, for its part, also filed a lawsuit against Vorwerk; Lidl is filing a motion to invalidate the Thermomix patent. This is a common action against long-standing patents. A nullity action was also brought against the predecessor patent of a kitchen mixer to the current Thermomix even before the German Federal Patent Court (2 Ni 20/13 (EP), in 2015)-but to no avail. Lidl’s current application for invalidity was also rejected by the Spanish court. The Spanish court ruled that the Thermomix invention met the requirements of novelty and inventive step.

This has no direct implications for Germany or other states than Spain. This is because patent law is a territorial right, it only applies in the country in which the patent was validated – and its rights must also be defended individually in each country. However, Lidl will still be weighing up whether further sales of the Thermomix clone are still worthwhile after the Spanish ruling. And Vorwerk will tactically decide whether and in which countries to file a lawsuit against Lidl for patent infringement.

Because the Spanish judgement has increased the likelihood that other courts will issue similar rulings. Although Lidl can still appeal in Spain, the Spanish proceedings mean that the two kitchen mixers, Thermomix and Monsieur Cuisine, have already been compared in detail by technical experts. If their findings cannot be shaken, Lidl ultimately risks high compensation costs if it continues to sell its Thermomix clone – including sales outside Spain.

For the time being, Lidl will continue to offer the Monsieur Cuisine in its online store – and via Amazon.

Would you also like to protect your patent, trademark or design?

Our attorneys will be happy to advise you. If you are interested, please contact us – we look forward to your call!

 

Sources:

RTVE Spain: News Thermomix

Image:

ponce_photography | pixabay.com | CCO License

 

  • share  18 
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law,  Copyright,  Product- and Trademark piracy Tag iconMonsieur Cuisine,  imitation,  Lidl,  Spain,  plagiarism,  Lidl clone,  kitchen mixer,  kitchen robot,  judgment,  Thermomix

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

14. February 2022
Crypto trading: NFT for luxury and art

Crypto trading: NFT for luxury and art

11. February 2022
Shipwreck for Iglo: lawsuit over figure Käpt’n Iglo

Shipwreck for Iglo: lawsuit over figure Käpt’n Iglo

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Torhaus Westhafen
Speicherstrasse 59
D – 60327 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]