• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Bottle shape protected as 3D unionmark

5. October 2018

An amphora-like receptacle with a bead in the bottle shape may be protected as a three-dimensional Unionmark. On Wednesday, the Court of the European Union ruled, overturning the decision of the EUIPO. This is an important decision for 3D brands in the packaging sector.

The background to this decision is years of opposition proceedings between the plaintiff, the German Wajos GmbH, and the European Patent and Trademark Office (EUIPO) concerning trademark protection for an amphora-like vessel. In summer 2016, the EUIPO examiner refused the desired trademark registration and the Board of Appeal confirmed this refusal in February 2017 (R 1526/2016-1).

Trademark registration justified by visible bead in the bottle shape?

bottle shapeThis decision has now been annulled by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). An amphora-like vessel with a bead in the shape of a bottle can be protected as a three-dimensional Unionmark. The disputed mark can be registered for the nizza classes 29, 30, 32 and 33 applied for – all classes containing liquid goods such as oils, coffee, tea, cocoa, non-alcoholic beverages, non-alcoholic cocktails and fruit drinks as well as alcoholic beverages such as beer and brewing products, wines and spirits. The decisive question was distinctiveness in relation to those goods. Since liquids require a bottle shape as an elementarily necessary packaging, a trade mark registration could only be justified by the visible bead in the shape of a vessel.

The Board of Appeal had found that that bead was technical and functional and had therefore excluded it as a characteristic identifying the product’s origin. The mark applied for is therefore devoid of any distinctive character within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

The Court of the European Union (CJEU) is an independent European court with its seat in Luxembourg, which is subordinate to the European Court of Justice (CJEU).

Distinctive character of the Unionmark

According to case-law in the EU, the distinctive character of a trade mark must be assessed, first, by reference to the goods or services in respect of which registration has been applied for and, second, by reference to the perception which the relevant public has of it. Accordingly, the applicant argued that its goods appealed to consumers in the exclusive, high-priced delicatessen sector, and that that group of consumers was well informed, attentive and circumspect. The CJEU contradicted this. According to the case-law, the relevant public in the field of everyday consumer goods in the food industry is essentially the average consumer, and that is also the case here.

In addition, the applicant argued that its bead-like ring or its aesthetic break edge was a special and memorable feature in terms of its design. That element is not purely functional, since it is not necessary for the storage of the mark applied for. However, according to EUIPO, the range of shapes of packaging in the relevant market segment is rich and the mark applied for does not differ significantly from the usual shapes.

Bottle shape must assert itself against strong competition

The court contradicted this view of the EUIPO. The CJEU expressly pointed out that market participants in the food industry are characterised by strong competition and are all confronted with the technical constraints of packaging goods for their marketing and must observe the necessary labelling. That makes the appearance and design of the packaging all the more important in order to distinguish it from the competition. Accordingly, it must be held that the average consumer is fully capable of perceiving the bead-like ring and the aesthetic break edge as an indication of their commercial origin.

Moreover, although, as the EUIPO rightly pointed out, the bead which separates the upper part from the narrower lower part is a technical and functional characteristic, that characteristic nevertheless confers an aesthetic value on the mark applied for. The Court stated that the trade mark applied for was an unusual character, in the customary manner of the trade, of a presentation of the goods in question. The CJEU stressed that even with a minimum degree of distinctiveness, the ground for refusal did not apply, and such a minimum degree was certainly present in the present case.

Finally, the CJEU annulled the decision of the EUIPO and the previous trademark refusal. Above all, this judgement is remarkable because, on the one hand, the court considers the bead in the shape of the vessel to be a technical and functional feature, but on the other hand it regards this feature as an element for presentation with an extraordinary character.

In this context, the following judgments are also worth reading:

First Time in China: Chivas granted Judicial Protection for their 3D Mark

Ritter Sport retains protection of its quadratic three-dimensional trade mark

Nepresso coffee capsules lose trademark protection in Germany – for the moment

Technical function determines the design: Exclusion from IP rights?

 

Would you also like to protect your trademarks or brands?

Then please do not hesitate to contact us. Our patent attorneys and attorneys at law are experienced and highly qualified in all areas of intellectual property law, both nationally and internationally.

Request your call-back without any obligations!

CAT-call_en

 

Sources:

Curia Europe: EU:T:2018:638 (in German)

Picture:

PetraBlahoutova /pixabay.com / CCO License  

 

 

 

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconDesign Law,  International Intellectual Property,  Trademark Law Tag iconEUIPO,  Unionmark,  bottle shape,  3D,  3D brands,  origin,  packaging sector,  3D Unionmark,  Court of the European Union,  shape of a vessel,  visible bead,  aesthetic value,  unusual character,  relevant public,  distinctiveness

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Design Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Action against a patent already expired 26. February 2021
  • Design protection in China: Amendment 2021 25. February 2021
  • EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform 18. February 2021
  • BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest 16. February 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

25. February 2021
Design protection in China: Amendment 2021

Design protection in China: Amendment 2021

16. February 2021
BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest

BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest

16. February 2021
UK trademark after Brexit: earlier UK trademark in opposition

UK trademark after Brexit: earlier UK trademark in opposition

11. February 2021
EU figurative marks: Panthé figurative mark – a panther mark?

EU figurative marks: Panthé figurative mark – a panther mark?

9. February 2021
BGH ruling: Classe E versus German E-Klasse

BGH ruling: Classe E versus German E-Klasse

5. February 2021
Trade secret: what are ‘appropriate’ secrecy measures?

Trade secret: what are ‘appropriate’ secrecy measures?

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form