• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

POWER YOUR SPORT – slogans as German trademark

7. February 2022

Is it possible to protect slogans that have proven themselves to customers or in company advertising, for example, as a trademark? This often fails. The current decision of the German BPatG is all the more interesting: POWER YOUR SPORT as trademark for sports jerseys?

POWER YOUR SPORT – trademark for sports jerseys?

Wortfolgen mit Sport - Marke für Sporttrikot

This word sequence was applied for a colorful smorgasbord of goods in Nice Classes 03, 14, 18, 21 and 25, including, for example, sports jerseys and hoodies, tableware and cups, bags and watches, and cleaning and fragrance preparations.

In 2019, the Trademark Office had rejected this trademark application POWER YOUR SPORT for class 25 (inter alia, “sports jerseys” and “jackets as sportswear”), due to lack of distinctiveness and the existence of a need to keep free pursuant to § 8(2)(1) and (2), 37(1) Trademark Act: POWER YOUR SPORT would be directly understood by consumers as “drive your sport, support your sport” and would thus be impermissibly descriptive of the claimed goods in Nice class 25.

The trademark applicant appealed against this decision to the Federal Patent Court, which currently ruled on the matter (29 W (pat) 531/20). He argued that the slogan in dispute had to be translated differently, it meant “Supply / Provide your sport”. However, this is not a meaningful statement and is therefore not descriptive.

Case law according slogans

The Federal Patent Court therefore referred to the case law on slogans. The ECJ already ruled in 2012 that keyword-like word sequences are to be treated like other word signs in the assessment of distinctiveness and that slogans can also be trademarks despite the advertising message (ECJ, WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH, EU:C:2012:460). However, the ECJ also said in this judgment that it may be more difficult to prove the distinctiveness of the marks of certain categories.

Legendary is also the ECJ decision on the Audi slogan VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK, which the ECJ confirmed trademarkability – we reported. According to this, even slogans that are used for advertising purposes and even contain a factual statement to a greater or lesser extent can still be trademarkable.
The decisive factor here is that the slogan is not directly descriptive, i.e. that a consumer and customer must “think outside the box” a bit. A certain originality or conciseness must be included, the ECJ had explained, which requires a minimum of interpretation or triggers a thinking process in the relevant public.

The recent case law of the CFI also takes up this approach: The decisive factor is a subtle element in the advertising message, see CFI decision WET DUST CAN’T FLY of 2019.

Slogan without concrete information

However, this is what is happens in the term POWER YOUR SPORT, the BPatG said according to the present case. The BPatG decided that the term does not contain any specific information, nor can it be assumed that the sign is always perceived merely as an advertising statement without distinctive character. POWER YOUR SPORT was also not subject to the requirement of availability under § 8 (2) No. 2 MarkenG, because it was a term without clearly factual content.

The Federal Patent Court therefore upheld the trade mark applicant’s appeal in its entirety and overturned the trade mark division’s refusal. POWER YOUR SPORT cannot be denied a minimum degree of distinctiveness, the BPatG ruled.

Questions regarding trademark protection

Do you have questions regarding trademark protection or trademark search?


 

Sources: 

BPatG POWER YOUR SPORT, 29 W (pat) 531/20

Image:

planet_fox | pixabay | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconBPatG,  case law,  distinctive character,  federal patent court,  Power your Sport,  slogan as trademark,  slogan trademark,  Trademark,  word sequence,  word sequences as trademark

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© MD LEGAL Patentanwalt, European Patent Attorney PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.