• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Slogan under trademark protection – only with subtle element

8. April 2019

Achieving trademark protection for a slogan is difficult, but possible. The trade mark registration for the word mark “See More. Reach More. Treat More.” for medical devices was rejected by the European Court, but granted for the word mark “WET DUST CAN’T FLY” for cleaning and vacuum cleaner. A subtle element in the advertising message is decisive.


The delimitation in trademark protection for slogans is difficult, this lies in the descriptive nature of advertising messages. From the point of view of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), such a descriptive character lay in the word mark “See More. Reach More. Treat More.”.

In 2017, the applicant, the US company Medrobotics Corp., filed an application with the European Trade Mark Office (EUIPO) for that word mark in Nice Class 10 – Medical devices. Both the EUIPO examiner and the Board of Appeal rejected the desired trademark registration. “See More. Reach More. Treat More.” has only an obvious advertising significance for the relevant public. The mark applied for is devoid of any distinctive character in relation to the goods claimed.

Slogan can be worthy of protection – despite advertising message

The European Court upheld the refusal. In its current judgment, the CJEU made it clear that a slogan could certainly convey an advertising message, and could even be understood primarily as an advertising formula, without this having any influence on its distinctive character. However, it is a condition that a subtle element is found in the advertising message, that it has a certain originality which at least requires interpretation by the relevant public or triggers a cognitive process in the minds of that public. The court referred to the famous slogan of the German car manufacturer Audi “Vorsprung durch Technik” (in engl: “Progress through Technology”), whose trademark protection was confirmed by the European Court of Justice in 2010 (please notice also our article: “Slogan as a trademark? Difficult!”).

Examination of distinctiveness

A word mark consisting of several elements must be based on the overall perception of that mark. The relevant meaning of that mark must be determined on the basis of all its components and not only on one of them, the CFI clarified. In the context of the overall assessment, it may be useful to examine each of the elements making up the mark in question.

Slogan “WET DUST CAN’T FLY” under trademark protection

slogan for a robot vacuum cleanerMedrobotics Corp. claimed that the mark applied for required an interpretation of the goods in question which was no less demanding than that required for the mark WET DUST CAN’T FLY. The word mark “WET DUST CAN’T FLY” was granted trademark protection in 2015, inter alia for cleaning and vacuum cleaners (EU:T:2015:46). In this word mark, the CJEU had noted interpretative efforts on the part of consumers and had attested to the slogan a certain originality and a certain resonance, which made it easy to remember. An advertising slogan cannot be required to show “imagination” or even “conceptual tension” with a surprise effect in order to acquire distinctive character, the CJEU held in “WET DUST CAN’T FLY”.

However, in the slogan “See More. Reach More. Treat More.” there was no need for any interpretation, the CJEU clarified. Nor has the applicant adduced any evidence as to the manner in which the mark is sufficiently original to be classified as distinctive. According to the court, the word mark applied for lacks any need for interpretation, since it means that those goods enable more to be seen, more to be achieved and more to be treated – without the slightest reflection. That is directly linked to the function of the goods claimed, which are used in the context of medical and surgical diagnosis. The European Court confirmed the EUIPO’s previous refusals of this trademark application and dismissed the action in its entirety.

Would you also like to protect your trademark or brand?

Then please take your chance and contact us. Our patent attorneys and attorneys at law are experienced and highly qualified in all areas of intellectual property law, both nationally and internationally.

 

 

Sources:

Judement of the European Court “Slogan: See More. Reach More. Treat More.” EU:T:2019:213

Picture:

NickyPe /pixabay.com / CCO License  

 

 

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconCopyright,  Trademark Law Tag iconadvertising,  advertising slogan,  Advertising statement,  distinctivness,  medical devices,  Slogan,  subtle element,  trademark protection,  wordmark

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Copyright

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.