• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Illegal videos on Youtube – no disclosure of the e-mail

11. December 2020

If videos and film sequences are illegally uploaded to YouTube, this is a violation of the rights of the film owners. Legally, they can hardly take legal action against it, if the Youtube users act under aliases. The BGH now judges: no disclosure of the e-mail address can be demanded.

Youtube Illegales Hochladen

The BGH has now made its final ruling in the long-running Constantin Film Verleih vs. The core of the dispute is the illegal uploading of protected films and videos to the video platform YouTube.

Aliases are allowed according to the German Telemedia Act

Since the German Telemedia Act (§ 13 Abs. 6 TMG) allows users of internet platforms to register there under an alias, it is difficult or impossible for the rights holders of videos and films to punish an infringement by illegal uploading to YouTube. Although Constantin Film Verleih has a justified claim for injunction as well as a claim for damages against the infringers, the corresponding lawsuit cannot be addressed, since Constantin Film only knows the aliases.

The Constantin Film Distribution therefore demanded that Youtube – which as an Internet platform cannot be proactively prosecuted for rights violations on its platform – provide information about the infringers beyond the aliases, in particular the e-mail addresses stored on Youtube and the IP addresses used when uploading the illegal videos. But Youtube refused to do so.

BGH submitted interpretation of the term “address” to the ECJ

For the Federal Court of Justice, until this dispute was brought before it, the decisive question was what is meant by the term “addresses” according to EU Directive 2004/48 (Art. 8 para. 3). The BGH submitted this to the ECJ as a preliminary ruling.

The ECJ ruled on it in July 2020 – we reported. In its ruling, the ECJ determined that neither e-mail addresses nor telephone numbers fall within the term “address” and that there is therefore no obligation to provide information about this information for Internet platforms.

BGH: Duty of disclosure does not include e-mail

Accordingly yesterday then also the BGH judged: Youtube does not have to give the e-mail addresses of users with aliases, even in the case of obvious violations of the law by illegal uploading of videos.

This ruling thus confirms that YouTube – and other major online platforms – are not required to disclose the IP addresses, e-mail addresses or telephone numbers of their users, even if they have illegally downloaded or uploaded videos.

Youtube itself, incidentally, refers to the new “Content ID” system that the video platform has introduced. Behind this system is software that is claimed to be able to check whether a video to be uploaded matches a protected film sequence and then exclude it from uploading. This may have an effect on the video platform YouTube, but the fundamental discussion remains: Freedom of expression or piracy and hate speech?

Aliases: Freedom of speech or Piracy and Hate Speech?

The fundamental social discussion in the area of freedom of opinion – especially on the Internet – and the abuse of code names for product piracy, illegal uploading and file sharing as well as for hate speech and fake news has been going on for years and has reached the political level. According to the decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) of May 27, 2020, the Federal Government must draft a law to newly regulate the so-called inventory data information (1 BvR 1873/13, 1 BvR 2618/13).

The so-called “Hatespeech Act” is already available, but has not yet been drafted, i.e. de facto not yet in force. However, it is to be expected that this will happen next year 2021. In particular, the Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) provides for an obligation to report. This is primarily intended to improve the prosecution of hate crime on the net, and also aims to achieve close cooperation between law enforcement authorities and Internet platform operators such as Facebook, YouTube and TikTok.

Do you also want to protect intellectual property or copyright?

Our patent attorneys and IP attorneys will be happy to advise you. Please contact us if you are interested – we look forward to your call!

Sources: 

PressRelease of BGH, I ZR 153/17

Image:

TymonOziemblewski | pixabay.com | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Product- and Trademark piracy Tag iconalias,  alias allowed,  Constantin Film,  Contantin,  E-Mail,  e-mail address,  ECJ,  Hate Speech,  hate speech law,  illegal videos,  obligation to provide information,  obligation to provide information Youtube,  TMD,  uploading to Youtube,  user's e-mail address,  Youtube

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

14. February 2022
Crypto trading: NFT for luxury and art

Crypto trading: NFT for luxury and art

11. February 2022
Shipwreck for Iglo: lawsuit over figure Käpt’n Iglo

Shipwreck for Iglo: lawsuit over figure Käpt’n Iglo

28. January 2022
CFI: Intel rebate system – Intel successfull in legal dispute

CFI: Intel rebate system – Intel successfull in legal dispute

18. January 2022
Bundling of NRW court jurisdiction for IT and renewables

Bundling of NRW court jurisdiction for IT and renewables

4. January 2022
Classifications 2022: IPC, Nice and Locarno

Classifications 2022: IPC, Nice and Locarno

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© MD LEGAL Patentanwalt, European Patent Attorney PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.