• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Huawei and Verizon – FRAND patent dispute settled

29. July 2021

A few days ago and only shortly after the start of the trial in Texas for infringement claims in the FRAND patent dispute Huawei and Verizon both parties settle the patent dispute and the lawsuits – under confidential terms. One may assume how this was spurred:

Huawei und VerizonHuawei and Verizon are settling their patent lawsuits and reaching an agreement in the complex FRAND patent dispute. It is reasonable to assume that both parties were strongly influenced by the recent anti-suit injunction decisions as a defence in SEP and FRAND disputes. Moreover, it can be assumed that Huawei has achieved exactly what it set out to do in 2021: at the beginning of 2021, Huawei announced that it wanted to vigorously market its patent portfolio. Incidentally, this also fits in with the requirements of the Chinese government.

China: Patent marketing strategy

With the entry into force of the revision of patent law in China – we reported – the declared aim is to curb the influence of large technology companies in China and to ensure that innovations and data remain in the country. At the same time, there is relief for all foreign patent applicants who apply for patent protection in China for declared key technology.

Anti-Suit Injunction and Samsung v. Ericsson

However, for the settlement between Verizon and Huawei, the noteworthy decision of the Wuhan Intermediate Court of China from Christmas 2021 in the case of Samsung and Ericsson (Case ID: (2020) E 01 Zhi Min Chu 743) is certainly important. In it, the Chinese court declared its jurisdiction to set a global FRAND tariff in the licensing dispute between Ericsson and Samsung.
Samsung had applied to the Wuhan court in early December 2021 to set a global licence rate for Ericsson’s SEPs. Days later, Ericsson sued Samsung in the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Marshal Division) for breaching its obligation to license patents on FRAND terms – we reported.

This decision by the Wuhan Court set a new standard in global SEP litigation. This is because it prohibits Ericsson from seeking an injunction elsewhere to prevent Samsung from enforcing the Wuhan ASI. The Chinese judges thus ordered an ASI (anti-suit injunction) and an AAASI (anti-anti-suit injunction) at the same time.

This has turned into a jurisdictional and interpretive contest for ASIs between China and the US. For Ericsson ignored the clear and costly sanction threats from Wuhan and filed an AASI in the Texas District Court right after Christmas. The court provisionally allowed Ericsson to proceed with its FRAND action against Samsung and also extended this action on 12 January (Case ID: 2:20-CV-00380-JRG).

It is quite likely that Verizon and Huawei would have preferred to avoid such a global competition – all the more so as it is very attractive to contribute to the establishment of 5G instead of being hindered in market participation by injunctions.

Huawei and Verizon – both sides are satisfied

Huawei and Verizon were satisfied with the agreement reached, the terms are confidential, as was to be expected. The concrete agreements in the licence contracts for SEP patents are being guarded like the holy grail, because in terms of FRAND conditions, specifications for further contracts could be derived from already existing contracts. Of course, none of the telecommunications technology companies wants that.

There is more information public about the number of relevant patents. In the specific case of Huawei and Verizon, 12 standard-relevant patents (SEPs) were at issue, which Huawei allegedly used in Verizon’s infrastructure. Huawei had ordered Verizon in 2019 to pay royalties for the use of more than 230 Huawei patents, demanding more than US$1 billion (Reuters reported at the time). And also in 2019, the United States blacklisted Huawei over alleged national security concerns.
After nearly a year of negotiations, talks between the two companies broke down in January 2020, after which Huawei filed several infringement lawsuits against Verizon in Texas courts. Verizon then filed counterclaims against Huawei, accusing Huawei of patent infringement.

Both companies have now ended this patent dispute with a joint motion to dismiss all claims. An agreement was reached, under confidential terms.

Huawei is considered to have the most 5G-related standard-relevant patents of any company in the world. Huawei says it holds more than 100,000 active patents worldwide, including about 10,000 US patents. Even if the US (and others) deny Huawei access to their national 5G networks, Huawei is still in a very good position to earn good revenues from royalties – including from US companies.

Do you need support in patent protection or licensing issues?

Our attorneys have many years of expertise in patent law as well as in the entire field of intellectual property and are authorised to represent you before any court – in Germany and also internationally. We also have many years of experience and knowledge of the language and the country with regard to China and Chinese patent, design and trade mark law.
Please contact us if you are interested.


 

Sources:

Reuters from 12. July 2021

Imae:

farukgarib | pixabay | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconLizenzen,  Patent Law Tag icon5G,  ASI,  ericsson,  FRAND,  FRAND licence,  Huawei,  Huawei and Verizon,  infringement action,  licence offer,  licences,  royalties,  Samsung,  SEP,  standard-relevant patents,  US Court Texas,  Verizon,  Wuhan Intermediate Court of China

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Lizenzen

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.