• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Apple sues patent exploiter precautionary by declaratory action

8. February 2019

Apple anticipates a possible patent infringement lawsuit and files a declaratory judgment action before the California Court. Apple’s iPhones, iPads and Apple Watches do not infringe any patents for USB ports, the U.S. court is to clarify.

apple watchThe defendant FISI – a wholly owned subsidiary of the defendant FISI Holdings – claims to own all rights, title and interest in twelve FISI patents for USB charging. According to Apple, the defendants have made statements claiming that Apple infringes the patents.

In the statement of claim of the declaratory judgment, Apple alleges that FISI is a pure patent exploitation company established solely for the purpose of generating revenue from patent infringement claims, in particular royalty income.

Patent exploitation companies aim at license income

Patent exploiters can colloquially be referred to as patent trolls. Patent trolls themselves do not produce anything, but merely market industrial property rights and subsequently sue other companies that use the patented technologies without a valid license agreement (see also Apple is to pay 145 million dollars to “Patenttroll” WiLan).

Decision provides security

A proactive action for declaratory judgment is common in patent infringement disputes. This is because license payments are often also discussed in patent infringement proceedings. A lengthy procedure can lead to very high costs for the suspected infringer. A declaratory judgment can de-escalate the situation and eliminate this uncertainty.

FISI claimed through letters, complaint tables, telephone calls and personal meetings with Apple employees that certain Apple products violated the patents and that Apple needed a license for the patents, according to Apple’s declaratory action. There are twelve FISI patents for USB charging originally filed by Research in Motion, the manufacturer of the Blackberry.

Apple: No patent infringement by Apple’s Lightning® devices

With the declaratory action, Apple now wants to clarify in court that its own hardware does not infringe the patents taken over from FISI. The patent infringement relates to certain techniques for charging via USB and USB 2.0 ports, but Apple argues that iPhones use a Lightning port rather than a USB port.

In 2012, Apple introduced its proprietary 8-pin digital Lightning® in data and power connectivity technology. Apple’s power supplies and Lightning® devices do not violate these patents, Apple claims, including iPhones, iPads and Apple Watches. The required declaratory judgment before the United States District Court Northern District of California (5:19-cv-0068) is intended to confirm this assessment.

 

Would you also like to protect your patent or your brand?

Please take your chance and contact us. Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

CAT-call_en

Sources:

Apple vs FISI declaratory action 5:19-cv-0068

Picture:

charlie0111 /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Patent Law,  Product- and Trademark piracy,  Licenses Tag iconApple,  Patent,  BlackBerry,  iphone,  FISI,  apple watch,  Patent-Troll

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

14. February 2022
Crypto trading: NFT for luxury and art

Crypto trading: NFT for luxury and art

11. February 2022
Shipwreck for Iglo: lawsuit over figure Käpt’n Iglo

Shipwreck for Iglo: lawsuit over figure Käpt’n Iglo

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Torhaus Westhafen
Speicherstrasse 59
D – 60327 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]