• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Trial sample or no registration of wordmarks with descriptive content

28. September 2018

If words from normal usage are placed under trademark protection, the courts distinguish exactly. The Federal Patent Court ruled: no trademark protection for “trial sample”. However, registration was granted for pharmaceuticals, pharmaceutical products and preparations for health care.

trial sampleIn July 2013, a feed manufacturer applied for registration of “Trial sample (in German: “Schnupperprobe”)” as a trademark for, inter alia, goods of the following categories:

  • Class 3 (Cosmetic preparations for animals; animal perfumery; animal toilet preparations and cosmetics; essential oils, soaps, animal dentifrices and toilet preparations; animal oral hygiene preparations, not for medical purposes; animal shampoos)
  • Class 5 (dietetic foodstuffs for medical purposes, food supplements for medical purposes, dietetic substances for medical purposes; preceding goods for animal use) and Class 31 (feedingstuffs for animals and domestic animals, in particular for dogs, cats and horses)

The German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA) already refused to register the trade mark for these goods on the ground of lack of distinctive character pursuant to §8.2 German Trademark Law (MarkenG). It argued that the sign consisted of the linguistically correct combination of the word formation element “Schnupper- (in English: Trial)” derived from the verb “Schnuppern (in English: to try)” and the word “Probe (in English: sample)”. In the combination, the overall word “Trial sample (“Schnupperprobe”)” has, inter alia, the meaning “a sample for testing, trying out or getting to know” or the meaning “olfactory sample, sample for smelling by test”. Both are found to be purely descriptive by the DPMA.

However, registration was granted for medicinal products, pharmaceutical products and preparations for health care as well as for plasters and dressing materials.

Federal Patent Court decides: no trademark protection for “trial sample”

This decision was confirmed four years later by the Federal Patent Court (BPAtG, 30 W (pat) 27/15). Especially since the applicant also used the sign descriptively according to the findings of the court by publishing on her website the offer “trial sample – free of charge for your dog” (…) If you have not yet tried PLATINUM complete food for your dog, we will gladly send you a free trial sample with our three adult varieties (…))”. Obviously, the applicant wanted the exclusive rights to offer free samples and product samples as “trial samples”.

The decision of the Federal Patent Court is not surprising. The registration of trademarks with descriptive content regularly fails. The reason for this is that the trade should not be prevented from describing a product or service as what it is: in this case a trial sample.

Free distribution of medicinal products as “trial samples” is prohibited

pharmaceuticalsFree distribution of medicinal products “trial samples” is prohibited outside the professional circles. The fact that trademark registration was granted for pharmaceuticals, pharmaceutical products and preparations for health care as well as for plasters and bandaging material should not be of much use to the applicant. Because the free distribution of samples is forbidden outside the professional circles according to § 11 Act on the Advertising of Medical Products (Heilmittelwerbegesetz (HWG)) anyway, and a medicine will probably not want to bring it under this name rather on the market.

The procedure might have cost the applicant not only a lot of time, but also a lot of money. Also all money in the application of the obviously already used mark was invested free of charge, since now also each competitor may offer its product samples as trial samples.

These are more recent judgments concerning trade marks and a descriptive character: 

  • SHERPA versus SHERPA: Word mark identical or similar?
  • ALPINEWELTEN no Union Trade Mark: illustration not original enough
  • “Vienna House” lacks distinctiveness for hotel services
  • Is iGrill an interactive grill? Weber Grill cannot protect the word mark

Do you want help for trademark application? 

Our Patent Attorneys and Attorneys at Law bundle are experts in patent- and trademark law, national and international.
Please take your chance and contact us – a request for a call-back is non-binding:

CAT-call_en

Sources:

Juris BPatG 25 W (pat) 548/15

Pictures:

Plosion / Pixabay.com / CCO License

Alexas_Fotos / pixabay.com / CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconHealthcare & Lifesciences,  Trademark Law Tag iconadvertising,  BPatG,  distribution of medicinal products,  Heilmittelgesetz,  Medical Products,  Schnupperprobe,  Trademark,  trial samples,  wordmark

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Healthcare & Lifesciences

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

7. March 2022
BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt

BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.