• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

“Vienna House” lacks distinctiveness for hotel services

3. August 2018

Is the hotel name “Vienna House” descriptive? The EUIPO says “yes” and rejects the trademark registration. Because customers could expect the “typical Vienna style” in the “Vienna House” Hotel:

35 “Vienna House” Hotels in Europe

Hotelzimmer

Vienna International Hotelmanagement AG, headquartered in Vienna, operates 35 hotels and resorts in eight EU countries under the name “Vienna House”. In 2015 the Vienna AG filed the registration of the hotel name “Vienna House” as an EU trade mark in word and picture at the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). The entry should be made for the following Nice classes:

  • Class 39 (inter alia Services of a travel agency)
  • Class 41 (Operation of sports facilities)
  • Class 43 (inter alia hotel services)

However, the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO rejected the registration for classes 39 and 43 because the mark applied for is descriptive and would therefore have no distinctive character for the services concerned. The Board of Appeal justified the decision by stating that there is a “typical Vienna style” in the Vienna hotel and food service industry, which is associated with great tradition and a particularly good reputation. For a hotel service named “Vienna House”, customers could assume that they are expecting this particular Viennese atmosphere.

Vienna AG challenges the EUIPO decision and argues:

  1. that the sign consisting of the terms “Vienna” and “House” is grammatically incorrect in English and thus has no sense
  2. that there is no “Vienna style” with which customers could build an association

EUIPO rejects challenge

In its judgment, the First Board of Appeal stated that the applicant was wrong in its first point. The term “Vienna House” is correct according to the grammatical rules of English and is understood by the English-speaking average consumer as the “Viennese House”.

In the “Vienna style” discussion, the First Board of Appeal confirms the view of the Fourth Board of Appeal. The “Vienna style” is mainly build by the Viennese coffee house culture. Vienna AG commissioned a report from a university in Vienna to prove that such a “Viennese style” did not exist. However, this report was not admitted to court.

The Board of Appeal therefore maintains that consumers who use a hotel service called “Vienna House” expect a hotel (regardless of location) in the typical Vienna style or at least expect a specific Viennese atmosphere. Thus, the term ‘Vienna House’ clearly describes the services in Classes 39 and 43. As a result, the signs in question have no distinctive character and can not be registered as an EU trade mark.

 

Are you interested in national or international brand or trademark protection?

Please take your chance and contact us. Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

 

 

Sources:

Curia Europe: T:2018:401 Vienna House vs EUIPO

Images:

davidlee770924 / pixabay.com / CCO License | MartinaFotos / pixabay.com / CCO License

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconNice class,  EUIPO,  Board of Appeal,  ECLI:EU:T:2018:401,  Vienna House,  First Board of Appeal

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

10. February 2022
CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Torhaus Westhafen
Speicherstrasse 59
D – 60327 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]