• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

OLG Munich: Golden Lindt easterbunny no color mark 

25. August 2020

Chocolate manufacturer Lindt experiences a setback in court. Lindt tried in vain to protect the gold of the golden easterbunny as a color mark. The famous Lindt golden rabbit is for the time being still not under trademark protection.

Golden Lindt RabbitLindt has been trying for many years to obtain trademark protection for the famous Golden Rabbit. For years, the attempt to obtain comprehensive protection as a 3D trademark was considered a failure before all instances, a process which was taken to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). Rabbits, however, were part of the typical range of shapes of chocolate products, the judges had judged in relation to the 3 D mark sought, especially as an Easter bunny. And the elements of the mark applied for (shape, gold foil and red ribbon with bells) could not give the mark any distinctive character.

Searching for protection as colour trademark

This judgement is already 10 years old, after which Lindt changed the protection strategy. The Swiss chocolate manufacturers were now trying to protect the color gold in the golden rabbit (color shade CIELAB 86.17, 1.56, 41.82) as a colour trademark. The gold colour shown on the packaging foil of the chocolate bunnies is so well known through years of intensive advertising and use that this gold color is generally associated with the Lindt Golden Rabbit / Easterbunny.

In first instance, the Regional Court Munich I had also found this argument conclusive and recognized the gold color of the chocolate bunny as a so-called usage color trademark (33 O 13884/18). This was also supported by a study, which Lindt let create to the admittingness of the gold hare and according to that over 70 per cent of the Germans know the gold rabbit.

But the OLG Munich decided with its only now published judgement of 30 July 2020 (29 U 6389/19) against Lindt and for the process opponent Viba Sweet, which took over the Confiserie Heilemann and also the mark controversy around the gold color in 2016. The OLG admitted that abstract colour trademarks can also be protected as usage trademarks if they have gained recognition in the market.

However, the golden shade in the Lindt golden rabbit has not acquired any reputation for the product chocolate rabbits, the court decided. Something else did not result also from the caught up traffic appraisal. Because Lindt does not generally use the golden color for chocolate bunnies, for which the color is supposed to enjoy protection, but only for a very well-known and successful product, namely the Lindt Golden Rabbit. This Lindt golden rabbit is sold in different sizes and flavors, but always in the same color and shape.

OLG denies the Lindt gold colour a traffic eligibility

However, to the extent that a trade acceptance of an abstract color mark has been assumed in the case law up to now, these were cases in which the companies have used a certain color as a corporate color for various products of the goods or service sector for which color mark protection was claimed and not only for a specific product, explained the OLG Munich and reminded of the Sparkassen red and Nivea blue.

The court denied the Lindt golden rabbit a traffic reputation therefore. A consumer would not assign according to opinion of the OLG a hare wrapped in gold foil, which looks otherwise completely differently than the Lindt gold hare, straight to the “enterprise Lindt” since he knows their “gold hares”.

The judges of the OLG stressed that they were due to the constant occupation with characteristic and competition disputes in a the position to judge the traffic understanding – and added humorously that they belong likewise to the addressed public, i.e. as potential buyers of chocolate hares.

Whether this was the last word in this case remains to be seen. Because the way to the next instance (BGH) is open to Lindt.

Would you also like to protect your trademark or brand?

Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

 

Sources:

Judgement of OLG Munich (in German)

Image:

Efraimstochter | pixabay | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconabstrakte Farbe,  Benutzungsfarbmarke,  Farbmarke,  Farbmarke Gold,  Goldhase,  Lindt GOLDHASE

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© MD LEGAL Patentanwalt, European Patent Attorney PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.