• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Malle no longer an EU word mark

28. May 2020

Malle has been declared invalid as an EU word mark. Since 2004, the term Malle was a protected EU word mark, which was used to make license claims and warnings. Nevertheless, trademark protection for “Malle” is still valid; the judgement is not yet final and proceedings against the German word mark are also underway in GER.

Malle keine EU Marke

Mr. Jörg Lück from Hilden (Germany) had already had “Malle” protected as a German word and picture trademark (DE 30146994) in 2001 and as a European word trademark since 2004 (EM 002631166). The designation “Malle” is protected for the following goods and services:

  • Sound carriers (Nice class: 9);
  • Broadcasting of television and radio broadcasts (Nice class 38);
  • advertising (Nice class: 35);
  • entertainment; sporting and cultural activities; party organisation, party performance; running a discotheque; production of audio files (Nice Class 41)

With the decision of 18 May 2020, EUIPO has now declared the EU word mark Malle invalid. The EUIPO found that there was an absolute ground for refusal because the word “Malle” was a word of the general standard language. Furthermore, it is decisive that the German public would clearly understand the word “Malle” as a geographical reference to the island of Mallorca.

However, that decision is not yet final. And the proceedings before the Düsseldorf Regional Court have not yet been decided either, where the German word and figurative mark is being heard. In this respect, the trademark protection for Malle is still to be observed for the time being and any warnings regarding “Malle” are still legal.

Trademark registration “Malle” for warnings

The entrepreneur from Hilden used the trademark registration of the term “Malle” for license claims and for warnings against commercial use of the term. For example, the German travel blog “Reisetiger” was warned, where the word “Malle” was used several times in an article.

A licence claim was also submitted to a caterer who organised a party under the motto “Malle for everyone”. This gastronomer refused. In his opinion, “Malle” is the common abbreviation for Mallorca.

Malle- short form for Mallorca or party island?

This is now the decisive aspect in the “Malle” case before the Düsseldorf Regional Court. Does one associate “Malle” primarily with the island of Mallorca or as a synonym for a certain way of celebrating parties? This question determines whether “Malle” is descriptive as a trademark.

The EUIPO has decided this in its decision (Ref.: 32 783 C) and clearly sees the word “Malle” as a geographical reference to the island of Mallorca.

What to do in case of a warning?

As long as the trademark protection for malls continues to exist, a warning notice is legal and must always be observed. However, we would like to point out that trademark protection always refers to commercial use. The purely private use of the terms “Malle” can therefore not be subject to a warning.

In addition, the term “Malle” is the subject of pending proceedings. All the more reason for us to recommend the advice of an experienced lawyer for warning law, as our law firm is happy to offer, should you receive a warning and a demand for payment.


 

Sources: 

Decision of EUIPO Az.: 32 783 C

Image:

casischatz | pixabay.com | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag icondecision,  EU Trademark,  EUIPO,  license claim,  Malle,  no more EU trademark,  trademark void,  void,  warning,  word trademark Malle

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.