• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

BGH protects “Hohenlohe pig” – independent of EU rules for g.t.A.

30. July 2021

The German Federal Supreme Court confirms German trademark protection for the “Hohenloher pig” – as a collective mark. This has effect for all collective marks, because even if a product is not protectable as a European protected geographical indication like g.t.A. , it can be protected as a German collective mark.

Hohenloher LandschweinIndeed, the BGH says with its judgement (judgement of 29.07.2021, ref. I ZR 163/19) that national protection for collective marks applies in parallel and independently of the provisions of European law. An interesting judgement, not only with regard to collective marks.

Different requirements for collective marks in DE and EU

The background to this trademark dispute about the “Hohenloher pig” is based on the different requirements for collective geographical protection in the EU and in Germany.

Basically, the EU provides for three different quality marks for regional specialities, which are mainly oriented towards the geographically bound or traditionally geographically attached production steps:

  • Protected Designation of Origin
  • Protected geographical indication (g.t.A.)
  • Traditional speciality guaranteed

In addition, the EU protection system also covers designations of origin from countries that are not members of the EU if they are also protected in their country of origin. For more information on EU collective marks, please read here: EU designation of origin: Dresdner Christstollen also protected internationally?

Under German trademark law, in turn, goods can be protected as collective marks if they are distinguishable from products of other companies because of their geographical origin and if they have a special quality (see above all § 127 MarkenG).

Producers’ association: German collective trademark for Hohenloher Landschwein

This is precisely what the Bäuerliche Erzeugergemeinschaft Schwäbisch Hall (in engl.: Schwäbisch Hall Farmers’ Producers’ Association) relies on for its labels “Hohenloher Landschwein” and “Hohenloher Weiderind”. The protection of Hohenlohe livestock as so-called collective brands under German law is subject to strict specifications for feeding, keeping and slaughtering the animals, which are filed with the German Patent and Trademark Office. However, a butcher’s shop in the region did not meet these requirements, but still used the Hohenlohe label. Therefore, the Schwäbisch Hall Farmers’ Producers’ Association took legal action against the butcher’s shop. The producer association wanted to prohibit the butchery from using the “Hohenloher Landschwein” and “Hohenloher Weiderind” labels.

This was successful; the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court ruled in favour of the producer group in 2019. Yesterday, the appeals against the rulings were decided by the Federal Supreme Court. And the BGH rejected the butchery’s appeals and confirmed the trademark protection for the collective trademark “Hohenloder Landschwein” and “Hohenloder Weiderind”.

De facto, this means that only the farms of the Schwäbisch Hall producer association (around 1500 farms) are allowed to advertise with the “Hohenloder Landschwein” and “Hohenloder Weiderind” labels – and the producer association can actually prohibit the butchery from using these labels.

Conclusion

Both parties see the BGH ruling “Hohenloder Landschwein” as strengthening consumer protection. The producers’ association sees the positive signal for the regional quality of the products, which has been practised there for decades. The losing butchery, on the other hand, sees above all an expansion of the monopoly position of producer associations. According to the butchery, strict quality criteria of the EU would no longer be observed if protection could be created much more easily and without such a quality connection via national law.

In any case, this BGH ruling means that even if a product cannot be protected as European “protected geographical indication”, it may be protected as a German collective mark. This decision is therefore important for all producers of geographical products.

Are you also looking for protection for your product?

Our lawyers will advise you individually and develop the right strategy to protect your trademark together with you. We have many years of expertise in trade mark law as well as in the entire field of intellectual property and are entitled to represent you before any court – in Germany and also internationally.
Please contact us if you are interested.


 

Sources: 

SWR, BGH I ZR 163/19

Image:

mcpetz | pixabay | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconagricultural,  Black Forest Ham,  Cheese,  collective trademark,  designation of origin 'protected geographical indication',  Hohenloher Landschwein,  Hohenloher Weiderind,  meat,  PGI,  products,  protected geographical indication,  Weiderind

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© MD LEGAL Patentanwalt, European Patent Attorney PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.