• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

UPC without UK!

27. February 2020

Even before it has entered into force, the entire UPC project – the European Unitary Patent Court – is being called into question: UPC without UK! The UK will not be part of the UPC, Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s office announced.

UPC without UKUPC – the Unified European Patent Court

The Unified Patent Court has been conceived and contractually established exclusively for the Member States of the EU. The aim is to unify patent law and legislation in the EU, analogous to the successful development and European harmonisation of trademark and design law. The current EU patent is – contrary to its name – neither limited to EU member states nor is it uniform. It must be validated in each individual country and must also assert itself before the national patent courts.

With the new EU unitary patent, all this will change: the EU unitary patent will only be valid in the EU member states, with one application for the EU.

However, the unitary patent and the Unified Patent Court are ultimately also about the transfer of national sovereign rights. This led to a constitutional complaint in Germany, which prevented the UPC from coming into force for years – and to Boris Johnson’s denunciation of the UPC.

UPC without UK – no alternative for UK

The British “No” to the UPC is not really surprising. After all, the UK’s constant support for the UPC came mainly from the period before the Brexit vote and from Theresa May’s time in office. However, since the UK would have to recognise and take along with it all the obligations of the UPC Treaty (including the primacy of Union law and the supreme responsibility for interpretation primarily by the CJEU, but ultimately by the ECJ), there is no longer any consent to be achieved in the UK: the UPC without the UK.

UPC without UK – what now?

Only two months ago, Alexander Ramsay, head of the preparatory committee for the European Patent Court (Unified Patent Court (UPC)), emphasised that the UPC could begin almost immediately if ratification finally took place in Germany.

In fact, the UK’s decision basically calls the entire UPC project into question. The UK, with its more than 60 million inhabitants and a large number of targeted patent applications, is a great loss for the UPC. Whether it will also be a loss for the UK remains to be seen. In the end, patent applicants will still have to distinguish whether they want to file a patent application in the Union states and / or in the UK.

Do you want to protect or defend your invention?

Our attorneys will be happy to advise you. If you are interested, please contact us – we look forward to hearing from you!

 

Sources:

Announcement of EU parlament

Image:

daniel_diaz_bardillo | pixabay | CCO License

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag iconBrexit,  UK,  UPC,  UPC without UK

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.