• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Patent no longer defended – Invalidity of patent ex tunc

2. September 2019

If a defendant in invalidity proceedings for a patent decides to no longer defend the patent in dispute, this is a permissible self-restriction. However, this leads to the invalidity of the patent ex tunc – i.e. from the beginning, the BPatG ruled.

Streitpatent nicht mehr verteidigtIn invalidity proceedings for the EU patent “Semiconductor Radiation Emitter Package” for the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany (2 Ni 41/17 (EP)), which were before the Federal Patent Court (BPatG), the defendant no longer defended the patent in dispute. This is permissible by way of self-restriction, but has far-reaching consequences for the patent in dispute.

If a patent in dispute is no longer defended as a whole, it must be declared invalid – without any substantive examination and from the beginning.

The facts

The case before the Federal Patent Court concerned nullity proceedings for the EU patent “Semiconductor Radiation Emitter Package” with patent specification EP 1 169 735 B1 for the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany. The claims of the patent were mainly directed at a semiconductor device which emits optical radiation.

The action was based on the invalidity ground of lack of patentability (Art. II § 6 para. 1 IntPatÜG in conjunction with Art. 138 para. 1 lit. a) EPC), in particular the lack of novelty (Art. 54 EPC) and inventive step (Art. 56 EPC).

In these proceedings, the defendant withdrew its opposition and requested a written procedure. The applicant had not objected to the written procedure requested by the defendant and had therefore implicitly agreed.

Therefore, the Court could decide on the action without oral proceedings by judgment pursuant to Sec. 82 (3), 2nd sentence, Patent Law.

Annul without substantive examination

If a defendant declares that he no longer wishes to defend the fully contested patent, this constitutes, according to settled case-law, an effective limitation of the subject-matter of the invalidty  proceedings, the Court explained. Since, however, a substantive examination can only take place within the limits set by the patents in dispute, such a self-limitation of the defendant leads to the fact that the patent in dispute is to be declared null and void without further substantive examination.

The BPatG clarified that this is justified by the idea of procedural economy and serves to avoid an isolated limitation procedure otherwise required under Sec. 64 Patent Law.

Patent is declared invalid ex tunc

The patent is not only declared null and void from the time of challenge – this would be called “ex nunc” – but it is considered null and void “ex tunc” and thus from the beginning. For the nullity of the patent in dispute has the consequence that pursuant to § 22 (2) in conjunction with § 21 (3) German Patent Law is deemed not to have occurred from the outset – in effect of the patent in dispute and also of the application for registration of the patent in dispute.

This is also the European rule under the European Patent Convention (EPC). If a European patent is revoked or limited in opposition, limitation or invalidity proceedings, the patent is deemed not to have occurred from the outset.

The situation is different with the waiver of a patent. In Germany, a waiver is declared at the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA) pursuant to § 20 (1) No. 1 PatG. The waiver of a patent applies ex nunc, i.e. the patent protection no longer exists from the date of the waiver.

At the European level, the waiver or lapse of the patent also applies ex nunc (i.e. from the date of the waiver), while the revocation applies ex tunc (i.e. as not having occurred from the beginning) in accordance with Art. 68 EPÜ.

The opponent may therefore have an interest in revocation if a patent expires or is surrendered.

Do you need assistance to protect or defend your patent?

Our attorneys have many years of expertise in patent law and trademark law and are entitled to represent you before any court in Germany as well as internationally.
If you are interested, please contact us.

 

 

 

Sources: 

Judgement of  BPatG 2 Ni 41/17 (EP)

Image:

Collage of our own using geralt / pixabay.com / CCO License (Karate) und geralt / pixabay.com / CCO License (sun down)

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag iconBPatG,  EPC,  EU-Patent,  European Patent,  ex nunc,  ex tunc,  expiration of patent,  federal patent court,  invalid ex tunc,  invalidity,  judgment,  limitation of patent,  limitation proceedings,  nullity proceedings,  opposition proceedings,  renunciation of patent,  revocation,  Sec. 22 PatA,  waiver of a patent.,  withdrew its opposition

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.