• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Milder sanctions for Apple in dispute against VirnetX

5. November 2018

Last turn in the eight-year battle between Apple and VirnetX over key patents in communications technology: Apple has been given milder penalties in the patent dispute – but remains guilty of patent infringement.

VirnetX a patent troll?

Apple and VirnetX have been fighting for the key patents for communications technology in court since 2010. This patent battle is particularly spicy because the patent owner and plaintiff VirnetX is seen by some as a possible patent troll. The listed VirnetX™ Holding Corporation, headquartered in Zephyr Cove, Nevada, is an Internet security software and technology company that owns a portfolio of patents, but does not necessarily manufacture products based on these patents itself. VirnetX offers collaboration applications, messaging services and security services. VirnetX has been conducting patent infringement lawsuits against the big names in communications technology for many years, including Apple, Cisco and Microsoft, for example.

Several lawsuits and appeals

Apple versus VirnetXThe accusation against Apple is that the iPhone manufacturer infringed four of the VirnetX patents in connection with Internet-based communication. In detail, it is mainly about Apple’s VPN on Demand technology, FaceTime and iMessage. These services are estimated to be included in more than 400 million devices marketed by Apple. Therefore, the litigation is lengthy, several lawsuits are pending and numerous appeals. Apple had already lost to VirnetX every time in previous judgments and had been sentenced to high damages, for example over $439 million in October 2017.

500 Mio Dollar claim for damages against Apple in 2018

However, the last spectacular judgement took place in April 2018. A Texas jury awarded $500 million in damages to plaintiff VirnetX and also determined that Apple’s violation was intentional – making further and increased claims for damages against Apple possible.

At the end of August, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas published the judge’s verdict on this decision. The jury’s verdict and the damages claim against Apple were upheld, but any injunction, embargo on sales or imports, and – equally important for Apple – increased damages for intentional patent infringement were rejected. The judge granted a current and concrete royalty that Apple had to pay to the plaintiff (“sunset royalty” of $1.20 per iPhone, iPad or Mac). Apple thus escaped significantly higher penalties.

Apple and VirnetX then entered into a concrete agreement that Apple would pay a total of $93 million to VirnetX – only for bill of costs and payment of interest, as VirnetX™ Holding Corporation announced in a press release on September 24, 2018.

Further turns possible

The payment of damages from the Texas ruling would be added there – if the ruling were not overturned. Apple could appeal against the April 2018 ruling to a higher court. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington is also currently examining cases in which the Patent Trial and Appeal Board claims that the patents in question are invalid, including various cases of VirnetX versus Apple. It remains possible that the judgment could ultimately be overturned.

Would you also like to protect or defend your brand or patent?

Then please do not hesitate to contact us. Our patent attorneys and attorneys at law are experienced and highly qualified in all areas of intellectual property law, both nationally and internationally.

Request your call-back without any obligations!

CAT-call_en

 

Sources:

US District Court of Eastern Texas VirnetX vs. Apple

PR News Wire – VirnetX

Picture:

fredericomeyer /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law,  Product- and Trademark piracy,  Licenses Tag iconApple,  Patent-Troll,  patent battle,  Patents,  royalty,  patent trial and appeal board,  us court of appeals,  Licensing agreement,  penalties,  payment of damages,  ruling,  US District Court Texas,  $500 million,  VirnetX,  facetime,  iMessage,  last turn,  sunset royalty

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Own trademark application fails – despite comparable trademarks: Equal treatment? 5. March 2021
  • Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment 5. March 2021
  • BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor? 2. March 2021
  • Suspension of infringement proceedings 1. March 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

5. March 2021
Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment

Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment

2. March 2021
BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor?

BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor?

26. February 2021
Action against a patent already expired

Action against a patent already expired

18. February 2021
EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

15. February 2021
Employee’s invention in insolvency

Employee’s invention in insolvency

12. February 2021
Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form