• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
      • Eva Maria Amoah
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Milder sanctions for Apple in dispute against VirnetX

5. November 2018

Last turn in the eight-year battle between Apple and VirnetX over key patents in communications technology: Apple has been given milder penalties in the patent dispute – but remains guilty of patent infringement.

VirnetX a patent troll?

Apple and VirnetX have been fighting for the key patents for communications technology in court since 2010. This patent battle is particularly spicy because the patent owner and plaintiff VirnetX is seen by some as a possible patent troll. The listed VirnetX™ Holding Corporation, headquartered in Zephyr Cove, Nevada, is an Internet security software and technology company that owns a portfolio of patents, but does not necessarily manufacture products based on these patents itself. VirnetX offers collaboration applications, messaging services and security services. VirnetX has been conducting patent infringement lawsuits against the big names in communications technology for many years, including Apple, Cisco and Microsoft, for example.

Several lawsuits and appeals

Apple versus VirnetXThe accusation against Apple is that the iPhone manufacturer infringed four of the VirnetX patents in connection with Internet-based communication. In detail, it is mainly about Apple’s VPN on Demand technology, FaceTime and iMessage. These services are estimated to be included in more than 400 million devices marketed by Apple. Therefore, the litigation is lengthy, several lawsuits are pending and numerous appeals. Apple had already lost to VirnetX every time in previous judgments and had been sentenced to high damages, for example over $439 million in October 2017.

500 Mio Dollar claim for damages against Apple in 2018

However, the last spectacular judgement took place in April 2018. A Texas jury awarded $500 million in damages to plaintiff VirnetX and also determined that Apple’s violation was intentional – making further and increased claims for damages against Apple possible.

At the end of August, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas published the judge’s verdict on this decision. The jury’s verdict and the damages claim against Apple were upheld, but any injunction, embargo on sales or imports, and – equally important for Apple – increased damages for intentional patent infringement were rejected. The judge granted a current and concrete royalty that Apple had to pay to the plaintiff (“sunset royalty” of $1.20 per iPhone, iPad or Mac). Apple thus escaped significantly higher penalties.

Apple and VirnetX then entered into a concrete agreement that Apple would pay a total of $93 million to VirnetX – only for bill of costs and payment of interest, as VirnetX™ Holding Corporation announced in a press release on September 24, 2018.

Further turns possible

The payment of damages from the Texas ruling would be added there – if the ruling were not overturned. Apple could appeal against the April 2018 ruling to a higher court. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington is also currently examining cases in which the Patent Trial and Appeal Board claims that the patents in question are invalid, including various cases of VirnetX versus Apple. It remains possible that the judgment could ultimately be overturned.

Would you also like to protect or defend your brand or patent?

Then please do not hesitate to contact us. Our patent attorneys and attorneys at law are experienced and highly qualified in all areas of intellectual property law, both nationally and internationally.

Request your call-back without any obligations!

CAT-call_en

 

Sources:

US District Court of Eastern Texas VirnetX vs. Apple

PR News Wire – VirnetX

Picture:

fredericomeyer /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law,  Product- and Trademark piracy,  Licenses Tag iconApple,  Patent-Troll,  patent battle,  Patents,  royalty,  patent trial and appeal board,  us court of appeals,  Licensing agreement,  penalties,  payment of damages,  ruling,  US District Court Texas,  $500 million,  VirnetX,  facetime,  iMessage,  last turn,  sunset royalty

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

14. February 2022
Crypto trading: NFT for luxury and art

Crypto trading: NFT for luxury and art

11. February 2022
Shipwreck for Iglo: lawsuit over figure Käpt’n Iglo

Shipwreck for Iglo: lawsuit over figure Käpt’n Iglo

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Torhaus Westhafen
Speicherstrasse 59
D – 60327 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]