• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Employee’s invention with software

23. March 2021

With increasing automation in companies, Employee’s invention with software is also becoming more common. How should the amount of the remuneration claim be determined in accordance with German ArbEG? And is there anything to consider about anEmployee’s invention in an international firm?

Employee’s invention with softwareSince an Employee’s invention involving software usually flows into a production process as a sub-area or into in-house automation, the amount of the remuneration claim is not easy to determine – all the more so if this software invention is used throughout the group.

Employee’s invention with software

When we deal here with the aspect of a service invention involving software, the patentability of this software invention is of course a prerequisite. For only a protectable invention is covered by the Employee Act, because only a protectable invention can confer a monopoly right on the employer (see § 9, 33 German PatG). The claim to remuneration for the an Employee’s inventor is derived from this monopoly right in accordance with the German Employee Invention Act (Arbeitnehmererfindergesetz (ArbEG).

Classically, the amount of the remuneration claim for a protectable service invention depends on the economic exploitability of the service invention (i.e. licensing, sale or internal use) in addition to the position of the employee inventor in the company. However, since a service invention involving software is in most cases a sub-area of production or automation, a relevant reference value for the remuneration claim must be determined. There are legal requirements for this through decisions of the German Arbitration Board.

Smallest functional unit = reference value

In principle, the smallest so-called technical-economic functional unit must be determined in such cases; this refers to the functional area of the invention which is substantially characterised by the invention or which is influenced in its function. Ultimately, the pure software module within the invention can also be a sufficient reference value. In concrete terms, this could be calculated either via the licence analogy or via the investment costs in the invention.

Case law: Method with software-based control

An example of this is the computer-implemented invention for processes that control controllers on the software side. Such an invention is patentable and can theoretically lead to a very high remuneration burden for the employer in the case of worldwide operational use in an international group, by adding several licence rates possibly to licence rates of 100 % or even more (namely if the software module contains several Employee’s inventions subject to remuneration).

However, this is not permissible; a calculatory overcharging of the products by a licence charge is excluded. If several inventions have an influence on a reference value, the individual licence rates may not be added up. Rather, the individual licence rates are to be included in the maximum licence rate according to their significance, i.e. divided among them.

The theoretically highest licence burden is limited by the competitiveness of the product in the market environment.
In practice, the Arbitration Board decided for such cases in a simplified way to double the average licence rate and to set this as the maximum licence rate.

Maintenance contracts for an Employee’s invention with software

Software that is sold as a product is usually conveyed to the customer with some kind of maintenance. How does maintenance affect the remuneration of an Employee’s invention with software?

In short: as a rule, almost nothing. Neither as increased turnover nor as an increased licence rate can maintenance contracts be translated into concrete remuneration. Only as a matter of principle is the turnover from products according to the invention to be taken into account in the context of maintenance and servicing.

Patent application only abroad

Of course, it is also possible that an Employee’s invention involving software (of an employee in Germany) is not filed for a patent in Germany at all, but only in the USA, for example. This is also regulated by the ArbEG, namely by § 14 (2) ArbEG. In short: a patent application abroad also secures monopoly rights of the employer and is subject to rules of an Employee’s invention.

In this context, there is to add that there is no remuneration claim from licensing of an LOT network.

Further questions regarding an Employee’s invention on software, AI or industrial robots?

Our attorneys have many years of expertise in patent law and employee invention law and are authorised to represent you before any office or court in Germany as well as internationally. We would also like to point out the limitation periods in employee invention law.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you are interested.

Sources: 

Decision Arb.Erf. 61/10

Image:

pexels | pixabay.com | CCO License

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag iconAI,  ArbEG,  employee's invention,  Employee’s invention with software,  German,  German ArbEG,  Germany,  Maintenance contracts,  method,  Patent,  patentability,  robots,  Software,  software-based

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.