• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Appeal proceedings before the EPO: Amendments of the Rules of Procedure

18. February 2020

On 1 January 2020 a recast of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal entered into force. It will also be applied to pending appeal cases in appeal proceedings before the EPO. Changes in the appeal procedure will be more difficult from now on.

Amendments to requests in appeal proceedings

appeal proceedingsThe most important changes of the RPBA 2020 (Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA)) concern the admissibility of changes to the applications in the appeal procedure.
The previous three-tier structure of an appeal procedure will be maintained in the new RPBA 2020, but it will become more difficult to change the appeal case at each stage.

In particular, the new Article 12(4) RPBA makes it more difficult to introduce changes in the appeal, as it extends the Boards of Appeal’ discretion not to admit anything that is not based on the claims, arguments and evidence on which the first instance decision is already based. The former Article 12(4) has now been extended to paragraphs 4 to 6.

However, the Boards of Appeal have so far rarely included new documents in the appeal proceedings under Article 12 of the Rules of Procedure. Therefore, the new Article 12 of the Rules of Procedure in a certain sense only reflects more precisely and in a more defined manner what has been the practice so far.

When amending Article 11 of the Boards of Appeal, it is expected that this will shorten the duration of the appeal procedures. It remains to be seen how this will be reflected in practice.

New version of the Rules of Procedure applies with immediate effect

In addition, the new rules of the RPBA 2020 Rules of Procedure apply with immediate effect, i.e. since their entry into force on 1 January 2020, and therefore only those provisions that specifically govern the initial and final phases, i.e. the first and third stages of the appeal procedure, are excluded from immediate application of the RPBA 2020 (Article 12(4) to (6) and 13(2) RPBA 2020). Transitional provisions apply to the initial and final phases, since a change in the rules of procedure may of course affect submissions already submitted.

Transitional rules for submission of the appeal before 1 January 2020

According to these transitional provisions, the new Article 12(4) of the FPBA will not apply in the first stage described above to all cases of complaint or reply thereto if the complaint was lodged before 1 January 2020. Similarly, the new Article 13(2) RPBA will not apply in the third stage if the summons or communication under Rule 100(2) EPC was served before 1 January 2020.

However, the intermediate stage, i.e. the second stage of appeal proceedings, will be dealt with immediately under the new Rule in Article 25(1) RPBA 2020. Previously, it was at the discretion of the Board of Appeal not to allow any change in the appeal case at this stage, but from now on this discretion will depend on the grounds for the change.

Remittal will be less frequent

In the previous version of the Rules of Procedure, which was valid until the end of 2019, the Boards of Appeal had a relatively large margin of discretion in deciding whether to remit appeal cases to the first instance. This often resulted in referrals back to the first instance when unresolved aspects of patentability became relevant. A classic example was the revocation of a patent at first instance due to lack of novelty – but without assessment of inventive step in the first instance proceedings. If the Board of Appeal subsequently annulled the first instance decision on novelty, the case was referred back to the first instance to have the inventive step assessed.

The new Article 11 RPBA aims at limiting the number of referrals. Art. 11 RPBA stipulates that the Board of Appeal shall only refer a case back to the Board of Appeal in special circumstances. A corresponding special reason is given if the proceedings show substantial deficiencies. However, the Board could and may still invoke Article 13 of the RPBA and allow changes in the party’s submissions.

It follows that the Boards of Appeal will from now on take a final decision in appeal proceedings much more frequently than before. Changes in the appeal procedure will from now on become much more difficult and only with good reasoning in the appeal under Article 12(4).

Do you wish to defend your patent internationally?

Our attorneys have many years of expertise in patent law as well as in the entire field of intellectual property and are entitled to represent you before any court – in Germany and also internationally.
Please contact us if you are interested.


 

Sources: 

Amendments of the Rules of Procedure in appeal proceedings

Image:

own Picture Mix of Hans | pixabay | CCO License and mohamed_hassan | pixabay | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag iconappeal proceedings,  Article 12(4) RPBA,  Board of Appeal,  EPO,  European Patent,  European Patent Office,  new version of the Rules of Procedure,  referral back,  referral limited,  referral to first instance,  revocation of a patent,  RPBA,  RPBA 2020,  Rules of Procedure,  Rules of Procedure of the EPO Board of Appeal,  substantial defects

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© MD LEGAL Patentanwalt, European Patent Attorney PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.