• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

ECJ: descriptive domain name cannot become a Union trademark

26. June 2018

The German SilverTours GmbH with its large online portal for rental cars cannot enforce that its Domain billiger-mietwagen.de is protected as a European word mark. The European Court of Justice confirmed the refusal to register the desired word mark.

mietwagenThe SilverTours GmbH case was heard against EUIPO (T-866/16). In the center of the argument is located the Domain www.billiger-mietwagen.de (German, i.e. “cheaper-rental car”), over which world-wide rented cars can be rented, very well-known in Germany. The domain holder wanted to protect this domain name as a European word mark. However, the European Patent Office (EUIPO) refused registration. In january 2018, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) confirmed that billiger-mietwagen.de cannot be protected.

The complaint of SilverTours GmbH was based on three points:

  • The EUIPO had overlooked the fact that the mark applied for by billiger-mietwagen.de was not only unusual in terms of language, but grammatically incorrect. Accordingly, the relevant public would not take any meaningfulness from the mark applied for. The language-unusual word order also refers to the company origin of the services.
  • The EUIPO had not taken into account the direct and concrete link between the word mark in question and the services it covers.
  • The word mark applied for is not one of those categories of mark for which it is difficult to establish distinctiveness. Rather, the mark belongs to the “most typical” brand category, namely that in which the type of sign already indicates its suitability as proof of origin.

But the ECJ deinied the claims

In its response, the EUIPO had taken a detailed position on the rules of German grammar in connection with the word marks in question. The three word as “the cheap rental car”, “a cheap rental car” and “cheap rental car” were considered correct in linguistic and grammatical terms.
Signs or indications moreover which may serve to designate characteristics of the goods or services applied for should be freely available to all (Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009). That provision therefore precludes those signs or indications from being reserved to a single undertaking on the basis of their registration as trade marks.

The Board of Appeal was right to hold that the sign applied for,”billiger-mietwagen.de”, is descriptive of the services concerned and that therefore its registration as a Union trade mark constitutes an absolute ground for refusal of registration under Article 7(1)(c) and opposes Regulation 207/2009.
The ECJ rejected  rejected the appeal of SilverTours GmbH and upheld the decision of the EUIPO Board of Appeal. In addition, the plaintiff had to bear the costs.

This judgement is in line with similar judgements on trademark proceedings with domain names. German Federal Patent Court also recently ruled that the domain “Headline24” is descriptive for online services (read more: Domain “Headline24” for online services not distinctive).

ECJ Judgement of 26 June 2018: france.com cannot become a Union trademark

disputed sign france.com

Today, in another prominent case, the European Court of Justice ruled on a domain name that was to be protected as a trademark: france.com cannot become a Union trademark, the ECJ ruled today.

In particular, the Court took into account the EUIPO’s considerations on the likelihood of confusion. It concluded that there is little visual similarity between the disputed signs in their general visual design.

In terms of sound, however, the court confirmed the EUIPO’s assessment, that the opposing signs are almost identical. It can be assumed that many consumers would refer to the sign France.com solely with the word “France”, said the ECJ today.

france sign of the French Republic
france sign of the French Republic

In addition, the disputed signs are also conceptually very similar, since they convey the same concept: France, the Eiffel Tower and the colours of the French flag.

The ECJ therefore considers that there is a likelihood of confusion and confirms France’s opposition to the registration of the Union trademark france.com .

 

 

Are you interested in brand or trade mark protection?

Please take your chance and contact us. Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

 

 

 

Sources:

Curia Europe: EU:T:2018:32

Curia Europe: T:2018:381

Picture:

JanClaus / pixabay.com / CC0 License

 

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Trademark Law Tag iconEUIPO,  brand mark protection,  trademark registration,  Union trademark,  domain,  internet domain,  france.com,  domainnames,  ECJ

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Suspension of infringement proceedings 1. March 2021
  • Action against a patent already expired 26. February 2021
  • Design protection in China: Amendment 2021 25. February 2021
  • EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform 18. February 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

1. March 2021
Suspension of infringement proceedings

Suspension of infringement proceedings

16. February 2021
BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest

BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest

16. February 2021
UK trademark after Brexit: earlier UK trademark in opposition

UK trademark after Brexit: earlier UK trademark in opposition

11. February 2021
EU figurative marks: Panthé figurative mark – a panther mark?

EU figurative marks: Panthé figurative mark – a panther mark?

9. February 2021
BGH ruling: Classe E versus German E-Klasse

BGH ruling: Classe E versus German E-Klasse

5. February 2021
Trade secret: what are ‘appropriate’ secrecy measures?

Trade secret: what are ‘appropriate’ secrecy measures?

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form