• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Artificial Intelligence – Not easily patentable under new EU Directive

16. November 2018

The German federal government has just decided that Germany shall become one of the world’s leading areas for artificial intelligence. Reason enough to take a look at the EU directive for AI and ML, which has just entered into force.

New EU guidance for Artificial Intelligence

The new directive “Artificial intelligence and machine learning” of the European Patent Office (EPO) assigns calculation models and algorithms to the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). In detail, the Directive mentions classification, clustering, regression and dimension reduction – such as neural networks, genetic algorithms, k-means, support vector machines, nuclear regression and discriminant analysis.

All these methods are seen as “per se abstract mathematical nature”. This is relevant because it means that the EPO rejects the patentability of these calculation models and algorithms. Significantly, the new Directive is a subchapter of the list of exclusions of patentability in mathematical methods.

AI and ML are attributed to mathematical models

Artificial intelligenceAccording to Article 52 EPC, mathematical methods are in principle excluded from patentability unless the mathematical method is of a technical nature. However, a general purpose such as the “control of a technical system” is not sufficient. A “neural network” or a “support vector machine” are also seen as abstract models without a technical character. Furthermore, the Directive clarifies that “even if a classification algorithm can be regarded as valuable for the mathematical properties”, that alone is not a technical purpose.

Rather, it must be proved that the invention produces a technical effect which serves a technical purpose. What is important, however, is that if patentability depends on a technical effect, the patent claims must be very clearly defined. All the technical features that are essential for the technical effect should be included.

In a second part, the Directive explicitly deals with the topics “simulation, design or modelling”. In the context of the computer-aided construction of a certain technical product or process, the determination of a technical parameter is a technical purpose – if this is closely related to the functioning of the technical object (T 471/05, T 625/11). Then patentability is also given.

 

Until now, the EU guidance for “computer-implemented inventions” regulated patentability around computer-based or computer-involved technologies. This affects a wide range of applications such as medical technology, measurement techniques, logistics, e-commerce, market research, optics, electromechanics and also industrial production processes. This directive does not belong to mathematical models, but is subordinated to Article 52 EPC, Patentable Inventions.

Patentability easier on basis computer-implemented invention

Examples from the “computer-implemented inventions” illustrate the successful proof of a technical character. Concrete technical applications of computer-implemented simulation methods are to be regarded as inventions within the meaning of Article 52 EPC even if they comprise mathematical formulae, the EPO Board of Appeal already decided in 2006 in the case Infineon Technologies (T 1227/05). Circuit simulations of the power of an electronic circuit with 1/f noise have the necessary technical character, because they represent an essential part of the manufacturing process for circuits, it was stated in the reasoning.

The simulation of an industrial chemical process could also be a technical process with a technical purpose. And in a computer-implemented process for designing an optical system, the use of a particular formula to determine technical parameters for given input conditions to achieve optimum optical performance makes a technical contribution.

On the other hand, if the computer-aided determination of the technical parameters depends on decisions of a human user and the technical considerations for those decisions are not specified in the claim, a technical effect of the improved construction cannot be recognised since such an effect would not be causally linked to the claim characteristics, the directive for “simulation, design or modelling” for machine learning and artificial intelligence clarifies.

In conclusion

In practice, the new guidelines for AI and ML differ significantly from the Computer-Implemented Inventions Directive – this can lead to uncertainty. Moreover the new directives still have to prove themselves before the courts. Because even in machine learning, as in metrology and electromechanics, different process steps are interwoven. Computer-controlled processes require interaction with data sets, algorithms and technical objects. However, procedural claims only arise through computer-controlled interaction with technical objects and through simulations with a demonstrable technical purpose. Thus, although there is a political declaration of intent for AI, patent protection for AI is still restrictive in Europe.

But neither China nor the USA are waiting for the EU. The American Patent Office has already signaled that AI should be patentable in general, and the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology already presented the Internet giants BAT (Baidu, Alibaba Group and Tencent Holdings) and iFlyTek as a developer group for AI in November 2017.

 

Are you looking for protection for your technique, industrial robot or AI?

We would be pleased to support you with the necessary research and correct registration of your trademark. Please take your chance and contact us.

Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

CAT-call_en

Sources:

Epo Guideline Artificial intelligence and machine learning

EPO Guideline AI – Simulation, design or modelling

Picture:

geralt / pixabay.com / CC0 License

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Patent Law Tag iconAI,  EPO,  Artificial Intelligence,  machine learning,  computer-implemented invention,  New EU guidance for Artificial Intelligence,  guidance,  ML,  Germany

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Action against a patent already expired 26. February 2021
  • Design protection in China: Amendment 2021 25. February 2021
  • EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform 18. February 2021
  • BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest 16. February 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

26. February 2021
Action against a patent already expired

Action against a patent already expired

18. February 2021
EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

15. February 2021
Employee’s invention in insolvency

Employee’s invention in insolvency

12. February 2021
Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

5. February 2021
Trade secret: what are ‘appropriate’ secrecy measures?

Trade secret: what are ‘appropriate’ secrecy measures?

29. January 2021
Brexit: Changes for UK patent attorneys in GER

Brexit: Changes for UK patent attorneys in GER

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form