• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Advertising with Olympia allowed in DE

15. March 2019

Is advertising with Olympia permissible if Olympic rings or compound words such as “Olympic” or “Olympic suspect” are used? The Federal Supreme Court ruled on the interpretation of the German Olympic Protection Act and strengthened trade with its ruling.

Olympia popular in advertising

OlympiaThe Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has ruled that the use of word creations like “olympia suspect” and “olympia ready” in business transactions for the advertising of sports textiles as such does not violate the German Olympic Protection Act. The focus was on a textile wholesaler who advertised its own website for sportswear with the attributes like “ready for the Olympic Games”.

The Deutsche Olympische Sportbund e.V. (German Olympic Sports Association) brought an action against this and saw a violation of the Olympic Protection Act (Olympia-Schutzgesetz – OlympSchG), which protects the Olympic designations against certain uses by third parties.

The German Olympic Protection Act defines in detail:

§ 1 and 3 OlympSchG:

(1) The object of this law is the protection of the Olympic emblem and the Olympic signs and words.

(3) The Olympic designations are the words “Olympiad”, “Olympia”, “Olympic” (in German: Olympiade, Olympia, olympisch), all these words alone or in combination and the corresponding words or phrases in another language.

Olympic judgement of the BGH strengthens trade

The BGH ruled, that the contested advertising does not infringe Paragraph 3 of the OlympSchG because the advertising of sportswear “ready for the Olympic Games” is not such as to avoid the likelihood of direct confusion. The BGH clarified that unfair exploitation of the appreciation of the Olympic Games does not already lie in every use which can impair the optimisation of the commercial exploitation of the Olympic designations by the holders of the intellectual property rights.
The limit to unfair exploitation is, however, exceeded if a close reference to the Olympic Games exploits their esteem for the advertising of products and their characteristics in a way to which only an official sponsor is entitled or, for example, a sports article manufacturer who is not a sponsor but whose products are used by athletes at the Olympic Games.

This is the case if products which are factually close to the Olympic Games are not only advertised with designations which are similar to the Olympic designations, but also expressly refer to the Olympic Games or the Olympic movement in words or pictures.

However, that is not the case with advertising using a term such as ‘ready for the Olympic Games’. Such Words and word combinations are used product-related as synonyms for an exceptionally good performance. However, a close link to the Olympic Games is not automatically established as a result. Rather, there is no sufficient figurative reference to the Olympic Games, which points to a lack of unfairness. Therefore, in that case, use of the Olympic designations as an indication of the characteristics or qualities of goods, services or persons is permitted.

The Olympic Protection Act is not an unconstitutional individual case law, the BGH clarified. Prohibition could only be nessessary if the reputation of the Olympic Games or the Olympic movement is transferred to another good or service through advertising – through specific circumstances.

However, the use of advertising statements like “Olympic prizes” and “Olympic discount” as such does not constitute an unfair exploitation of the appreciation of the Olympic Games or the Olympic movement.

Decision of the OLG Stuttgart on Olympic rings

The judgement of the BGH continues the case law which the OLG Stuttgart defined in February 2018 by a ruling on the guiding principles of the Olympic Protection Act ( 2 U 109/17 ).

Shortly before the opening of the Olympic Summer Games in Rio de Janeiro on 05.08.2016, the defendant German retailer LIDL published a representation of a glowing grill grate with meat and burgers. Of the five Patties of different size three were above and two below arranged, which touch at three places or overlap easily. On the photo was the slogan “Love is when we cheer for Olympia”. #summer love.” Food was advertised with this image.

Also in this LIDL advertising case the OLG court in Stuttgart permitted the use of the olympic rings and made the following lead decision:

An advertisement for grill products with an illustration, on which four hamburgers and a salmon burger (so-called “grill patties”) are arranged on a grill after kind of the Olympic rings, does not offend against § 3 exp. 1 sentence 1 OlympSchG, because not the olympic emblem itself is used, but by the advertisement only on this is alluded.
There is also no infringement of § 3 (1) sentence 2 OlympSchG, since the advertising neither creates the danger of confusion nor takes unfair advantage of the appreciation of the Olympic Games and the Olympic movement (so-called image transfer). It is limited in a permissible manner to evoking associations with the Olympic Games and thereby attracting attention.
In particular, the OLG Stuttgart ruled that the impression does not arise that LIDL belongs to the circle of official sponsors of the Olympic Games.

 

Do you help in German IP rights?

Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, copyright and product piracy, national and international law.

 

Sources:

BGH judgement “Advertising with Olympia in Germany” I ZR 225/17

Picture:

Gellinger /pixabay.com / CCO License  

 

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Product- and Trademark piracy Tag iconBGH,  Germany,  Federal Supreme Court,  Lidl,  advertising,  exploitation,  reputation,  olympic,  olympic rings,  Olympic judgement,  Olympic Games,  German Olympic Protection Act,  OlympSchG

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Action against a patent already expired 26. February 2021
  • Design protection in China: Amendment 2021 25. February 2021
  • EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform 18. February 2021
  • BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest 16. February 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

5. February 2021
Trade secret: what are ‘appropriate’ secrecy measures?

Trade secret: what are ‘appropriate’ secrecy measures?

29. January 2021
Brexit: Changes for UK patent attorneys in GER

Brexit: Changes for UK patent attorneys in GER

29. January 2021
Brexit: UK Patentanwälte ohne Vertretungsbefugnis in DE

Brexit: UK Patentanwälte ohne Vertretungsbefugnis in DE

28. January 2021
ECJ and Qualcomm: Necessity of the information requested

ECJ and Qualcomm: Necessity of the information requested

25. January 2021
Thermomix infringement by Lidl: Will Monsieur Cuisine still exist?

Thermomix infringement by Lidl: Will Monsieur Cuisine still exist?

18. December 2020
EUIPO ‘SME Fund’: grant promotes SME applications for IP rights

EUIPO ‘SME Fund’: grant promotes SME applications for IP rights

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form