• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

ECJ and Ferrari: Parts as unregistered Community design?

28. October 2021

The ECJ ruled today in a preliminary ruling in the dispute over imitation of the Ferrari design FXX K. Can the partial area of an image be claimed as an unregistered Community design? “Yes”, ruled the ECJ – but only if…

Imitation of the Ferrari design FXX K

Ferrari- nicht eingetragenes Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster?

Ferrari (Italy) has been engaged in a dispute for years over the Ferrari design of its top model, the Ferrari FXX K, which was only produced in very limited numbers and is intended exclusively for driving on race tracks. The Ferrari FXX K comes in two variants, which differ only in the colour of the “V” on the front bonnet.

Mansory Design, of which WH is the managing director, is in turn a company that offers so-called “tuning” of high-end vehicles. Both companies (Mansory Design & Holding GmbH,WH) are based in Germany. Since 2016, Mansory Design has been producing and selling so-called “tuning kits” that can be used to modify the appearance of the Ferrari 488 GTB to approximate that of the Ferrari FXX K, in both Ferrari FXX K variants.

Ferrari considers that Mansory Design infringes one or more unregistered Community designs in its favour consisting of the component part of its FXX K model by marketing these components. The components in question were those of its bodywork. Ferrari therefore brought infringement proceedings in Germany and filed annex applications. In addition, Ferrari asserted claims under unfair imitation law in respect of the components offered for sale in the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany.

Unregistered Community design – from part of the car model?

The Düsseldorf Upper District Court (Oberlandesgericht, OLG) rejected Ferrari’s action or appeal – as had the Düsseldorf Regional Court (LG Düsseldorf) – and ruled that the first and second claimed designs had never existed, as Ferrari had not proved that the minimum requirement of a certain Individual character and unity of form had been fulfilled. Only the third design claimed existed, but that had not been infringed by Mansory Design.

In the meantime, the case is before the Federal Court of Justice (BGH), which has asked the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 11 (1) and (2), first sentence, of Regulation (EC) No. 6/2002 as well as Article 4 (2) (b), Article 6 (1) of this Regulation.
The question was: Can the disclosure of an overall representation of a product give rise to an unregistered Community design in individual parts of the product?

The ECJ answered this question with a clear “yes” – provided that the appearance of that part or component is clearly recognisable and clearly visible in the representation of the disclosure. Novelty and the individual character of a Community design are the same for products and parts thereof, the ECJ clarified.

Individual character due to Art. 6 der Verordnung Nr. 6/2002

The principle for determining individual character applies: in assessing individual character, it must be possible to compare the claimed design with one or more precisely designated and individually named designs. For this purpose, it is absolutely necessary to have an image on which this claimed design can be precisely and reliably identified, the ECJ emphasised.

The term “individual character” within the meaning of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 does not govern the relationship between the design of a product and the designs of the parts of which it is composed, but the relationship between those designs and other, earlier designs. However, in order to be able to examine whether the appearance fulfils individual character within the meaning of Art. 6, a part of a product claimed in this way must be clearly delimited by lines, contours, colours, the shape or a particular surface structure, the court specified.

Consequence of this judgement

Is it now necessary, according to this judgment, to disclose separately each individual part of their products which they wish to see protected by an unregistered Community design? The ECJ reassures; this is by no means necessary to ensure the requirement of recognisability of the subject-matter. But the fact remains with this judgement that an unregistered Community design can only be claimed as part of an entire image if that part can also be precisely and clearly identified. It remains to be seen how this will be interpreted in judicial practice.

Unregistered Community Design: Low level of protection

In principle, the level of protection for an unregistered Community design is in any case lower than for registered rights, as the ECJ again clearly pointed out. This is because the holder of an unregistered Community design is only protected against imitation – and only for a period of 3 years, calculated from the date of first publication.

Do you need support for your IP right?

Our attorneys have many years of expertise in design and trade mark law as well as in the entire field of intellectual property and are authorised to represent you before any court – in Germany and also internationally.
Please feel free to contact us if you are interested.

 

Sources: 

ECJ and Ferrari Design: unregistered Community design, EU:C:2021:889

Bild:

emkanicepic | pixabay | CCO License

  • share  20 
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconDesign Law Tag iconECJ,  component,  Ferrari FXX,  Community Design,  unregistered Community design,  part of the image,  protection against imitation,  design protection,  protection unregistered design,  imitation,  unregistered EU design,  appearance,  appearance of a part of a product,  individual character,  component of a complex product,  individual character of a design,  ECJ and Ferrari design,  EU design,  unfair imitation,  BGH,  Ferrari,  Ferrari Design

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Design Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

17. February 2022
China joins the Hague Agreement

China joins the Hague Agreement

4. February 2022
Grill bowl design: patent drawings against design

Grill bowl design: patent drawings against design

31. January 2022
BGH Radiator Design: Right to be heard

BGH Radiator Design: Right to be heard

4. January 2022
Classifications 2022: IPC, Nice and Locarno

Classifications 2022: IPC, Nice and Locarno

19. November 2021
Napkin vs. table linen design: Antique spell book refutes Individual character

Napkin vs. table linen design: Antique spell book refutes Individual character

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Torhaus Westhafen
Speicherstrasse 59
D – 60327 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]