• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

CFI: 12-month priority period for EU designs

6. May 2021

The CFI has established new case law on the priority period for EU designs: instead of the previous 6 months priority period for EU designs, from now on 12 months priority period will apply to EU designs – if the priority is based on an international PCT patent application.

Priority period for EU designsUp to now, a shorter priority period was provided for designs than for patents and utility models because they are more complex (Art. 4 Section C Para. 1 of the Paris Convention for Patents and Utility Models). Above all, however, the registration procedure for patents or utility models also takes considerably longer than for designs or trade marks.

Facts of the case

In the case KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR, which was heard by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) at the end of April, plaintiff KaiKai Company challenged this shorter priority period for EU designs (Community designs). The applicant had followed up the first application for a patent with an application for a design, namely a multiple application for registration of twelve Community designs with priority claim through an international PCT patent application.

The EUIPO rejected this priority right because the filing date of the previous application was more than six months before the filing date of the multiple application. Although a PCT application in principle gives rise to a right of priority under Article 41 of Regulation No. 6/2002, since the broad definition of the term “patent” in Article 2 PCT also includes utility models, the usual six-month priority period for designs applies to this application for an EU design.

Priority from a PCT application for EU designs

This decision was challenged by the applicant and brought before the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The court thus had to clarify whether EU designs can claim priority from a PCT application – and whether they are subject to the short priority period for designs or the longer one for patents and utility models.

The first aspect, namely that EU designs can claim priority from a PCT application, had already been established by the EUIPO. Rightly so, the CFI confirmed. The PCT does not distinguish on the basis of the different rights with which the various states mentioned grant protection to the invention, the CFI stated, which is why utility models and patents are also granted equivalent protection, although the utility model is also a less examined property right.

Moreover, the court explained, Art. 41(1) of Regulation No. 6/2002 says nothing about the priority period from an international patent application. Therefore, the interpretation had to take into account the rule underlying the priority right, namely Article 4 of the Paris Convention.

However, according to the CFI, Article 4 is to a certain extent a special provision. For according to Article 4(E)(1), the priority period established for the later right is decisive if that later right is a design and the earlier right is a utility model.

But does that apply in the present constellation, that the duration of the priority period depends on the nature of the later right?

12-month priority period for EU designs

The ECJ answered this question in the negative. Rather, the earlier right must be decisive for the priority right, not the later right, the court ruled. This is because the priority period begins to run on the date of this application, ergo the creation of the priority right itself as well as the beginning of the priority period depends on the earlier right and its application. It was therefore logical, the ECJ ruled, that the duration of the priority right also depended on the earlier right.

Incidentally, this also corresponds to the main justification for the longer priority period for patents, where the duration of the preliminary examination is argued. This also confirms that only the earlier right is decisive for the duration of the priority period, the court added.

The court therefore concluded that the EUIPO was wrong to consider that the time limit for claiming priority of the international patent application for the Community design application was six months. The ECJ overturned the EUIPO’s decision – and at the same time adopts new case law on the priority period for EU designs.

Do you want to protect or defend your product as a design?

Our lawyers will be happy to advise you. Please feel free to contact us if you are interested.

Sources: 

Judgement of CFI, EU:T:2021:186

Image:

japanibackpacker | pixabay | CCO License

  • share  9 
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconDesign Law Tag iconEU designs,  Designs,  priority period,  priority period for EU designs,  longer priority period for EU designs,  CFI,  12 months priority period,  judgement,  KaiKai,  Community designs,  priority

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Design Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

17. February 2022
China joins the Hague Agreement

China joins the Hague Agreement

4. February 2022
Grill bowl design: patent drawings against design

Grill bowl design: patent drawings against design

31. January 2022
BGH Radiator Design: Right to be heard

BGH Radiator Design: Right to be heard

4. January 2022
Classifications 2022: IPC, Nice and Locarno

Classifications 2022: IPC, Nice and Locarno

19. November 2021
Napkin vs. table linen design: Antique spell book refutes Individual character

Napkin vs. table linen design: Antique spell book refutes Individual character

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Torhaus Westhafen
Speicherstrasse 59
D – 60327 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]