• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

3D Printing – Patent Infringement?

24. May 2018

3D printing is a topic of the future in many areas. As more and more materials can be processed, the possibilities of so-called additive manufactoring are growing in many industries. Central areas of industry, the construction industry, logistics and medical technology – they can all benefit from the new opportunities. At the same time, however, patent infringements in the context of 3D printing quickly occur.

Patent infringement by 3D printing?

3d printerA patent infringement by 3D printing falls under § 9.2 No. 1 Patent Law. Because the reproduction of a patented object by means of 3D printing is a production of this product in the sense of § 3.9  No. 1 Patent Act and thus a direct use of this patent, unless the end product differs from the original product to a relevant extent. Third parties who manufacture such an object as a product or put such a product on the market are infringing patents. This does not apply to production in a private environment for non-commercial purposes.

For example, can any number of wearing parts be produced if this is used in the private environment and for the production of samples?

Exceptions for non-commercial purposes

Legally this is defined in such a way that it may not only be produced in a private environment but also only for personal use. However, if the product is handed over to another person after a certain period of time, the determination of non-commercial use is no longer clear. The purpose of § 9 Patent Law, however, is to secure for the patent proprietor all economic advantages which may result from the use of the patented invention. It should also be granted effective legal protection. It is therefore important to know whether a 3D print of a patented object will actually arouse a demand for this product that is promised to be satisfied with the print.

Patent infringement by exhibiting at trade fairs

In this context, it is also important to exhibit products at trade fairs. With their presentations, the exhibitors naturally try to establish business relations with interested trade fair visitors and arouse interest in their products. This means offering in accordance with § 9 PatG (OLG Düsseldorf, I-15 U 19/14 – sterile containers) – even if the exhibitor’s registered office is abroad, for example.

Indirect patent infringement through a CAD file possible

In addition, indirect patent infringements may also occur. This belongs to § 10 Patent Law. Accordingly, a patent proprietor may also prohibit such means which themselves are not patent infringing but which are suitable and intended for the use of the invention. Such a tool can be, for example, a device or a component, descriptions or design plans, but in the context of 3D printing, a CAD file can also count as a tool.

Even the distribution of a CAD file can constitute an indirect violation. Uploading a CAD file is already an offer for delivery to see, anyway one leaves the private area with it. Simultaneous forwarding to one or more recipients is valuated as a delivery. However, downloading a CAD file from the Internet, for example from an online platform, however, is a preparatory measure for the reproduction of the product and as such not yet a patent infringement. There is also a lack of specific case law on the liability of online platform providers for CAD files – relevant here are Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of intellectual property rights and Directive 2000/31/EC on legal aspects of information society services in the internal market, in particular electronic services (e-commerce Directive).

In any case, the rapid growth of 3D printing is breaking down the barrier between the digital and substantive worlds, which for a long time also protected patents. And this especially in the increasing digitalization of the last 10 to 15 years, which has already led to mass infringements in copyright law for years.

Conclusion

When filing a patent application, it is important to include design forms and processes in corresponding patent claims and to defend them in the grant procedure. Such means cannot easily be challenged in any infringement proceedings on the grounds that they constitute an indirect patent infringement.

Do you want help for patent application or protection for your patents?

Our Patent Attorneys and Attorneys at Law bundle are experts in patent- and trademark law, national and international.
Please take your chance and contact us – a request for a call-back is non-binding:

CAT-call_en

Sources:

§9 PatG

§10 PatG

Picture:

Ippicture /pixabay.com / CCO License  

 

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconDesign Law,  News from our law firm,  Patent Law Tag icon3D Printing,  additive manufactoring,  CAD file,  patent protection,  Trade Fairs

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Design Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

17. February 2022
China joins the Hague Agreement

China joins the Hague Agreement

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

4. February 2022
Grill bowl design: patent drawings against design

Grill bowl design: patent drawings against design

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.