• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

$2 billion damage: Tesla is sued for patent infringement in planned E-Truck

14. May 2018

The US company Nikola has sued Tesla in a US court. Nikola claims $2 billion in damages for infringement of its own patents in the design of an electric truck. Tesla had infringed patent rights in the development of the planned Semi Nicolas electric truck.

Nikola One versus Tesla Electric Truck Semi

On December 30, 2015 Nikola filed a design patent to protect the design of the so-called Nikola One. The Nikola One is an electric-hydrogen hybrid. The patents granted concerned the fuselage (U.S. Pat. D811,944), the windscreen (U.S. Pat. D811,968) and the side door (U.S. Pat. D816,004). And indeed, the Tesla design resembles Nikolas Electric Truck especially in these elements.

The American design patent protects the appearance of an object, not its function. The design patent is also examined for novelty by the American Patent and Trademark Office and a priority period of 6 months is very important for German applicants for a design. A design patent should therefore be filed within 6 months of filing the German “Geschmacksmuster”.

The petition before the Arizona District Court (2:18-cv-01344) provides details of the possible patent infringement:

  • May 2016: Nikola publishes a photo for the design of the planned fuel cell truck Nikola One.
  • July 2016: Tesla boss Elon Musk announces to design an electric truck.
  • Dec 2016: Nikola introduces the Nikola One truck, expected to be ready for the market in 2021
  • Nov 2017: Tesla introduces the Semi electric truck, expected to be ready for the market in 2020.

In fact, Tesla’s Semi electric truck is so similar to the Nikola One that independent experts from the automotive industry noticed this as early as 2017. Not only the striking elements such as the curved windscreen or the special side door are very similar, but also the air resistance. Due to its striking aerodynamic shape, which has not yet been used in the automotive industry in this way, the cw could fall to 0.37, claims Nikola, and Tesla holds out the prospect of a cw of 0.36.

ABPA vs. Ford – Judgement in another design patent dispute

Only in February 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan also ruled on truck design law in another case. In the Automotive Body Parts Association (“ABPA”) case against Ford Global Technologies, LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-10137 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 20, 2018), the plaintiff ABPA sought a declaration of invalidity for two patents of Ford. The court rejected this. The design patents for body parts of Ford’s F-150 truck have been confirmed. ABPA had argued, among other things, that patents could not be enforced due to patent exhaustion if “the mere purchase of an F-150 does not give the owner the right to manufacture new body parts protected by Ford’s patents.

In that case, the Court reiterated that the purpose of trade mark law was to promote competition. Design law, on the other hand, has the task of enabling patent holders to exclude others from imitating the protected design.

Against this background, the outcome of the lawsuit against Tesla’s electric truck Semi is completely open. One can be all the more curious about the verdict, as Nikola wants to invest heavily in the logistics behind the hybrid drive for the Nikola One next year.

Are you looking for legal help for design patent protection?

Please take your chance and contact us. You can request a non-binding call-back at:

 

 

 

Sources:

Claim Nikola vs. Tesla

Picture:

rauschenberger /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconDesign Law,  International Intellectual Property,  Patent Law Tag icondesign protection,  design protection automotive,  patent protection,  Tesla,  Truck,  E mobility,  Nikola One,  ABPA,  Nikola

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Design Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor? 2. March 2021
  • Suspension of infringement proceedings 1. March 2021
  • Action against a patent already expired 26. February 2021
  • Design protection in China: Amendment 2021 25. February 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

2. March 2021
BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor?

BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor?

26. February 2021
Action against a patent already expired

Action against a patent already expired

25. February 2021
Design protection in China: Amendment 2021

Design protection in China: Amendment 2021

18. February 2021
EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

15. February 2021
Employee’s invention in insolvency

Employee’s invention in insolvency

12. February 2021
Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form