• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Eva Maria Amoah
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Trademark protection for EU word mark Oktoberfest – partial

8. October 2020

So far, the desired trademark registration of the EU word mark Oktoberfest had been refused. Trademark applicant City of Munich has now been successful: EUIPO confirms trademark protection for EU word mark Oktoberfest – partially.

word mark OktoberfestAlthough the Munich Oktoberfest has to be cancelled this year due to Corona restrictions, there are news about the Munich Oktoberfest. The city of Munich has been trying for years to obtain trademark protection for the term “Oktoberfest” both in Germany and Europe, but so far in vain (please also read our article from 2019: Trademark registration of Oktoberfest rejected again).

In June 2016, the Oktoberfest was registered as a European Union trademark at the Office of the European Union for Intellectual Property (EUIPO) “Oktoberfest”, as a word mark.

Above all, a research and visitor statistics were used to demonstrate the outstanding reputation of the brand name “Oktoberfest”, as this enabled the City of Munich to invoke the need for protection by Article 7(3) in German UMV.

Registration of the word mark Oktoberfest refused at first instance

Nevertheless, EUIPO initially refused to register the trade mark for a large part of the desired goods and services: all goods and services in Classes 3, 4, 6, 9, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 39, 41, 43 and parts of 45 (trade mark protection was expressly granted for licensing, management of copyright in sound and images (both analogue and digital) and registration of domain names; all this is also found in Nice Class 45).

One of the shortcomings was that only visitors to public festivals were included, but not the entire population. However, this is necessary for the proof of acquired distinctiveness through use. In addition, “Okoberfest beer” was registered as a trade mark, also by proving that it had been put into circulation (the proprietor of the trade mark is the Verein Münchener Brauereien e. V.). It was therefore contradictory to seek to put a very similar sign into circulation for identical goods. Therefore, the acquisition of acquired distinctiveness (Article 7(3) in German UMV) was rejected and the trade mark application was refused on the ground of lack of distinctiveness.

Protection of word mark Oktoberfest confirmed in large part

The City of Munich appealed against this decision in a complaint procedure (R 1840/2019-4) and was granted justice. The EUIPO Board of Appeal reversed the refusal to register the trade mark in large part (Oktoberfest, 015535008), in fact, for classes 3, 4, 6, 9, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28, 31, 34, 35, 38, 39, 45 and parts of 43 (hotels and guesthouses; room reservation and rental). In other words, no trade mark protection was granted for the term Oktoberfest in classes 29, 30, 32, 33, 41 and parts of 43.

The Board of Appeal emphasised that it did not share concerns about the surveys. It is true that there are folk festivals in Germany and also in other countries, i.e. Austria, which are called “Oktoberfest”, including the “Oktoberfest Wien”. However, there is no evidence that consumers assume that the city of Munich is also responsible for organising these festivals, as was the case with the Munich Oktoberfest. It is a fact that anyone who attends the Oktoberfest in Munich is not obliged to ask whether he would also attend an Oktoberfest in Vienna.

The contested decision was therefore annulled in large part. The Board of Appeal stressed that it was differentiating in it`s decision. The Board of Appeal stated that the City of Munich should not allow organisers of other Oktoberfest events to use the power of the Union word mark Oktoberfest to demand licence fees. However, the City of Munich could very well ensure the attractiveness of the name for souvenir articles and merchandising. The Board of Appeal added that the designation “Münchener Oktoberfest”, for example, was also open to unprotected use.

The City of Munich was happy to use this reference and yesterday (7 October 2020) filed two applications for new Union word marks: „Münchener Oktoberfest“  and „Oktoberfest München“.

Would you also like to protect your trademark or brand?

Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

 

Sources: 

EUTM file 015535008

Image:

Alexas_Photos | pixabay.com | CCO License

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconwordmark,  Oktoberfest,  word mark Oktoberfest,  trademark protection Oktoberfest,  trademark Oktoberfest,  Oktoberfest 2020,  wordmark Oktoberfest

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Chianti vs GHISU: advantage taken unfairly of the earlier mark 15. April 2021
  • ECJ on legitimate interest: Appeal against amendment of specifications 15. April 2021
  • Case law product similarity: consumer attention 13. April 2021
  • OLG Düsseldorf: No compensation for damages of gratuitous licensing 9. April 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

15. April 2021
Chianti vs GHISU: advantage taken unfairly of the earlier mark

Chianti vs GHISU: advantage taken unfairly of the earlier mark

15. April 2021
ECJ on legitimate interest: Appeal against amendment of specifications

ECJ on legitimate interest: Appeal against amendment of specifications

13. April 2021
Case law product similarity: consumer attention

Case law product similarity: consumer attention

9. April 2021
OLG Düsseldorf: No compensation for damages of gratuitous licensing

OLG Düsseldorf: No compensation for damages of gratuitous licensing

9. April 2021
Alkemie vs. Alkmene: word/figurative mark vs. earlier word mark

Alkemie vs. Alkmene: word/figurative mark vs. earlier word mark

26. March 2021
Colour mark: systematic arrangement of colours decisive

Colour mark: systematic arrangement of colours decisive

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form