• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees' Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Angelika Hempel
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

PINK LADY wins: Older brand victorious

16. October 2018

The earlier trademark PINK LADY wins the fruit trademark dispute. In its judgment yesterday, the European Court annulled the previous EUIPO decision granting the EU wordmark WILD PINK for goods such as fruit and fruit essences.

Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier trade mark

Pink LadyThe proprietor of an earlier trade mark may file an opposition against the registration of an EU trade mark. Apple and Pear Australia Limited and Star Fruits Diffusion had filed an opposition against registration of the mark applied for “WILD PINK” for all the goods referred to in the application for registration, but had failed with the opposition both before the Opposition Division and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

The Board of Appeal argued that the word element “pink” could be perceived by the relevant public as descriptive of the colour of the goods concerned – fruit and fruit essences. The Board of Appeal also found that the marks at issue were conceptually, visually and phonetically inconsistent. In particular, because pink is first in one mark and second in the other, the Board of Appeal found that there were clear differences between the marks.

Meaning of the word element Pink

Accordingly, the European Court (CJEU) considered in detail the meaning and dominance of the word element pink in the two disputed marks. It is by no means a known fact that apples are not pink, the Court found. The plaintiffs Apple and Pear Australia Limited and Star Fruits Diffusion had submitted this as an argument. However, as the EUIPO had correctly stated, the broad specification “fruits” included apples and other fruits which may be pink, such as raspberries, strawberries, cherries and pomegranates. It follows that the word “Pink” must be regarded as descriptive of such goods.

Dominance of element Pink

The dominance of the word pink, however, was judged differently by the CJEU than by the EUIPO. In the present case, although the word “Pink” plays a secondary role to the word “Lady”, the accompanying words “Lady” and “Wild” in the respective marks cannot be regarded as capable of dominating those marks alone. In the light of all the foregoing considerations, it must said that the word element “Pink” does not play a negligible role in the disputed marks and cannot therefore be disregarded. A descriptive element of a mark is not necessarily negligible in the overall impression produced by it.

It follows that the Board of Appeal was wrong to hold that the signs at issue were visually, phonetically and conceptually dissimilar. The CJEU therefore annulled the decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 January 2017 (Case R 87/2015-4) and acknowledged the opposition of the proprietor of the earlier mark.

 

Would you also like to protect your brand or trademark?

Then please do not hesitate to contact us. Our patent attorneys and attorneys at law are experienced and highly qualified in all areas of intellectual property law, both nationally and internationally.

Request your call-back without any obligations!

CAT-call_en

 

Sources:

Curia Europe: EU:T:2018:678 PINK LADY

Picture:

pixel2013 /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share  
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 
Ajax Loader
100% 0%

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconwordmark,  EUIPO,  older brand,  Dominance,  Pink Lady,  wild pink

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • Trademark infringement in China: new trademark law in force 6. December 2019
  • Indien-Japan PPH Treaty: PPH and PCT is trendy 6. December 2019
  • German Balsamico confirmed by ECJ 5. December 2019
  • Checkered design: Registration decisive, not the use of a trademark 3. December 2019

Newsletter Subscription

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

6. December 2019
Trademark infringement in China: new trademark law in force

Trademark infringement in China: new trademark law in force

5. December 2019
German Balsamico confirmed by ECJ

German Balsamico confirmed by ECJ

3. December 2019
Checkered design: Registration decisive, not the use of a trademark

Checkered design: Registration decisive, not the use of a trademark

28. November 2019
Advocate General: Amazon Marketplace co-responsible for TM infringement

Advocate General: Amazon Marketplace co-responsible for TM infringement

25. November 2019
Medical devices in trademark law different to patent law

Medical devices in trademark law different to patent law

18. November 2019
Malle and Ballermann as warning letters

Malle and Ballermann as warning letters

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Subscription

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf anfordern

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutz-Erklärung.
Das System verwendet Cookies, die uns eine Nutzeranalyse unserer Website ermöglichen.
Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Request a call back

To be able to use this offer, you have to consent to the storage of your personal data. We will treat your personal data as strictly confidential and will only use them to improve our company’s marketing. Read more in our privacy policy. With consenting to the storage of your personal data, you also consent that we use your email address to send further information to you which might be of interest for you.
The system is using cookies to enable analysis of this website’s users and their interests.