• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Impossible Burger stays: EUIPO decided against Nestlé

16. November 2021

Since May 2020 Nestlé was forced to rename its ‘Incredible Burger’ in Holland, the court in The Hague saw a likelihood of confusion with ‘Impossible Burger’. Nestlé then filed an application for invalidity against ‘Impossible Burger’ – but now in May the EUIPO rejected this with interesting considerations on suggestive trademark features.

Veggie Burger- impossible oder incredibleIn competetion for vegan burgers and good brand names for the burgers, Nestlé is engaged in a prolonged trademark dispute with competitor Impossible Foods Inc. (USA), which was perceived as a serious competitor in the competitive growing veggie burger market by Nestlé and Beyond Meat at the latest when Google wanted to buy it.

Trademark dispute over veggie burgers: Impossible versus Incredible

Impossible Foods Inc. burgers are known by the brand name of the same name, namely Impossible Burger. Nestlé became particularly aware of this when the Swiss company was forced to rename its own “Incredible Burger” in the Netherlands last year. Because the court in The Hague saw a risk of confusion for burgers between Incredible and Impossible.

Nestlé had to follow suit and renamed the Incredible Burger ‘Sensational Burger’ – but at the same time filed an application for a declaration of invalidity with the European Trademark Office (EUIPO) for the EU trademark Impossible Burger. Nestlé argued that the word ‘impossible’ in the mark was part of a motivational expression. Impossible Foods’ Impossible Burger mark was a descriptive indication and also a purely advertising message and should therefore be declared invalid.

Invalidity application against Impossible Burger

The EUIPO ruled on this application in May 2021 (Cancellation No C 33 961 (Invalidity)) – against Nestlé. Impossible Foods was on thin ice, the EUIPO explained, by mixing its trademarks with advertising claims such as “plants that make the impossible possible”. But still, consumers would not perceive the Impossible Burger brand as a burger that was thought to be impossible to make.

Rather, consumers would see Impossible Fooods’ texts and videos as somewhat amusing word games – the interpretation of which would also require several mental steps. Precisely then, however, an advertising statement or a slogan can also be a protected trade mark. In any case, according to the EUIPO, the mark does not describe any particular characteristics of a vegetarian burger from Impossible Foods, nor does it describe a superior quality. In common parlance, impossible (= “impossible”) has no positive connotation.

In addition, the EUIPO referred to the Cine Action decision, according to which Article 7(1)(c) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation (CTMR), with regard to the absolute grounds for refusal, does not apply to terms which are only allusive or suggestive of certain characteristics of the goods, i.e. suggestive trade mark features.

Nestlé’s application for a declaration of invalidity was therefore dismissed in its entirety. However, Nestlé may pursue this case further and bring an action before the European Court. This is also likely to happen, as the very lucrative veggie burger market is at stake – and because trademarks that are also advertising messages are always decided on a case-by-case basis.

Would you also like to protect or defend a trade mark?

Our lawyers have many years of expertise in trade mark law as well as in the entire field of intellectual property and are entitled to represent you before any court – in Germany and also internationally.


 

Sources: 

Decision of EUIPO

Bild:

JRMartins | pixabay | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconDen Haag,  EUIPO,  Impossible Burger,  Impossible Foods,  Incredible Burger,  Nestle,  Sensationell Burger,  Veggie Burger

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.