• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

ECJ affirms retroactive trademark infringement in the five-year period

26. March 2020

In today’s judgment of the ECJ, the ECJ ruled that a trademark owner can claim retroactive trademark infringement with a claim for damages even for an unused trademark within the five-year period – and even after the trademark had expired.

retroactive trademark infringementRetroactive trademark infringement on already expired trademark

The trade mark proprietor had claimed that there had been an infringement of his trade mark during the five-year period. He filed an infringement action – but only after his allegedly infringed trademark had been revoked and declared invalid because it had not been put to genuine use.

The French court (Cour de cassation) therefore referred the case Cooper International Spirits LLC to the ECJ. This is because genuine use of a trademark is a condition for trademark protection. Therefore, if a trademark is not used for five years, it will be revoked under Article 12(1) of Directive EC 2008/95.

ECJ affirms retroactive trademark infringement in the five-year period

In today’s judgment, the highest European Court of Justice (ECJ) followed the opinion of the Advocate General of September 2019 and answered the question referred by the ECJ as already answered by the Advocate General that Articles 5(1)(b), 10 and 12 of Directive 2008/95/EC are to be interpreted as meaning that an action for infringement of a trade mark is also admissible retroactively and thus after revocation of the trade mark during the five-year period and that the EU Member States may decide so. The Member States may also decide on claims for damages based on this trademark infringement.

Five-year period is grace period for the trademark with full rights

The Court stressed that Articles 15(1) and 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 grant a period of grace for the commencement of genuine use of that mark. That period is necessary precisely in order to enable the proprietor of a trade mark to exercise his exclusive rights under that mark (under Article 9(1)) in respect of all the goods and services for which it is registered, without having to prove genuine use.

Moreover, from the moment of expiry of the five-year period, following a counterclaim or an action brought by the third party in infringement proceedings against that exclusive right, it can be established whether genuine use of that mark has not yet begun.

It is up to the respective EU Member States whether they wish to provide that in cases where a counterclaim for revocation is filed, a trademark cannot be validly invoked in infringement proceedings if that trademark could be revoked, the ECJ stated. This corresponds to the sixth recital of the EU Directive 2008/95.

The Court also referred to the December 2016 judgment, Länsförsäkringar (C-654/15, EU:C:2016:998), which also addressed the issue of the scope of the exclusive right at the end of the grace period, while the trademark has already been revoked. However, the present Cooper case is not comparable with this, the ECJ stated, and referred to a different starting point. In the Cooper case, the French legislature did not make use of the possibility provided for in Article 11(3) of Directive 2008/95 at the material time in the main proceedings.

Claim for damages in the event of retroactive infringement of a trade mark during the five-year period

The ECJ explicitly stated that it is for the Member States to decide on claims for damages for trademark infringement within the five-year period for a trademark which has expired thereafter. In this context, the Court pointed out that the lack of use of a trademark is an important aspect with regard to the amount and scope of a claim for damages, which Member States should take into account.

Would you also like to protect your trademark or brand?

Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

 

Sources: 

Judgement of ECJ “Cooper”, EU:C:2020:241

Image:

StockSnap | pixabay.com | CCO License | OpenClipart-Vectors | pixabay.com | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconclaim for damages,  damages,  ECJ,  five-year period,  retroactive trademark infringement,  trademark expired,  trademark infringement within the five-year period,  unused trademark

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© MD LEGAL Patentanwalt, European Patent Attorney PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.