• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Amazon not responsible for unfair advertising in Amazon affiliates

8. September 2020

If customers are guided to amazon.de via the affiliate link and make a purchase, the website operator (= affiliate) receives a so-called advertising cost reimbursement. Amazon and its companies are nevertheless not responsible and are not to be regarded as clients for unfair advertising in Amazon affiliates, the Mannheim Higher Regional Court ruled.

Amazon-Affiliate LinkIn the recently decided case before the OLG Mannheim a mattress manufacturer resident in Germany complained. She defended herself against the sale of a mattress “S” by a company called “S”, which acts as a dealer on the so-called Amazon Market Place.

Unfair competition in Amazon affiliates?

On the website www.xyz.net/matratze-test/ can be found under the headings: Imprint, privacy policy, the following text: “The editorial staff of xyz.de works independently of manufacturers. We link to selected online stores and partners from which we may receive remuneration”.

The plaintiff claimed that the advertising on the website www.xyz.de is misleading in the sense of § 5 para.1 No.1 UWG. Objective mattress recommendations and product comparisons were promised. Actually the entire enterprise of the web page xyz.de is however driven by financial interests. Because the side operator earns substantial commissions over the Affiliate left switched by it to the offers under Amazon.de. In addition, there is also a violation of § 5a para. 2 UWG. Because the side operator does not clear up about the fact that he acts presently as Affiliate partner of the defendant, in particular also not in the Affiliate links.

Application for interim injunction rejected by court

Therefore the plaintiff asserted claims for injunction against companies of the Amazon group through a temporary injunction due to unfair advertising by a third party on its website www.xyz.de.

But the OLG Mannheim rejected the request for preliminary injunction, just like already the regional court Mannheim. Because in the opinion of the court, the plaintiff’s claim for injunction against the defendants was missing. None of the defendants can be attributed the anti-competitive content (if it is anti-competitive) of the website of an affiliate partner as an entrepreneur according to § 8 para. 2 UWG, the Mannheim Higher Regional Court ruled.

Although the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) affirmed the responsibility of the operator of such an advertising partnership for the trademark infringement committed by the advertising partner as an agent pursuant to Section 14 (7) of the Trademark Act (judgement of October 7, 2009 GRUR 2009, 1167 – Affiliate Program), the OLG also referred to this. However, in contrast to the “Partner Program” case to be judged by the Federal Court of Justice, it was not apparent that the defendant side would admit the applicant after having checked the website and would grant him access to an internal partner area under certain conditions, where services would then be made available to him, such as access to the entrepreneur’s database. But only on the basis of the facts of the case there, the Federal Supreme Court had assumed that the defendant there secured a decisive influence on its advertising partners. However, this was not the case in the present case, decided the OLG Mannheim.

Amazon affiliates who refer to Amazon offers in their advertising on their homepage with the link “Buy at Amazon” within the framework of the Amazon partner program and who receive an advertising cost reimbursement from an Amazon company in the event of a sale made via the link, act independently, solely on their own responsibility, for themselves and not as an agent of Amazon companies, according to the formulation of this agreement and in an evaluative view, formulated the OLG as a guiding principle decision. Unfair advertising on the homepage of the Affiliates is not to be attributed to the Amazon societies therefore as clients after § 8 exp. 2 UWG.

 

Would you also like to protect yourself against unfair competition?

Our lawyers will be pleased to advise you. Please contact us if you are interested – we look forward to your call!


 

Sources: 

Judgement of OLG Mannheim, 6 U 127/19

Image:

geralt | pixabay.com | CCO License

  • share  21 
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconProduct- and Trademark piracy Tag iconinterim injunction,  unfair competition,  advertising,  link to Amazon,  BGH partner program,  § 5 Abs.1 Nr.1 UWG,  Amazon-Affiliates

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Product- and Trademark piracy

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Own trademark application fails – despite comparable trademarks: Equal treatment? 5. March 2021
  • Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment 5. March 2021
  • BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor? 2. March 2021
  • Suspension of infringement proceedings 1. March 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

5. March 2021
Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment

Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment

25. January 2021
Thermomix infringement by Lidl: Will Monsieur Cuisine still exist?

Thermomix infringement by Lidl: Will Monsieur Cuisine still exist?

11. December 2020
Illegal videos on Youtube – no disclosure of the e-mail

Illegal videos on Youtube – no disclosure of the e-mail

3. December 2020
Käpt’n Iglo: maritime advertising in court

Käpt’n Iglo: maritime advertising in court

10. November 2020
German UWG: Updating Law is coming!

German UWG: Updating Law is coming!

2. November 2020
3 D Printing is trend – but infringement of IP rights? Part #1 of 2

3 D Printing is trend – but infringement of IP rights? Part #1 of 2

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form