• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

U. S. Patent for Wi-Fi: Curious patent infringement lawsuits – by patent valid up to 44 years

2. March 2020

Curious patent infringement lawsuits by a U.S. patent exploiter are currently drawing attention through more than a dozen simultaneous lawsuits before two U.S. district courts. All of these lawsuits are based on an older U.S. patent for Wi-Fi technology, which will expire after 44 years – but such a thing is actually impossible.

Patentverletzung Wi-Fi - 44 Jahre LaufzeitPatent infringement Wi-Fi – 44 years durationThe patent protection expires after 20 years at the latest according to U.S. patent law, German patent law and international patent law. Only for pharmaceuticals there is the possibility to extend patent protection for up to 5 more years by the so-called SPC.

Patent infringement suits of Castlemorton Wireless, LLC

More than a dozen simultaneous lawsuits in the U.S. District Courts of Delaware and Western Texas were filed a few days ago by Castlemorton Wireless, LLC. The defendants are electronics manufacturers such as Pioneer and Plantronics, as well as telecommunications companies such as T-Mobile, Verizon and Comcast. All claims allege infringement of their own prior U.S. Patent 7,835,421, which was filed in 1983 as an invention of the U.K. Department of Defense and describes a technology in the Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS).

Patent on DSSS technology fell under U.S. secrecy order

The fact that such a lawsuit is possible is connected with the American secrecy order. For reasons of national security, this order makes it possible to withhold a patent application for an indefinite period of time.

Since DSSS technology was originally created during the Second World War to solve problems of enemy radio interference, the U.S. government issued a secrecy order on the ‘421 patent in 1983 directly upon filing of the patent application. This order was lifted in 2010 and the ‘421 patent, which had been kept secret until then, was considered granted. Since the application was filed before June 8, 1995 (the date of entry into force of the TRIPS Agreement, Article 33), the term of this patent is either 20 years from the earliest date of application or 17 years from the date of grant, whichever is longer. The legal term of the ‘421 patent will therefore expire on 16 November 2027 after 44 years, regardless of the filing date of the patent of 4 January 1983.

The UK government department that invented this patent has since been semi-privatised as QinetiQ and has entered into a partnership with patent enforcer Castlemorton – also known as the Patent Troll – to enforce its patent profitably.

Lawsuits are generally directed against wireless communication

Castlemorton’s allegations of patent infringement are directed against a variety of today’s Wi-Fi enabled products, including network management systems, access points, routers, wireless modules, and also IP phones, video phones and AV receivers. In 1999, the IEEE standardized the first widespread form of wireless computer networking, the mother of Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi 802.11b. And plaintiff Castlemorton claims infringement of its own patent by any product and/or service that supports detection of a carrier frequency in a DSSS signal by its implementation of the IEEE 802.11b and/or IEEE 802.11g standards.

Of course Wi-Fi has evolved, but the standards claimed by the ‘421 patent are still relevant today. Meanwhile, the standards IEEE 802.11, IEEE 802.11bn or IEEE 802.11gn are often used for the configuration of the access point – but this is a combination of the older IEEE 802.11a or IEEE 802.11b or IEEE 802.11g with the newer IEEE 802.11n standard. Modern wireless networks are still backwards compatible and are under real threat from patent infringement lawsuits.

Curious patent infringement lawsuits raise questions

The two U.S. District Courts in Delaware and Western Texas therefore have difficult questions to answer in these strange patent infringement lawsuits.

In fact, the ‘421 patent is considered prior art according to Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as available from the patent application of January 4, 1983, despite the fact that it was withheld and unknown to the world until 2010. Normally, however, no patent is granted on a known prior art, but this may of course have occurred with unmanageable frequency in the period from 1883 to 2010. At the same time, ignorance does not protect against patent infringement. Every patent applicant is required to make full enquiries as to the state of the art, and this includes worldwide publications and patent applications. How this is to be assessed for a patent application that has been kept secret for decades is left to the U.S. District Courts.

It is equally exciting to wait and see how the comparison of technologies will be judged. The ‘421 patent does not refer to Wi-Fi at any point, but exclusively to DSSS.

Are you seeking protection for your international or national patent rights?

Our attorneys have many years of expertise in patent law as well as in the entire field of intellectual property and are entitled to represent you before any court – in Germany and internationally.
Please contact us if you are interested.


 

Sources: 

Portal Patent litigations

Image:

Issuc | pixabay | CCO License

 

  • share  35 
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag iconWi-Fi 802.11b,  DSSS-Signal,  U.S. Classified,  U. S. District Court of Delaware,  carrier frequency in a DSSS signal,  Patent Application,  Wi-Fi,  Castlemorton,  Castlemorton Wireless,  LLC

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Torhaus Westhafen
Speicherstrasse 59
D – 60327 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]