• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Transfer of a patent – with opposition

16. August 2019

The transfer of a patent can take place at any time, but is particularly important in the event of a change of proprietor or a change of name. In the event of an opposition against the transfer, a final judgment by default may replace the declaration of intent of the transfer by the previous patentee.

Transfer of a patent

transfer of a patentPursuant to § 30 (3), German Patent Law, the German Patent Office notes in the patent register a change in the person of the applicant or patent proprietor if it is proved to him. Proof must be furnished by the production of documents relating to the requested change of law.
For this purpose, if the application is filed by the legal successors, a declaration signed by the registered patent holders that they agree to the registration of the legal successor must be attached to the application.

Opposition to the transfer of a patent: case-law

In a case recently decided before the Federal Patent Court (BPatG, 7 W (pat) 4/18), such a declaration of intent on the request for a patent transfer had been made as an agreement with the heading “patent assignment”. The patentee and defendant opposed the request for transfer. According to the patent assignment filed, the right had been transferred from the patent, but no consent had been given to the transfer in the register, the patentee argued.

The German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA) upheld the opposition and rejected the request for transfer in May 2017. Since no signed transfer declaration had been submitted to the Patent Office by all parties or no agreement had been reached and the registered patent proprietor had maintained its opposition, the request for transfer was to be rejected, the DPMA reasoned the decision.

Also in 2017, the Landgericht Düsseldorf issued an enforceable default judgment (LG Düsseldorf, 22 November 2017, 4b O 141/17), according to which the defendant there, the patent proprietor in the present case, was ordered to declare its consent to the transfer of the patent to the German Patent and Trade Mark Office. The appeal against this judgment by default was dismissed as inadmissible by judgment of the Landgericht Düsseldorf of 11 September 2018, 4b O 141/17. The judgment by default thus became final.

The question in dispute before the Federal Patent Court(BPatG) was therefore:
With the final judgment by default of the Landgericht Düsseldorf, have the requirements for a transfer of the patent to the applicant been fulfilled?

Legally binding judgement replaces required declaration of intent

The Federal Patent Court answered this question with a clear “yes”. If, as in the present case, a debtor had been sentenced to make a declaration of intent, the declaration and authorisation were deemed to have been made as soon as the judgment had acquired legal force (§ 894 ZPO). This is the case here. The civil law action for authorisation with regard to the transfer was thus legally concluded. The BPatG ruled that the final judgment “replaces” the authorisation in the form required for it.

Substantive objection without success

The defendant and patentee also raised a substantive objection in its opposition. She had already transferred ownership of the patent to E. in 2012. To prove this claim, she filed a bilingual patent transfer agreement, which also contained a clause stating that the patent would remain the property of the seller until the purchase price had been paid in full.

The applicant argued that this alleged earlier patent transfer had not taken place because the respondent was still registered as the patent holder and had also paid the annual fee due for 2017. Quite apart from that, the BPatG clarified that this substantive objection was irrelevant for this case anyway.

The court clarified that the objection that the registered patent proprietor and opponent had ceased to be the proprietor of the patent concerned at the time of assignment to the applicant and that the assignment to the applicant had therefore become null and void should have been raised in civil litigation. After the submission of a formally legally binding civil court decision on the transfer, there was no longer any room for this in the official patent transfer procedure.

The BPatG therefore annulled the decision of the DPMA and ordered the requested transfer and amendment of the register in the German patent register.

Do you also need support with the transfer of IP rights?

Our attorneys advise and support you in all questions relating to the transfer of IP rights and prepare all documents for you to sign.
We offer you standardised processes and can thus offer you an optimised and cost-conscious process for your rewriting. Feel free to contact us, also with our recall offer.


Sources:

Judgement of BPatG of 28 June 2019, 7 W (pat) 4/18

Image:

Aymanejed /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag iconapplication for description,  authorisation,  BPatG,  change of law,  change of name,  change of ownership,  consent to the transfer,  declaration of intent,  federal patent court,  grant,  ip rights,  judgment by default,  ownership,  patent register,  permit,  production of documents,  registration of legal succession,  substantive objection,  transfer,  transfer of a patent,  transfer of IP rights

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.