• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

How to response to the extended European search report?

24. May 2016

There have been some changes in the European Patent Convention (EPC). The search report from the European Patent Office (EPO) is accompanied by their opinion on the patent application and the invention. Both together make up the extended European search Report (EESR). The EPO gives the applicant now the opportunity to comment on the EESR.

 

The Opinion

The purpose of the opinion is to give the applicant a better overview over his application. It should help him with his further decisions about how to proceed with the further process of his application. After reading the opinion he should know whether to continue with the application (including the fee) or to interrupt the whole process because of e.g. too much inconsistence.

 

Positive opinion

A positive opinion will be issued if the application and the invention comply with the requirements of the European Patent Convention (EPC). In this case, they will probably suggest to grant the patent.

If a positive opinion is received, it is advisable for the applicant to consider voluntary amendments to the application. They could still improve the application even if it is already declared as ‘good’. Important: All amendments must be filed fast. In other words: before the application proceeds to examination.

 

Opinion including objections

If the application and the invention do not seem to meet the requirements of the EPC, then the opinion will set out in detail the searcher’s objections to granting a patent. The objections can relate to both formal and substantive matters.

-extended-european-search-report-applicationman-writing-pen

Responding to the opinion

If the opinon isn’t positive, the applicant has two possiblities:

  1. he can respond by arguing against the objections
  2. he can respond by amending the application.

The time for a response is limited. You have either

  • six months from the date on which the European Patent Bulletin mentions the publication of the European search report (for direct-filed European applications, including divisional applications)

OR

  • a time limit set by an EPO communication issued shortly after the search report and search opinion (for PCT applications in the European Regional Phase).

The application is deemed to be withdrawn if the applicant does not respond  within the mentioned period. If necessary, the loss of rights can be reversed using the “further processing” provisions.

Of course the applicant should respond aswell, if the opinion has been positive. In this case he needs to convey his accordance or, as mentioned before, amend his application. Step to the next paragraph, if you want to know how you should proceed your amendment.

 

Amendment

The patent applicant can amend the description, claims and drawings. The application needs to be amended if the opinion was negative but it can also be amended voluntary if the opinion was positive. We advise to amend it in every case, because it can always become better. IMPORTANT: The last chance to make voluntary amendments is the time period for replying to the EESR.

Amendments need to be filed with indicating the basis in the original application. If not, the EPO will probably want you to explain the basis for the amendment within one month.

Claims cannot be amended to relate to subject matter which was not covered by the EPO search, unless the subject matter relates to the same inventive concept as the searched subject matter

 

Deciding to proceeding – Examination

The next step after considering the search opinion could be proceeding with the patent application. This is the point where the examination fee is due to pay, if this didn’t happen before (e.g. on filing the application or on entering the European regional phase). After the payment the EPO asks the applicant for a confirmation of his wish to proceed the examination.

The payment has to be fulfilled in the same time as the search opinion has to be answered (see “Responding to the opinion” above).

 

Deciding not to proceed – Refund of fees

If the applicant does not want to proceed, he actually can just wait. If he neither pays the examination fee nor confirms the application’s proceeding to examination during the time limit, the EPO will deem the application to be withdrawn. In this case the examination fee will be refunded, if payed beforehand.

If the applicant withdraws the patent application later but before the start of substantive examination, then only part of the examination fee is refunded.

 

Source: EPO.org, mewburn.com

Picture source: pexels.com

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag iconEPO

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.