• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Employee’s invention in insolvency

15. February 2021

It is possible that the economic Corona restrictions will lead to an increase in insolvencies. We therefore provide information on the subject of employee’s inventions in insolvency. The German ArbEG obliges the insolvency administrator to offer an employee invention to the inventor or to sell it together with the insolvent business.

Diensterfindung in Insolvenz

German § 27 ArbEG – before and after 2009

§ 27 of the ArbEG concerns and regulates the fate of a service invention after it has been claimed by the employer in the event of insolvency. In 2009, however, § 27 ArbEG was significantly restructured. This affects an employee’s invention after it has been claimed by the employer and insolvency has been opened in the meantime.

The new § 27 of the ArbEG – since 2009 – obliges the insolvency administrator to offer the employee’s invention as well as the rights and duties relating thereto to the inventor for takeover if he does not plan to sell it together with the insolvent business.

The case law on the remuneration obligation of the new owner (and therefore new remuneration debtor) is also interesting in this respect.

New owner can discharge himself from the obligation to pay

According to a decision of the Arbitration Board of 2015 (Arb.Erf. 08/12), it is open to the new remuneration debtor, like the original remuneration debtor, to discharge himself from the remuneration obligation for the future by abandoning the IP right or the IP right application in accordance with § 16 ArbEG.

In the case heard at the time, the applicant had already left the company before the insolvency proceedings were opened. By means of an agreement, he had agreed with the insolvency administrator on claims to employee inventor remuneration for the period until the opening of the insolvency proceedings and a certain period of time, which the administrator also paid out.

The insolvency administrator sold the business division to the defendant, including all intangible rights pertaining to this business division, according to the purchase agreement. The purchase agreement also expressly referred to the existing obligations under the ArbEG with regard to the right to the protection of inventions.

Employee inventor no longer employed at the time of insolvency

Pursuant to § 27 ArbEG, the acquirer of an insolvent business is obliged to pay remuneration for acts of exploitation from the time of the opening of insolvency proceedings if the insolvency administrator disposes of the employee’s inventions together with the business. An obligation to pay remuneration exists with the sale of a technically and organisationally independent part of the business that theoretically allows the exploitation of the employee’s invention.

According to case law, this also applies if the inventor is no longer employed by the insolvent company at the time of insolvency. It also follows from § 26 ArbEG that the claims to employee’s  inventor remuneration are generally not dependent on the continuation of the employment relationship.

Duty to offer under section 16 ArbEG

It is fact that § 27 ArbEG refers to the employer’s obligation to pay remuneration. However, the obligation to pay also includes the possibility to be relieved of this obligation, and the new party liable for payment also has such a right, the Arbitration Board ruled. This is also connected with the obligation to offer under § 16 (1) ArbEG, according to which the inventor can continue the abandoned service invention himself. Therefore, it is open to the new remuneration debtor, like the original remuneration debtor, to dispense with the remuneration obligation for the future by abandoning the IP right or the IP right application in accordance with § 16 ArbEG.

However, if the patent application is withdrawn without granting the inventor the possibility to take over the patent, the possibility of the inventor’s economic participation in the invention is irreversibly eliminated unilaterally and prematurely under patent law, the Arbitration Board stated. A violation of § 16 (1) ArbEG could therefore give rise to a claim for damages by the employee under § 823 (2) BGB against the person who abandoned the IP right.

Do you have questions about an employee’s invention?

Our patent law firm Meyer-Dulheuer has extensive expertise in the field of patent law and inventor law.

We will be pleased to represent your interests both before the arbitration board and in any court proceedings that may become necessary. Please feel free to take advantage of our consultation offer.


 

Sources: 

Decistions of Schiedsstelle Arb.Erf. 08/12

Image:

DarkWorX | pixabay.com | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag icon§ 27 ArbEG,  ArbEG,  employee invention,  duty to offer,  insolvency,  service invention in insolvency

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]