• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Anti-suit injunction: German Interim injunction against Chinese ASI

22. June 2021

The Munich Regional Court has ruled on a German injunction application of an US applicant against a Chinese Anti-Suit Injunction (ASI) – Anti-suit injunction as worldwide weapon in FRAND and SEP litigation, including “increases” to AASI, AAASI and AAAASI:

Chinesische ASI

Parties are global telecommunications groups

The plaintiff (injunctive plaintiff) is a group of companies for telecommunications services with its seat in W., Delaware, USA. It is the owner of numerous intellectual property rights in Germany and worldwide, inter alia in the field of mobile telecommunications of the second (GSM), third (UMTS), fourth (LTE) and fifth (5G) generation.

The Defendant is the Chinese group and electronics manufacturer Xiaomi (as well as its 100% owned subsidiaries from Wuhan, China) and, as of the beginning of 2020, the world’s third largest manufacturer of smartphones. The defendant also has a branch office in D. and B. respectively. In addition, the defendant also has two delivery addresses in China (Beijing and Hong Kong).

No success in FRAND licence -ASI followed

According to the injunctive plaintiff’s allegations, the plaintiff had been trying unsuccessfully for seven years to reach an agreement with the defendants on the conclusion of a FRAND licence over its SEP portfolio concerning 3G and 4G technology. Most recently, a licence offer had been made unsuccessfully in February 2020. This was followed by a back-and-forth of declaratory relief and anti-suit injunction (ASI) between the parties in the period from June 2020 to November 2020, including ASI and ASI responses (AASI, AAASI) before the Intermediate People’s Court in Wuhan, People’s Republic of China, the High Court in New Delhi, India and finally also the Regional Court I Munich.

Application on Interim injunction against Chinese ASI – in Germany

Finally, the plaintiff from the USA applied for a interim injunction before the Munich Regional Court I, which the Munich Regional Court confirmed on 9 November 2020 and also ordered enforcement of the interim injunction against the defendant from China.

The defendants from China brought an action against this decision of the LG Munich. They argued that the public service on them was ineffective and that the proceedings pending in India and China precluded the denial of another lis pendens or the affirmation of a need for legal protection.

However, in vain; in its decision of 25 February 2021 (7 O 14276/20), the Munich Regional Court confirmed the contested interim injunction of 9 November 2020. In addition, the Munich Regional Court formulated some guiding principles for a domestic injunction application against Chinese anti-suit injunction.

Chinese ASI – Public service

In principle, public service can be effected if service abroad is not possible or does not promise success. This is also the case, the Munich Regional Court explained, if the requested authority refuses legal assistance. With regard to China, the Regional Court explicitly said, that it must currently be assumed that the competent Chinese authorities refuse or significantly delay the service of court summonses and orders from Germany, especially in patent litigation.

Application for ASI and AASI

According to the Munich District Court, an application before a Chinese court for an anti-suit injunction (ASI), i.e. a Chinese ASI, or a decision prohibiting the application for a decision of the present type (anti-anti-suit injunction(AASI)) with the aim of preventing the enforcement of injunctive relief for patent infringement in Germany constitutes an interference with the proprietary legal position of the patent proprietor.

AASI, AAASI and AAAASI

The Munich Regional Court added that it was open to a patent proprietor to file an application for appropriate provisional countermeasures based on the risk of first infringement, which, instead of or in addition to orders relating to a threatened or already issued ASI (AASI), may also include orders (AAAASI) not to file an application for a provisional order (AAASI) abroad from filing an application for an injunction of the present kind (AASI).

Once again, this shows: Anti-suit injunction is a popular weapon in FRAND and SEP litigation.

Risk of first infringement

The Munich District Court explained that a risk of first infringement is particularly likely if the patent user has threatened or filed an application for an ASI against the patent proprietor or has filed or threatened to file a main action for the grant of a licence or for the determination of a reasonable global royalty for such a licence in a jurisdiction that generally provides ASIs.

Do you need assistance with patent protection or licensing issues?

Our attorneys and patent attorneys have many years of expertise in patent and licensing law as well as in the entire field of intellectual property and are authorised to represent you before any court – in Germany and also internationally.
Please contact us if you are interested.


 

Sources:

LG München I, Endurteil v. 25.02.2021 – 7 O 14276/20

Image:

sulox32 | pixabay | CCO License

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconLicenses,  Patent Law Tag icon5G,  AAAASI,  AAASI,  Anti-Suit Injunction,  ASI,  ASI in China,  China,  Chinese ASI,  G 5,  global,  Landgericht München,  LG München,  public service,  risk of first offence,  telecommunications,  Xiaomi

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Licenses

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.