• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

2021: GER Patent Modernisation Act in force

20. August 2021

The reform and modernisation of patent law in Germany finally comes into force: the German Patent Modernisation Act entered into force on 18 August 2021. Essential are additions to § 139 PatG and § 145 PatG and the streamlining of invaldity proceedings.

Patent Modernisierungsgesetz - in Kraft 2021The Patent Modernisation Act was prepared for a long time and was already in the government’s vote in 2020 – we reported. It finally came into force on 18 August 2021. The German Patent Modernisation Act is intended to improve two aspects in particular of the current practice of patent infringement proceedings:

Proportionality of injunctive relief

With the current entry into force of the Second Patent Modernisation Act, proportionality considerations will be taken into account with regard to injunctive relief in patent disputes. For this purpose, the previous § 139 Patent Act was supplemented by the statement that the claim for injunctive relief may be limited by way of exception if, due to special circumstances in the individual case, the claim for injunctive relief would lead to disproportionate hardship for the infringer or third parties not justified by the exclusive right.

Analogously, a similar passage was also drafted as law for utility models, as an amendment to 3 24 Utility Model Act.

With regard to the practical implementation of this legal innovation, the next judgments remain to be seen with interest. Up to now, German courts have regarded a restriction of the right to injunctive relief as an absolute exception.

End of Injunction Gap?

For long, there have been expectations from many sides to end the so-called “Injunction Gap” in Germany between patent infringement and invalidity proceedings, if possible. This refers to the sometimes very long time of nullity proceedings before the Federal Patent Court (BPatG), because until now the court set a date for oral proceedings and this could be tactically protracted.

The Patent Modernisation Act § 83 PatG therefore introduces a time limit within which the BPatG must issue its reference order to the infringement court: this must be done within 6 months. For this purpose, the Federal Patent Court is authorised to disregard arguments of the parties received after the expiry of the time limit for the reference decision.

Revocation and further processing of supplementary protection certificates

In addition, the Patent Modernisation Act legally establishes the revocation and further processing of supplementary protection certificates, as it has already been done in practice: supplementary protection certificates can be revoked upon request of the holder under Sec. 64 Patent Act and that the procedural institute of further processing (§ 123a Patent Act) also applies to supplementary protection certificates (§ 16a (2) Patent Act).

Business secret in court proceedings: new § 145a PatG

Finally, the Patent Modernisation Act added the second sentence of the new § 145a Patent Act, according to which all information introduced into the proceedings may be classified as trade secrets. Although § 145a PatG also provides for exceptions (namely independent evidence proceedings and compulsory licensing proceedings), it can be assumed that, especially in independent evidence proceedings, the opposing party will not have automatic access to all information obtained during the inspection at the defendant’s premises.

Sources:

Bundesgesetzblatt vom 17. August 2021

Image:

ID 249 | pixabay | CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconPatent Law Tag iconInvalidity proceeding,  Injunction claims patent proceedings,  proportionality,  Injunction gap,  business secrets,  August 2021,  invalidity,  2021,  § 139 PatG,  Court proceedings,  adaptions 2021,  German patent law,  Injunction claims,  Patent Modernisation Act,  German Patent Act,  Second Patent Modernisation Act,  Patent Act,  Reform German Patent Act,  patent law,  Patent Act modernised,  patent invalidity,  Streamlining nullity proceedings

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Patent Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

22. February 2022
PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

PAP is in force: UPC possible in 2022

8. February 2022
Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

Germany: Value in dispute and costs in proceedings

3. February 2022
PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

PCT application – does the principle of joint applicants apply?

1. February 2022
Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

Proof of patent infringement by whistleblower

19. January 2022
Computer Data identification declared invalid

Computer Data identification declared invalid

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]