• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Online purchase of mattress: AG strengthens consumer protection

19. December 2018

An mattress bought via online purchase can be returned in the revocation also after removing the protective film, was today stated in opinion of Advocate General. After his interpretation it does not belong to the sealed goods, which are not suitable for the return for hygiene reasons.

Right of withdrawal for online purchase

mattressOn 25 November 2014, Mr Sascha Ledowski, the defendant in the main proceedings, ordered a mattress for private use via the plaintiff’s website slewo. He exercised his right of withdrawal after removing the protective film from the mattress. Slewo refused to accept that and invoked a contractual clause according to which the right of withdrawal for sealed goods expires for reasons of hygiene if their sealing was removed after delivery.

The Federal Supreme Court (BGH) regards as decisive in this law case whether mattresses are to be seen in the sense of the appropriate European Union regulation as sealed goods with limited right of revocation. This is viewed very differently by the EU members , because mattresses can come with intended use directly with the human body into contact, but could be made marketable again by suitable cleaning measures of the entrepreneur.

The reference for a preliminary ruling therefore seeks an interpretation of Article 6(1)(k) and Article 16(e) of Directive 2011/83/EU and of the limitation of the right of withdrawal for a distance contract described therein. The question referred aroused considerable international interest: the Belgian and Italian Governments and the European Commission submitted written observations on it. The Italian government and the European Commission argued in favour of preserving consumers‘ right of withdrawal.

Advocate General strengthens consumer protection

The Advocate General’s interpretation in today’s preliminary ruling strengthens consumer protection. Consumers must be able to examine and examine the goods purchased, but only to the extent necessary to establish the nature, characteristics and functioning of those goods. In that regard, the Advocate General considers that a mattress is comparable to an article of clothing which the legislature has expressly provided for to be returned to the entrepreneur.

Sealing within the meaning of the EU Directive

Furthermore, for a protective film to be regarded as sealing within the meaning of Article 16(e) of Directive 2011/83, it is necessary for it to be able to guarantee the cleanliness of the product it encloses. That criterion presupposes that that packaging is sufficiently resistant and that it cannot be opened without causing visible damage. Examples could be a sealed plastic film or a sealed metallic wrapping.

Mattresses not covered by the term “sealed goods”

The Advocate General therefore recommends that the EU directive be interpreted in such a way that goods such as mattresses which can be cleaned by the operator after direct human contact are not covered by the term “sealed goods which are not suitable for return for health or hygiene reasons” within the meaning of that EU directive. The action brought by slewo must therefore be dismissed. If the European Court of Justice were to endorse the opinion of Advocate General, consumer protection would be strengthened – prospects for the next year.

Do you need help concerning distance selling or widthdrawal?

Then please do not hesitate to contact us. Our lawyers consider each case individually and confidentially.

Request your call-back without any obligations!

CAT-call_en

Sources:

Opinion of Advocate General SAUGMANDSGAARD (Case C:2018:1041)

Picture:

Pexels / pixabay.com / CCO License

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconOverall Tag iconEU Directive,  sealed goods,  mattresses,  Online purchase,  consumer protection,  Advocate General,  Opinion of Advocate General,  opinion,  withdrawal

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Overall

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

16. July 2020
ECJ and Facebook: Transfer of personal data to the USA

ECJ and Facebook: Transfer of personal data to the USA

12. July 2019
CJEU confirms cartel of optical drive manufacturers

CJEU confirms cartel of optical drive manufacturers

2. April 2019
Revocation of online purchase of a mattress – even without protective film

Revocation of online purchase of a mattress – even without protective film

17. January 2019
Amazon Dash Button banned in Germany

Amazon Dash Button banned in Germany

23. October 2018
File sharing – Protection of family life no longer first

File sharing – Protection of family life no longer first

29. August 2018
No right of withdrawal for consumers at German trade fairs

No right of withdrawal for consumers at German trade fairs

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]