• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Halloumi cheese lost trademark protection in UK

15. January 2019

Cyprus has lost its Halloumi mark for the United Kingdom. The Ministry in Cyprus never replied to the request for cancellation of the trade mark by a British company. Cyprus also lost in the dispute over Halloumi figurative marks before the CJEU.

Cyprus’s Halloumi trademark for the UK revoked

UK is by far the largest market for the well-known Mediterranean cheese with the special texture. At the end of December 2017, the British company John & Pascalis Ltd, the largest importer of Cypriot cheese to Great Britain, began filing three separate lawsuits before British courts to have Cyprus’s Halloumi trademark for the United Kingdom revoked. The British Intellectual Property Office (IPO) informed the Cypriot Ministry that the relevant applications had been filed and stated in a letter to the Ministry dated 26 January 2018 that Cyprus had two months to reply to the company’s application for cancellation. Until May 2018, the IPO in Cyprus recalled the obligation to reply and that otherwise the trade mark would be declared invalid. As no reply was received, the Halloumi mark was cancelled in the United Kingdom at the end of November 2018.

The President of the Cyprus Dairy Producers’ Association, George Petrou, fears, according to British press reports, that in the future it may be possible for someone to produce any cheese product and label it with halloumi. Halloumi is protected as a Union word mark and since 2014 the mark has also been registered as the International Designation of Geographical Indication. In Cyprus, it is hoped to be able to take action against possible unauthorised competitors. But even the possible Brexit at the end of March would end trademark protection in the UK – as long as no agreements on trademark protection have been signed between the UK and the EU.

Cyprus lost in dispute over Halloumi figurative marks

Cowboys HalloumiIn addition, Cyprus lost before the European Court both in July 2018 in the dispute over the figurative mark Cowboys Halloumi and in September 2018 in the dispute over the figurative mark BBQLOUMI. In both cases, Cyprus invoked the former British certification word mark HALLOUMI. In both cases, however, the CFI rejected the objections of Cyprus. The word “halloumi” is understood by the British public directly as a description of the characteristics or even the origin of the goods and not as an indication of their certified quality, the court clarified. It must therefore be held that the earlier mark, which consists exclusively of the word ‘halloumi’ because it describes the characteristics and origin of the product covered by it, has only a weak inherent distinctive character and that, moreover, the existence of a high degree of distinctiveness has not been established.

BBQLOUMICJEU clearly referred to Regulation 2017/1001 on provisions for EU certification marking, which has been in force since 1 October 2017. Article 83(1) defines the EU certification mark as a mark “capable of distinguishing goods or services from the trade mark proprietor in respect of material, method of manufacture of goods or services, quality, accuracy or other characteristics, other than geographical origin, of goods or services which are not certified”.

Although the word ‘halloumi’ is generally perceived as a Cypriot cheese speciality, it is not possible to link the term “halloumi”, which is used as a generic term for a type of cheese, to a test mark or even to a reference to a certified cheese.

Unlike the Board of Appeal, the CJEU found that there was a low degree of similarity between the word mark with a reputation and the figurative marks at issue. Nevertheless, the similarity between the signs appears to be limited and in any event insufficient to establish a likelihood of confusion.

Cyprus therefore lost in both cases before the European Court.

Would you also like to protect your trademark or geographical origin?

Please take your chance and contact us. Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

CAT-call_en

Sources:

Cyprus Mail

Republic of Cyprus “Cowboys Halloumi” T:2018:481

Republic of Cyprus “BBQLOUMI” T:2018:593

Picture:

Efraimstochter /pixabay.com / CCO License  

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Trademark Law Tag iconbrand,  Cheese,  Cyprus,  figurative marks,  Geographical origin,  Halloumi,  Halloumi cheese,  John & Pascalis Ltd,  likelihood of confusion,  protection,  Regulation 2017/1001,  speciality,  Trademark,  trademark protection,  UK,  Union word mark

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.