• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

German Law: Equality of arms in court also applies in the UWG

13. August 2020

The Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) rejected the initial case, it nevertheless made an important decision for competition law: equality of arms in court also applies to the Unfair Competition Act.

EU Rechtssprechung und Corona

The case focused on a dental service, namely an impression set to take an impression of the dentition. By means of a test purchase, the applicant in the main proceedings established an alleged misconduct on the part of the complainant and warned her, inter alia, for allegedly lacking a “CE” marking. In addition, the applicant claimed for injunction pursuant to §§ 8, 3, 3a UWG in conjunction with § 6.1, § 9.3, § 10.2 and § 10.4 MPG.

The complainant objected, and in the further course of the proceedings, the applicant obtained a remission of the challenged interim injunction. However, the complainant was not involved in the court proceedings before the challenged decision was issued. For this reason, a complaint was filed with the Constitutional Court.

In this respect, the case affected both copyright law and the provisions of the Medical Devices Act.

Federal Constitutional Court did not accept the case

The Constitutional Court did not even accept the case for decision because it had no fundamental constitutional significance. The court nevertheless made an interesting decision.

The BVerfG ruled that the standards of procedural equality of arms and the right to a fair hearing in the protection of urgent civil rights also apply in principle to the UWG. This, in turn, is very meaningful, because it was only in June 2020 that the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that in a preliminary injunction procedure the opposing party must always be heard.

The BVerfG made the same ruling in this case (Ref. 1 BvR 1379/20). If the application for a temporary injunction deviates from the claims for injunctive relief asserted in the warning letter, the court must necessarily hear the opposing party. For it is to be seen as a violation of the principle of equality of arms in proceedings that the application for an injunction from the pre-litigation warning and the subsequent application for an injunction are not identical, the court explained.

Likewise, it was also a violation of the principle of equality of arms in procedure if the court gave the applicant information without informing the complainant.

Accordingly, it would have been constitutionally imperative to place the complainant in the same state of knowledge as the plaintiff in the main proceedings before the temporary injunction was issued, in that she too would have been informed of the court’s instructions in a timely manner, the court explained. However, this did not happen.

However, the BVerfG ruled that no interim injunction could be issued against without a hearing in the area of fairness law. The law on unfair competition is part of the competition law in Germany, in particular the law against unfair competition. Moreover, the court added that Directive 2004/48/EC does not apply to the breach of § 3a UWG in conjunction with provisions of the Medical Devices Act, which is relevant here.

Do you have any questions in competition law?

We consider each case individually and carefully.
Our lawyers have many years of expertise in trademark law as well as in the entire field of intellectual property and are entitled to represent you in any court – in Germany and internationally.
Please contact us if you are interested.


 

Sources: 

Urteil BVerfG, Az. 1 BvR 1379/20

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property Tag iconjudgment,  interim injunction,  competition,  unfair competition,  UWG,  equality of arms,  EV,  Federal Constitutional Court,  procedural equality of arms,  ref. 1 BvR 1379/20,  BVerfG,  "CE" marking,  law on unfair competition

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Bacardi wins in trademark dispute Vodka 42 BELOW 20. January 2021
  • HALLOUMI vs. BBQLOUMI: Cyprus loses again in trademark dispute 20. January 2021
  • Short word marks and similarity: First letter is not everything 19. January 2021
  • Where in Europe is a patent application worthwhile? 18. January 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

18. December 2020
EUIPO ‘SME Fund’: grant promotes SME applications for IP rights

EUIPO ‘SME Fund’: grant promotes SME applications for IP rights

17. December 2020
ECJ and Morbier: Designation of origin protects more than the name

ECJ and Morbier: Designation of origin protects more than the name

11. December 2020
Illegal videos on Youtube – no disclosure of the e-mail

Illegal videos on Youtube – no disclosure of the e-mail

19. November 2020
ECJ: Video reproduction is not a phonogram

ECJ: Video reproduction is not a phonogram

10. November 2020
German UWG: Updating Law is coming!

German UWG: Updating Law is coming!

19. October 2020
OLG Cologne: Text generator for legal documents admissible, but…

OLG Cologne: Text generator for legal documents admissible, but…

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form