• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

German Law: Equality of arms in court also applies in the UWG

13. August 2020

The Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) rejected the initial case, it nevertheless made an important decision for competition law: equality of arms in court also applies to the Unfair Competition Act.

EU Rechtssprechung und Corona

The case focused on a dental service, namely an impression set to take an impression of the dentition. By means of a test purchase, the applicant in the main proceedings established an alleged misconduct on the part of the complainant and warned her, inter alia, for allegedly lacking a “CE” marking. In addition, the applicant claimed for injunction pursuant to §§ 8, 3, 3a UWG in conjunction with § 6.1, § 9.3, § 10.2 and § 10.4 MPG.

The complainant objected, and in the further course of the proceedings, the applicant obtained a remission of the challenged interim injunction. However, the complainant was not involved in the court proceedings before the challenged decision was issued. For this reason, a complaint was filed with the Constitutional Court.

In this respect, the case affected both copyright law and the provisions of the Medical Devices Act.

Federal Constitutional Court did not accept the case

The Constitutional Court did not even accept the case for decision because it had no fundamental constitutional significance. The court nevertheless made an interesting decision.

The BVerfG ruled that the standards of procedural equality of arms and the right to a fair hearing in the protection of urgent civil rights also apply in principle to the UWG. This, in turn, is very meaningful, because it was only in June 2020 that the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that in a preliminary injunction procedure the opposing party must always be heard.

The BVerfG made the same ruling in this case (Ref. 1 BvR 1379/20). If the application for a temporary injunction deviates from the claims for injunctive relief asserted in the warning letter, the court must necessarily hear the opposing party. For it is to be seen as a violation of the principle of equality of arms in proceedings that the application for an injunction from the pre-litigation warning and the subsequent application for an injunction are not identical, the court explained.

Likewise, it was also a violation of the principle of equality of arms in procedure if the court gave the applicant information without informing the complainant.

Accordingly, it would have been constitutionally imperative to place the complainant in the same state of knowledge as the plaintiff in the main proceedings before the temporary injunction was issued, in that she too would have been informed of the court’s instructions in a timely manner, the court explained. However, this did not happen.

However, the BVerfG ruled that no interim injunction could be issued against without a hearing in the area of fairness law. The law on unfair competition is part of the competition law in Germany, in particular the law against unfair competition. Moreover, the court added that Directive 2004/48/EC does not apply to the breach of § 3a UWG in conjunction with provisions of the Medical Devices Act, which is relevant here.

Do you have any questions in competition law?

We consider each case individually and carefully.
Our lawyers have many years of expertise in trademark law as well as in the entire field of intellectual property and are entitled to represent you in any court – in Germany and internationally.
Please contact us if you are interested.


 

Sources: 

Urteil BVerfG, Az. 1 BvR 1379/20

  • share  18 
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Copyright Tag iconFederal Constitutional Court,  procedural equality of arms,  judgment,  ref. 1 BvR 1379/20,  interim injunction,  BVerfG,  "CE" marking,  law on unfair competition,  competition,  unfair competition,  UWG,  equality of arms,  EV

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

28. January 2022
CFI: Intel rebate system – Intel successfull in legal dispute

CFI: Intel rebate system – Intel successfull in legal dispute

18. January 2022
Bundling of NRW court jurisdiction for IT and renewables

Bundling of NRW court jurisdiction for IT and renewables

4. January 2022
Classifications 2022: IPC, Nice and Locarno

Classifications 2022: IPC, Nice and Locarno

30. December 2021
DPMA online services around New Year

DPMA online services around New Year

25. October 2021
ECJ: decompiling software to correct bugs

ECJ: decompiling software to correct bugs

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Torhaus Westhafen
Speicherstrasse 59
D – 60327 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]