• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Avanti: Union figurative mark, general vocabulary or advertising slogan?

24. July 2018

A longstanding dispute over the Union figurative trademark Avanti was recently decided before the Court of Justice of the European Union. Avanti – an imaginative sign or Italian and even German vocabulary? It is also a judgement on the distinctive character of a trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan.

AvantiIn October 2015, the plaintiff, avanti GmbH, applied to the EUIPO for the Avanti trademark as a Union figurative trademark. The registration was refused by the EUIPO in 2016, as was the Board of Appeal of the EUIPO appealed by the applicant.

Union Trademark application was refused

The Board of Appeal justified its refusal that the word’avanti’ was part of Italian and also German vocabulary. Some of the consumers who spoke one of those languages would, despite the figurative element and the colour of the mark applied for, regard it as a promotional indication which is not distinctive in relation to the goods and services in question because of the presence of the word’avanti’. Registration of the mark applied for must therefore be refused pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

The basic case-law on figurative signs is that, in order to assess the distinctiveness of a figurative sign, it must be examined whether the figurative elements in question can lead to a difference for the consumer between the mark applied for and the mere perception of the word elements used.

Verdict confirms the refusal

In its judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) also ruled and dismissed the action.

Unionmark Avanti
Applied Union Mark Avanti

At the center of the argument was the different colored letter v in Avanti. In the applicant’s view, this was not a letter but a stylized OK sign. It is not a letter because it has no different upper and lower case and no vertical symmetry. The court did not follow this view. The entire word “Avanti” is perceived. It did not matter that the v differed from the lines or that it was of a different colour. Nor does the emphasis on the shape and colour of that element alter the fact that that part of the sign applied for will be perceived by the public as a letter ‘v’.

The Court pointed out that signs are devoid of any distinctive character which are unsuitable for distinguishing the origin of the product or service in question from those of other undertakings. This is an absolute ground for refusal pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, even if the grounds for refusal exist only in part of the Union, as in the present case in Italian and German speaking areas.

Advertising slogan devoid of distinctiveness

Furthermore, a trade mark consisting of an advertising slogan is devoid of any distinctive character if it can be perceived as a mere advertising slogan, the CJEU ruled. This is the case with Avanti. For the progress to which the term “avanti” refers and the OK sign both represent positive and promotional advertising slogans in relation to the goods and services in question. The sign in question is perceived in its entirety as a slogan.

The CJEU thus confirms the decision and also the grounds of the EUIPO Board of Appeal and dismisses the applicant (EU:T:2018:24). Avanti cannot be registered as an Union trademark.

Avanti is registered as a 3-D trademark

Avanti fuelOther trademark applications for “Avanti” were more successful. For example, the Austrian oil company “Avanti”, which holds rights to an Avanti 3D Union brand (trade mark number: 1148258), is well-known. As a result, the brand name “Avanti” will certainly become very well known in Germany, as the mineral oil company is planning to build up a network of filling stations at Aldi-Süd stores in Germany – starting in just a few weeks’ time.

 

Are you interested in national or international brand or trademark protection?

Please take your chance and contact us. Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

 

 

 

Sources:

Curia Europe: EU:T:2018:24

Picture:

Free_Photos /pixabay.com / CCO License  

IADE-Michigo /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Trademark Law Tag iconEUIPO,  Court of Justice of the European Union,  Union figurative mark,  Trademark,  figurative mark,  absolute ground for refusal,  Avanti,  application refused,  Avanti filling station,  Aldi-Süd

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Own trademark application fails – despite comparable trademarks: Equal treatment? 5. March 2021
  • Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment 5. March 2021
  • BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor? 2. March 2021
  • Suspension of infringement proceedings 1. March 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

5. March 2021
Own trademark application fails – despite comparable trademarks: Equal treatment?

Own trademark application fails – despite comparable trademarks: Equal treatment?

1. March 2021
Suspension of infringement proceedings

Suspension of infringement proceedings

16. February 2021
BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest

BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest

16. February 2021
UK trademark after Brexit: earlier UK trademark in opposition

UK trademark after Brexit: earlier UK trademark in opposition

11. February 2021
EU figurative marks: Panthé figurative mark – a panther mark?

EU figurative marks: Panthé figurative mark – a panther mark?

9. February 2021
BGH ruling: Classe E versus German E-Klasse

BGH ruling: Classe E versus German E-Klasse

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form