• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Apple wins: DE patent on display orientation

5. March 2019

Apple has won in the Federal Patent Court. The focus was on Apple’s DE patent on display orientation, i.e. the determination and modification of the display depending on whether the user holds his smartphone upright or sideways. This important basic patent was filed as part of the PCT application and was rejected by the DPMA.

Apple patent on display orientation already filed in 2008

display orientation AppleThe controversial patent was part of a PCT master application for the patent “Methods and Systems for Providing Sensor Information to Devices and Peripherals” (PCT/US2008/005819), which was filed for Germany on May 6, 2008. The patent description mentions the problem that the sensors of a mobile device are often unable to correctly detect and distinguish between intentional and unintentional user movement. This results in the task of differentiating as well as possible between an intentional and an unintentional movement of the user in a motion control for switching the orientation of a display to upright or horizontal.

DE Patent of PCT application rejected

The part of the PCT parent application filed for Germany was rejected by decision of the Examining Section of the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA) of 2 March 2016 on the grounds that the subject-matter of the respective patent claim could not be granted due to lack of inventive step because it was suggested by publication D1. This publication describes an electronic device with a computer, such as a smartphone, which also has a tilt and swivel sensor. The examining body of the DPMA considered this to be in accordance with the original patent claim “switching the orientation of a display of the device” in the DE patent of the PCT application.

Federal Patent Court repealed rejection of DE patent

In principle, this formulation in Apple’s patent claim could be understood as meaning that the orientation of the device in space is to be determined, i.e. whether the user holds the device upright or transversely, the Federal Patent Court (BPatG) stated in its judgement. However, it was proven that it was not the orientation of the device in space that was meant, but the orientation of the display.

The additions in the features of the main claim in the DE patent of the PCT application contain provisions that the device “does not” move depending on the comparison of the motion information with a threshold value. It follows from this that a person skilled in the art can extract all the additional features and amendments to the main claim in force in relation to the original claim from the original application documents and that there is no inadmissible extension.

For the tilt and swivel sensor shown in publication D1, the test condition is specified as whether the device has been swivelled by an angle smaller than the threshold value for a longer period of time – this corresponds to the original patent claim. If this condition is fulfilled, however, this leads back to the beginning according to the teaching of leaflet D1 and then does not result in a change of the display orientation; i.e. this movement is ignored here as “unintentional”, in contrast to the teaching in Apple’s patent claim.

The Federal Patent Court clarified that the conformity of the doctrine of D1 with the doctrine of the main valid claim is limited to the fact that the orientation of the display can be switched by certain but different movements of the device. However, the test conditions of the applicable main claim were neither described in concrete terms, nor was it discernible how the skilled person could have arrived at them. Therefore, the doctrine of the applicable main claim was to be regarded as “not obvious to the skilled person”. The core idea of Apple’s divisional application at hand is that short movements of the device should be identified as “unintentional” and ignored.

The BPatG ruled that Apple’s patent claim was therefore grantable. The court also granted secondary claims (claims directed to a “data processing system”) and subordinate claims (claims directed to a “machine-readable medium”) of Apple’s patent claim.
 

Would you also like to protect your patent or brand?

Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

 

Sources:

Judgement of BPatG 17 W (pat) 33/16 (in German)

Picture:

Photoboy720 /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Patent Law Tag iconApple,  BPatG,  German patent law,  DPMA,  smartphone,  PCT application,  display orientation,  mobile,  display,  tilt and swivel sensor,  data processing system,  orientation of a display of the device,  switching the orientation,  German Patent and Trade Mark Office,  DE Patent

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor? 2. March 2021
  • Suspension of infringement proceedings 1. March 2021
  • Action against a patent already expired 26. February 2021
  • Design protection in China: Amendment 2021 25. February 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

2. March 2021
BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor?

BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor?

26. February 2021
Action against a patent already expired

Action against a patent already expired

18. February 2021
EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

EPO practice of national patent offices – more uniform

15. February 2021
Employee’s invention in insolvency

Employee’s invention in insolvency

12. February 2021
Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

Equivalence ruling of BGH: ‘Equivalent means’ in case Crane arm

5. February 2021
Trade secret: what are ‘appropriate’ secrecy measures?

Trade secret: what are ‘appropriate’ secrecy measures?

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form