• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

ALPINEWELTEN no Union Trade Mark: illustration not original enough

8. August 2018

Is the Union figurative trademark “ALPINEWELTEN Die Bergführer” descriptive? The Court of Justice of the European Union did not recognise a sufficiently original stylized representation in the figurative element and thus held the signs in question to have a descriptive character.

ALPINEWELTEN The mountain guides

The plaintiff, the Alpine Welten Die Bergführer GmbH & Co. KG, is a provider of guided mountain tours on domestic and world-famous mountains as well as for Alpine training in all mountain sports. In 2016, this company registered the company’s name “Alpinewelten Die Bergführer” (German, in engl: ALPINE WORLD The mountain guides) with the corresponding logo as a Union figurative trademark at the Office of the European Union for Intellectual Property (EUIPO). Registration should be made for the following Nice classes:

  • Class 16: (including printed products)
  • Class 25: (e.g. footwear, clothing, hats and caps)
  • Class 39: (e.g. organisation of travel)
  • Class 41: (e.g. leisure services in hiking, ski courses, ice climbing)

EUIPO and Board of Appeal see descriptive character

Union figurative mark ALPINEWELTENThe EUIPO accepted the registration for Class 25 but refused it for Classes 16, 39 and 41 on the ground that the desired Union figurative mark was descriptive for the services mentioned therein. This assessment was also shared by the Board of Appeal of the EUIPO. The Board of Appeal based its decision on the fact that German-speaking customers were to be regarded as the relevant public. And these would immediately and without further thought associate the corresponding services with “ALPINEWELTEN Die Bergführer”. Also, the graphic elements of the mark applied for could not call into question the dominant character of the word elements in the overall impression, but rather serve to further underline the conceptual content of the words. The simple triangle immediately evokes the simple representation of a mountain and the green color of the rectangle reminds one of nature.

In order to assess the descriptive character of a mark, which consists of several word and figurative elements, not only the individual elements of the mark are examined, but also the mark as a whole. Although each of these components is descriptive in itself, the combination of the two cannot be descriptive.

The applicant argued that the Union figurative mark in dispute was not descriptive. The applicant submits that the triangle in the mark applied for has other meanings than the representation of a mountain and can therefore also be interpreted differently. In all other respects, the illustrated element was stylised creatively and originally, and on that basis alone distinctiveness was established.

CJEU dismisses action

In its judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) made it clear that it did not share this view. The triangular shape in the present case is not unusual and not so visually striking that it distracts from the descriptive character. In connection with the word component, the triangle is a simple representation of a mountain. And the word element “ALPINEWELTEN Die Bergführer” has a dominant character in the disputed Union figurative mark. Only in the case of a special presentation leading to a sufficiently distinctive overall impression could a sign consisting of verbal elements and a simple geometric form be eligible for protection, the CJEU clarified.

The court pointed out that a sign in accordance with Article 7(1)(1) c of Regulation No 207/2009, if at least one of its possible meanings designates a characteristic of the goods or services in question. In the present case, it is therefore of no importance whether the triangle can also stand for other meanings, but merely that it can be regarded, among other things, as a representation of a mountain. The Board of Appeal was therefore right to consider the mark applied for to be descriptive within the meaning of Article 7(1)(1) c of Regulation 207/2009. In the overall view, it may serve to describe a characteristic of the goods and services concerned. The Court therefore dismissed the action and confirmed the refusal of Union figurative mark in question for Classes 16, 39 and 41.

Would you also like to protect your company name or your trademark rights?

Then please do not hesitate to contact us. Our patent attorneys and attorneys at law are experienced and highly qualified in all areas of intellectual property law, both nationally and internationally.

Request your call-back without any obligations!

CAT-call_en

Sources:

Curia Europe: T:2018:240

Picture:

Curia Europe: T:2018:240

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconInternational Intellectual Property,  Trademark Law Tag iconEUIPO,  Union figurative mark,  Board of Appeal,  Union trademark,  company name,  application for registration,  Alpine World,  descriptive character,  Alpinewelten,  Regulation No 207/2009,  distinctiveness

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: International Intellectual Property

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • Own trademark application fails – despite comparable trademarks: Equal treatment? 5. March 2021
  • Intel to pay 2.2 billion in damages – to VLSI / Fortress Investment 5. March 2021
  • BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor? 2. March 2021
  • Suspension of infringement proceedings 1. March 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

5. March 2021
Own trademark application fails – despite comparable trademarks: Equal treatment?

Own trademark application fails – despite comparable trademarks: Equal treatment?

1. March 2021
Suspension of infringement proceedings

Suspension of infringement proceedings

16. February 2021
BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest

BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest

16. February 2021
UK trademark after Brexit: earlier UK trademark in opposition

UK trademark after Brexit: earlier UK trademark in opposition

11. February 2021
EU figurative marks: Panthé figurative mark – a panther mark?

EU figurative marks: Panthé figurative mark – a panther mark?

9. February 2021
BGH ruling: Classe E versus German E-Klasse

BGH ruling: Classe E versus German E-Klasse

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form