• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Position mark Bottle cap: no distinctive character

21. January 2019

A position mark consisting of a bottle cap with a ring and a cord is devoid of any distinctive character, the European Court of Justice held. Such a position mark necessarily merges with the appearance of the goods.

Signs which merge with the appearance of the goods are, according to general case-law, distinctive only if they differ significantly from the norm and customary practice in the sector. It is therefore particularly important for the distinctiveness of positional marks to determine whether the mark merges with the appearance of the marked product.

Background

position mark bottleThe applicant in this case is Windspiel Manufaktur GmbH, established in Germany. The applicant’s predecessor in title filed an application for a three-dimensional position mark on 21 January 2016.

“The three-dimensional mark consists of a bottle stopper (stopper or cap) with a cylindrical outer contour, a ring and a cord. The ring is placed around the neck of the bottle. The cord is attached to the stopper or cap and passed through the ring to be connected to the ring. This positioning of the cord and the ring are elements of the position mark. The bottle is arbitrary and not part of the mark.”

This is what the description of the position mark in dispute says. The Examining Division and also the Board of Appeal of the EUIPO rejected the trademark registration. Because the mark is devoid of distinctive character. The applicant then put forward six pleas in law against that decision.

Position mark merged with appearance of goods?

In support of its action, the applicant alleges that the distinctive character was incorrectly assessed because the Board of Appeal failed to examine whether the sign in question merged with the appearance of the marked product. A bottle containing, as in the present case, a spirit or liqueur, including its cap, is to be equated with those drinks, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) clarified. It therefore necessarily merges with the appearance of those goods. The Board of Appeal was right to find that, the CJEU ruled, rejecting those pleas.

It should also be pointed out that the consumer primarily attaches to the packaging of a liquid product a mere packaging function, since it is a mandatory requirement of distribution.

CJEU confirms lack of distinctive character

The Board of Appeal was also right to find that the disputed position mark was devoid of any distinctive character. In the case of mass consumer goods, the Board of Appeal was not obliged to provide examples of practical experience. Spirits and liqueurs are not consumed on a single evening, but over many occasions and the bottle should therefore be opened and closed slightly. The Board of Appeal rightly concluded that the bottle cap as such was not unusual for the goods concerned. Furthermore, the Board of Appeal considered that, although the design of the mark applied for could be regarded as deviating from the norm by the cord and the ring, it could not give any indication of commercial origin. The European Court of Justice confirmed this view. The concrete positioning of the cord and the ring corresponds to the expected and usual market positioning of comparable components.

Evidence based on bottle caps in other Nice classes

Finally, the applicant considered it inadmissible that the Board of Appeal had relied on images of bottle caps belonging to another class in order to demonstrate that the bottle cap was not unusual. However, the question whether the Board of Appeal correctly assessed certain facts, arguments or evidence was part of the examination of the substantive legality of the contested decision and not part of the examination of the regularity of the proceedings, was clarified by the CJEU and dismissed the relevant pleas in law.

Would you also like to protect your design or trademark?

Then please do not hesitate to contact us. Our patent attorneys and attorneys at law are experienced and highly qualified in all areas of intellectual property law, both nationally and internationally.

Request your call-back without any obligations!

CAT-call_en

Source:

CJEU EU:T:2019:9 “Position mark bottle cap” (in German)

Picture:

graindivresse /pixabay.com / CCO License  

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconDesign Law,  International Intellectual Property,  Trademark Law Tag iconBoard of Appel,  position mark,  3dimensional,  3-dimensional mark,  three-dimensional mark,  bottle design,  bottle cap,  bottle,  Court of Justice of the European Union,  bottle shape,  Lack of distinctive character

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Design Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

17. February 2022
China joins the Hague Agreement

China joins the Hague Agreement

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]