• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

“Black Cab” trade mark: London Taxi Company loses appeal

24. November 2017

Bitter defeat for the London Taxi Company. The Court of Appeal of England and Wales has now rejected LTC’s complaint and confirmed that the shape of the “black cab” is not worthy of protection. The decision cleared the way for a new electronic hybrid taxi in the English capital.

 

Trade mark registered in 1998 by LTC

Since 2016, The London Taxi Company (LTC) has been running a lawsuit against Frazer-Nash and Ecotive, which are working together to bring an electric-powered taxi called “Metrocab” to market. LTC claims that Frazer-Nash and Ecotive have committed a trademark infringement as they have protected the form of the classic black London taxi in 1998 (Community Trademark and UK Trademark).

London_Taxi

However, the High Court decided already last year that the shape of the taxi had no “distinctive character” and thus was not a valid trademark (We reported on it). The London-based company said that the design of the new “Metrocab”, powered by an electric motor and an auxiliary engine with gasoline, is intentionally leaned on the LTC’s classic London Taxis to take advantage of its reputation. As a result, LTC appealed the verdict to the Court of Appeal.

 

Court of Appeal also sees no distinctiveness in “Black Cab” trade mark

The Court of Appeal now upholds the High Court judgment and rejects the lawsuit. They also state that the trade marks should never have been registered because they lack of inherent distinctiveness or acquired distinctiveness. According to Mr Justice Arnold, the marks do not differ significantly from the norms and customs of the automotive sector. The aspect that the iconic black cab can be regarded as typical of London, was not included in this evaluation.

It was also examined if there would have been a trademark infringement if the 3D mark had been legitimate registered. The finding of the first instance that there is no likelihood of confusion between the LTC trade mark and Metrocab could be fully comprehended by the Court of Appeal.

In addition to the differences in the brand, especially the differences in the design of the taxis are overall greater than the only slightly modified cab. However, if the 3D form trade mark was lawfully registered, Metrocab would have benefited unfairly from the reputation of the licensed London taxi. Thus LTC would have been right in this case.

Since LTC’s UK and CTM form marks have now been declared invalid by both the High Court and the Court of Appeall, they are no longer a barrier for third parties. So now the way is clear for Metrocab to conquer London with its electric taxis.

 

Do you need a patent attorney to defend your trademark against potential infringement?

Our attorneys are experienced in all areas of intellectual property and can help you wherever you need a professional. Contact us now to recieve a free call-back from our attorneys.

CAT-call_en
Source:

Text: Judgement of the Court of Appeal England and Wales from 01.11.2017 Case No: A3/2016/0867

Photo: Tommes64 / Pixabay.com / CC0 License | derwiki / Pixabay.com / CC0 License

 

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconLondon

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

10. February 2022
CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Torhaus Westhafen
Speicherstrasse 59
D – 60327 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]