• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees’ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Clara Elinor Grünewald
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

“Black Cab” trade mark: London Taxi Company loses appeal

24. November 2017

Bitter defeat for the London Taxi Company. The Court of Appeal of England and Wales has now rejected LTC’s complaint and confirmed that the shape of the “black cab” is not worthy of protection. The decision cleared the way for a new electronic hybrid taxi in the English capital.

 

Trade mark registered in 1998 by LTC

Since 2016, The London Taxi Company (LTC) has been running a lawsuit against Frazer-Nash and Ecotive, which are working together to bring an electric-powered taxi called “Metrocab” to market. LTC claims that Frazer-Nash and Ecotive have committed a trademark infringement as they have protected the form of the classic black London taxi in 1998 (Community Trademark and UK Trademark).

London_Taxi

However, the High Court decided already last year that the shape of the taxi had no “distinctive character” and thus was not a valid trademark (We reported on it). The London-based company said that the design of the new “Metrocab”, powered by an electric motor and an auxiliary engine with gasoline, is intentionally leaned on the LTC’s classic London Taxis to take advantage of its reputation. As a result, LTC appealed the verdict to the Court of Appeal.

 

Court of Appeal also sees no distinctiveness in “Black Cab” trade mark

The Court of Appeal now upholds the High Court judgment and rejects the lawsuit. They also state that the trade marks should never have been registered because they lack of inherent distinctiveness or acquired distinctiveness. According to Mr Justice Arnold, the marks do not differ significantly from the norms and customs of the automotive sector. The aspect that the iconic black cab can be regarded as typical of London, was not included in this evaluation.

It was also examined if there would have been a trademark infringement if the 3D mark had been legitimate registered. The finding of the first instance that there is no likelihood of confusion between the LTC trade mark and Metrocab could be fully comprehended by the Court of Appeal.

In addition to the differences in the brand, especially the differences in the design of the taxis are overall greater than the only slightly modified cab. However, if the 3D form trade mark was lawfully registered, Metrocab would have benefited unfairly from the reputation of the licensed London taxi. Thus LTC would have been right in this case.

Since LTC’s UK and CTM form marks have now been declared invalid by both the High Court and the Court of Appeall, they are no longer a barrier for third parties. So now the way is clear for Metrocab to conquer London with its electric taxis.

 

Do you need a patent attorney to defend your trademark against potential infringement?

Our attorneys are experienced in all areas of intellectual property and can help you wherever you need a professional. Contact us now to recieve a free call-back from our attorneys.

CAT-call_en
Source:

Text: Judgement of the Court of Appeal England and Wales from 01.11.2017 Case No: A3/2016/0867

Photo: Tommes64 / Pixabay.com / CC0 License | derwiki / Pixabay.com / CC0 License

 

 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconLondon

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law
This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Recent Posts

  • BGH “FRAND II” – SEP Licensing as Distributor? 2. March 2021
  • Suspension of infringement proceedings 1. March 2021
  • Action against a patent already expired 26. February 2021
  • Design protection in China: Amendment 2021 25. February 2021

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

1. March 2021
Suspension of infringement proceedings

Suspension of infringement proceedings

16. February 2021
BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest

BGH: Black Forest ham – not only packaged in the Black Forest

16. February 2021
UK trademark after Brexit: earlier UK trademark in opposition

UK trademark after Brexit: earlier UK trademark in opposition

11. February 2021
EU figurative marks: Panthé figurative mark – a panther mark?

EU figurative marks: Panthé figurative mark – a panther mark?

9. February 2021
BGH ruling: Classe E versus German E-Klasse

BGH ruling: Classe E versus German E-Klasse

4. February 2021
Protecting domain names as trademarks

Protecting domain names as trademarks

Footer

Contact

Franklinstr. 61-63
D-60486 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Customer Reviews

Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB Patentrecht, Markenrecht, Eigentum hat 4,78 von 5 Sternen 23 Bewertungen auf ProvenExpert.com

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Info secure emails
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

This form uses Google Recaptcha.

You must accept cookies from Google recaptcha to use this form.

More information can be found in our privacy policy.

load form