• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Similarity of Trademarks: Huawei analyses pronouncation of European languages

22. September 2017

The Taiwanese company Wawei wants to protect its name as a European Trademark. But the Chinese smartphone giant Huawei finds the brandname “Wawei”  confusingly similair to its own trademark. To strengthen their arguments before the EUIPO, Huawei analyses the pronouncation of the two trademarks in different European languages.

 

WAWEI_Logo_EUIPOFine food export company  Taiwan Wachine Co Ltd applied to register its trademark WAWEI (application no. 14759096) for food an drink in the Nice classes 29, 30, 32 on November 3rd, 2015. The opposition Huawei Technologies Co Ltd, one of the biggest telecommunication providers worldwide, has already registered the European Trademark HUAWEI on 17 February 2012 for all 45 classes.

Huawei, however, saw a likelihood of confusion between the trademark WAWEI an its own established trademark HUAWEI.

 

Huawei and Wawei: Same pronouncation in French and Spanish

HUAWEI_Logo_EUIPO

Huawei concedes that the two trademarks have a different beginning, which generally attracts the consumer’s attention first. But the chinese brand argues here that the overall impression of a trademark is the main point for the assessement of a likelihood of similarity. With “AWEI” four of six letters of both trademarks are matching. A signal for a high similarity, argues Huawei. In addition, the four similar letters “AWEI” have the same pronounciation.

To make the pronunciation of the two complete words comparable, Huawei has tried something new: The two trademarks have been analyzed for their different pronunciation in different languages of the EU countries. In German and Polish, e.g. an “H” at the beginning of a word is always pronounced. Thus there is a difference in “HU” and “W” in the pronunciation of HUAWEI and WAWEI. In Spanish and French, however, the “H” at the beginning of a word is usually mute. There is no difference between “UAWEI” and “WAWEI” in the pronunciation.

 

EUIPO sees high degree of similarity

These differences in the pronouncation must therefore lead to a different assessment of the similarity of the marks in different countries. In Spanish- and French-speaking countries there is therefore a high degree of similarity between HUAWEI and WAWEI. In Germany and Poland, however, only an average degree similarity.

This new line of reasoning with regard to the similarity of the pronunciation of brand names registered in Europe has apparently been well received by the EUIPO. The application for WAWEI as EU Trademark has now been completely rejected.

 

Are you suspected of having infringed trademark rights or is a competitor violating your rights?

Then we should talk to each other, because this is nothing to joke about! Our lawyers advise you individually and together with you develop the right strategy to protect your brand.

Make a non-binding call back call today:

CAT-call_en

Source:

Text: D Young.com

Images: EUIPO

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconEUIPO,  Huawei,  Trademark

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© MD LEGAL Patentanwalt, European Patent Attorney PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.