• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patentanwaltskanzlei

Patentanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Walter Benjamin Feldheim
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

After 9 years: Gucci and Guess end all trademark ligitations

4. May 2018

After years of arguing over designs and brand logos before courts around the world, Gucci and Guess have now formally settled all disputes. The Italian luxury fashion label and the US fashion company have announced this in a joint statement. The terms of the agreement are not known though.

 

As a result of the agreement, both parties want to end all ongoing legal proceedings worldwide, in which the Italians in majority of cases accuse Guess the copying of their brand logo and design. “The agreement is an important step for both companies in recognizing the significance of protecting their respective intellectual property portfolios and design creativity,” both parties said in a joint statement. The conditions attached to this new peace agreement are not known. Until recently, there were still ongoing ligitations in Italy, France, Australia and China.

First time before court in New York in 2009

The first legal dispute between the two sides took place in 2009 before the New York Federal Court. The reason for this was a shoe model by Guess, which was designed very close to the design of a Gucci shoe. Especially the interlocking G-logo used on these shoes was the trigger for Gucci to file a lawsuit – it looked very similar to their own worldwide known logo. The allegations were product piracy, unfair competition and trademark infringement.

In 2012 then, Gucci emerged victorious in the case: An injunction was filed against 3 of the 4 accused designs. In addition, the luxury label based in Florence was awarded a compensation of $ 4.7 million – still much less than the $ 221 million they had hoped for.

Encouraged by this decision, Gucci then started legal action against Guess in other countries.

 

Gucci vs. Guess: Different countries, different judgements

In 2012, the Italians filed a lawsuit against the trademark registration of the interlocking G logo of Guess before the EU court. Three years later the complaint failed with the reasoning of the EU court that “the signs in question produce a completely different overall impression, so that they can not be considered as similar” (We reported on it).

In Italy, Gucci accused the Americans of having copied their famous green-red-green stripe combination as well as several versions of their logo. But again a Milan court in 2013 ruled against Gucci, stating that Guess has used a different color combination and the logos were visually sufficiently different.

One of the bitterest defeats for Gucci followed 2015 in France: The Paris Tribunal de Grande Instance dismissed any allegation of trademark infringement against Guess and furthermore declared the Community trademark of the G logo of Gucci as invalid.

But 2013 in China and 2015 in Australia Gucci was victorious. In both cases Guess was convicted of trademark infringement and unfair competition.

With the agreement reached now, the final chapter in the long history of trademark disputes between the two parties seems to be over.

 

The fact that a luxury clothing label like Gucci has to defend itself against a so-called “copycat” is quite common. Last year Gucci was successful with a lawsuit against the fashion chain Forever 21 (Click here for our article). Forever 21 had copied Gucci’s blue-red-blue green-red-green trademark stripes.

 

Are you interested in brand or trade mark protection?

Please take your chance and contact us. Our lawyers are experienced in trademark and patent law, national and international law.

CAT-call_en

Sources:

Text: The Fashion Law.com

Pictures: Judgement of the EU General Court |  Raysonho / www.wikipedia.org – CC-BY-SA 3.0 

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law Tag iconfashion,  Gucci,  Guess,  Trademark,  Trademark law

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • What is the public allowed to know? 3. June 2024
  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

3. June 2024
What is the public allowed to know?

What is the public allowed to know?

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

Newsletter INT

© Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf INT

Please note: If we deal specifically with your individual case, this is what is known as an initial consultation. In accordance with Section 34 of the Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz, this incurs one-off costs of 190 euros plus MwSt. We will be happy to assist you in a personal consultation after our telephone call.

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Rückruf

Um dieses Angebot nutzen zu können, müssen Sie der Speicherung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zustimmen. Wir behandeln diese streng vertraulich und verwenden sie nur zur Kontaktaufnahme mit Ihnen. Mehr dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.

Bitte beachten Sie: Wenn wir uns konkret mit Ihrem Einzelfall befassen, ist dies eine sogenannte Erstberatung. Für eine solche entstehen gemäß § 34 Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz einmalige Kosten in Höhe von 190 Euro plus MwSt. Gerne helfen wir Ihnen im Anschluss an unser Telefonat in einem persönlichen Beratungsgespräch weiter.