• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Contact form
Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei

  • Deutsch

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email
MENUMENU
  • Services
    • Advice On Protective IP Rights
    • Patent Application /TM Registration
    • Enforcement Of IP Rights
    • Defence Against IP Rights Enforcement
    • Costs
  • Company
    • Fields of Law
      • Patent Law
      • Utility Model Law
      • Employees‘ Inventions
      • Trademark Law
      • Design Law
      • Trademark and Product Piracy
      • Expert Opinions
    • Our Law Firm
      • Dr. Karl-Hermann Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Tim Meyer-Dulheuer
      • Dr. Klaus Zimmermann
      • Zhichao Ying
      • Dr. Christoph Hölscher
    • Commitment
  • Contact
    • Where To Find Us
    • Write us!
    • Request call back
  • Blog

Battle of the Unicorns: Did Starbucks steal the ‘Unicorn’ Coffee?

11. May 2017

Starbucks has been slapped with a trademark infringement lawsuit by the New York coffee shop “The End Brooklyn” in connection with its “Unicorn Frappucino” that went viral in social medias. According to the lawsuit, which was filed last Wednesday, The End alleges that they stole the Unicorn drink, that the Coffee Shop has created. It’s dominated by the colors blue and pink. They began selling it in December 2016 (4 months before Starbucks launched their version). Furthermore they have a pending Unicorn Latte Trademark Application since January 2017 …

Unicorn Frappucino vs. Unicorn Latte

Unicorn_Frappucino_vs_Unicorn_Latte

The End has accused Starbucks of trademark infringement, arguing that the color-changing “Unicorn Frappuccino” -introduced in April for a limited period of time by the coffee giant- is copying The End’s health-conscious “Unicorn Latte”, which was already sold in December 2016. Montauk Juice Factory (the owner of “The End”) was overwhelmed by the success and consequentially applied for a Trademark for the drink’s name.

Fun Fact: Neither of the drinks contain coffee.

While Starbucks’ version consists of mainly milk and sugar (39g for the latter in the “tall” version, 12oz), The End’s Unicorn is made from ingredients like dates, ginger root, cashews, blended with “healthy” dried maca root, vanilla bean, and blue-green algae.

 

The End: “Stop using Unicorn” and “all your earnings belong to us”

Unicorn_Money_Trademark

Not only do the drinks share the same name, they both look very similiar that creates confusion amongst consumers (which is the central inquiry in the trademark infringement matter).

The plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief (immediately and permanently stop Starbucks from using “Unicorn Latte”) and want all profits that Starbucks made from the Unicorn drink, as well as monetary damages in connection with any losses that this case incurred. A spokesman for The End says:

“The size of and scope of Starbucks’ product launch was designed so that the Unicorn Frappuccino would eclipse the Unicorn Latte in the market. In addition to having a highly similar name, Starbucks’ Unicorn Frappuccino shares visual similarities to the Unicorn Latte in that both were brightly colored and featured the colors pink and blue prominently.”

 

Starbucks stated the claims are “without merit.”:

“The Unicorn Frappuccino blended beverage was inspired by the fun, spirited and colorful unicorn-themed food and drinks that have been trending in social media“

the company said in an email.

 

Protecting your Trademark against others

Your Trademark is (obviously) more distinctive and you want to protect it against competitors? Then let’s talk business today!

 

 

Source:

Text: Reuters.com / Starbucks Newsroom

Pictures: The End Brooklyn Instagram / Starbucks Newsroom / Graphicmontage of Dr. Meyer-Dulheuer & Partners LLP (Pictures: by Geralt and GDJ)

  • share  
  • share 
  • share 
  • tweet 
  • share 

Category iconTrademark Law

Primary Sidebar

More articles about: Trademark Law

All articles

Blog Menu

  • Design Law
  • Healthcare & Lifesciences
  • International Intellectual Property
  • Licenses
  • News from our law firm
  • Overall
  • Patent Law
  • Product- and Trademark piracy
  • Trademark Law

Recent Posts

  • BPatG: Patent claim of cancer drug on active substance as salt 7. March 2022
  • Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022 4. March 2022
  • CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks? 25. February 2022
  • EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible 24. February 2022

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Das könnte Sie auch interessieren:

4. March 2022
Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

Grant for European IP Protection: SME Fund 2022

25. February 2022
CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

CODE-X vs. Cody’s: Likelihood of confusion in drinks?

24. February 2022
EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

EOS lip balm no 3D trademark – appeal before ECJ not admissible

21. February 2022
CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

CFI: Pumpkin seed oil + PGI symbol

15. February 2022
SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

SPOTIFY v POTIFY – a ‘pot’ app

10. February 2022
CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

CFI: Shoes MADE IN ITALY

Contact us or request a call back

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]
Request a call back

Footer

Contact

Hanauer Landstrasse 287
D – 60314 Frankfurt am Main
Deutschland
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 199
[email protected]

Office Hours
Moday – Friday:   08:00-18:00

Fields of Law

  • Patent Law
  • Utility Model Law
  • Employees’ Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • Trademark and Product Piracy
  • Expert Opinions
  • Costs

Law Firm

  • Request non-binding call back
  • Company
  • Our Law Firm
  • ISO Certificate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data handling for clients
  • Imprint

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • xing
  • Email

Newsletter Signup

© Patent- & Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Meyer-Dulheuer MD Legal Patentanwälte PartG mbB

Contact Form

 

Give us a call, send us an email or fill out the contact form.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]

Kontaktformular

 

Rufen Sie uns an, schicken Sie uns eine Mail oder füllen Sie das Kontaktformular aus.

+49 (0) 69 / 606 278 – 0
[email protected]